Menu
Use when producing a review verdict that needs clear evidence, risk level, and a compact decision-ready result.
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Use for Gitea, GitOps, registry, and every non-trivial implementation task that should be delegated to Codex instead of being coded inline.
Use for non-trivial implementation work. Delegate the coding or large-repo analysis to Codex CLI, then record usage before handing back results.
Browse in-cluster Gitea repos, issues, pull requests, commits, chart values, GitOps definitions, and sandbox image sources for read-only design context with the `__REVIEWER_GITEA_USERNAME__` Gitea user shared with auditor.
Review in-cluster Gitea repos and pull requests by reading files, inspecting diffs, checking comments, posting review feedback, and approving with the `__REVIEWER_GITEA_USERNAME__` Gitea user shared with architect; merge only with explicit instruction.
Use this to turn recent Qdrant memories and changed Nextcloud docs into clean Memgraph links, Qdrant graph-link annotations, and an updated grooming checkpoint.
Use when routing work to a standing specialist or reviewing a specialist return.
Based on SOC occupation classification
| name | format-verdict |
| description | Use when producing a review verdict that needs clear evidence, risk level, and a compact decision-ready result. |
Auditor outputs a verdict, not an implementation plan.
on-demand | risk-triggered | scheduledapprove | approve-with-notes | revise | rejectAlways produce:
## Audit Verdict
**Subject:** <what was reviewed>
**Scope:** <on-demand | risk-triggered | scheduled>
**Verdict:** <approve | approve-with-notes | revise | reject>
### Critical Findings
1. <issue>
### Observations
- <non-blocking note>
### Improvement Opportunities
- <concrete workflow or quality improvement>
### Confidence
<high | medium | low> - <brief justification>
### Recommended Action
<what should happen next and who owns it>
### Escalation Needed
<yes | no> - <why>
When returning the result through main, prefer:
## Audit Complete
**Subject:** <brief restatement>
**Verdict:** <approve | approve-with-notes | revise | reject>
### For the user
<one-paragraph summary of findings>
### Deliverables
- Nextcloud: <paths to audit reports stored>
- Qdrant: <memories stored, if any>
### Follow-up needed
<what needs to happen next and owner>