Menu
Use when acting on code-review feedback, especially when a comment seems unclear or wrong. Requires verifying each point technically before changing anything, so you fix real issues and push back on mistaken ones instead of agreeing performatively.
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Based on SOC occupation classification
Use when several pieces of work are genuinely independent and can run at once, to fan them out across parallel agents instead of doing them in sequence. Cuts wall-clock time and keeps each strand in its own clean context.
Use when a written plan exists and you are about to build it in the current session, to work it task by task with a checkpoint after each. Keeps execution honest against the plan instead of drifting into a freehand build.
Use when work needs its own isolated checkout — parallel strands that would fight over files, or a risky change you want quarantined from the main tree. Gives each strand a real working directory on its own branch without re-cloning.
Use whenever the user says "use slipstream", "use superpowers", or starts any task in a project that has slipstream. A hard, always-on discipline that forces scoped reads over whole-file reads to save tokens, recalls memory before acting, and records what is durable every turn so memory grows constantly.
Use when a site needs to look designed rather than defaulted, before building sections: establish a cohesive design system of type scale, spacing, colour, radius and shadow tokens so every component shares one premium visual language.
Use when building the top of a landing page, to produce a high-impact hero with confident display type, a clear single call to action and balanced composition, the kind of opening a polished marketing site leads with.
| name | receiving-code-review |
| description | Use when acting on code-review feedback, especially when a comment seems unclear or wrong. Requires verifying each point technically before changing anything, so you fix real issues and push back on mistaken ones instead of agreeing performatively. |
| slipstream | {"category":"context","requires":[],"tags":["review","quality","rigour"]} |
Review feedback is input, not instruction. Acting on every comment without thought ships the reviewer's mistakes alongside your own and trains you to stop thinking. This skill keeps the bar high: treat each comment as a claim to verify, fix what is genuinely wrong, and disagree with reasons where the comment is mistaken. Agreement should be earned, not reflexive.
Every comment is resolved with either a fix backed by a passing check or a reasoned reply. No change was made purely to look agreeable, and the suite is green after the fixes.
