| name | slang-review-resolve-judgment-calls |
| description | Resolve Slang clarity review candidates marked as needing a judgment call. Use after consolidation and scope filtering, before posting, to perform focused follow-up analysis and decide whether uncertain candidates should be kept, revised, or dropped. |
| argument-hint | <candidate-markdown> <pr-number-or-diff-path> |
| allowed-tools | ["Bash","Read","Grep","Glob","Write","Edit"] |
Slang Review Judgment-Call Resolution
Review candidates marked Status: Needs judgment call or with Overlap decision: Needs judgment call. The goal is to resolve uncertainty through focused analysis, not to wait for a
human reviewer.
Do not post comments. Update the canonical candidate markdown file in place.
Inputs
Read:
- The canonical candidate markdown file after consolidation and scope filtering.
tmp/pr-diff.patch and tmp/pr-files.txt, or the equivalent PR diff and file list.- PR-version and base-version source around the candidate location.
- Callers, callees, tests, comments, and related declarations needed to answer the specific
uncertainty recorded in the candidate.
Decisions
For each judgment-call candidate, spend focused effort to make a decision:
Status: Keep when the concern is credible, in scope, and useful to post.- when the concern is credible but the proposed comment needs a narrower
location, clearer wording, or a different request.
