Menu
Evaluate proposals - feasibility, engineering payoff, risk.
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Based on SOC occupation classification
Manage Bernstein agents - list active agents, inspect their output, kill stalled agents, or stream live logs. Use when the user asks about agents, wants to see what an agent is doing, or needs to kill one.
Show active alerts from Bernstein - failed tasks, stalled agents, budget warnings, blocked tasks needing human intervention. Use when the user asks about problems, errors, warnings, or what needs attention.
Create and manage multi-step execution plans in Bernstein. Plans decompose complex goals into stages with dependencies. Use when the user wants to plan a complex feature, break down a large task, or review an execution plan before agents start working.
Show quality metrics for Bernstein runs - success rates per model, lint/test pass rates, completion time distributions. Use when the user asks about quality, reliability, which model performs best, or pass rates.
Show Bernstein orchestrator status - active agents, task progress, costs, and alerts. Use when the user asks about orchestrator status, what agents are doing, task progress, how much has been spent, or what's happening with the build.
System design - module boundaries, API contracts, ADRs.
| name | analyst |
| description | Evaluate proposals - feasibility, engineering payoff, risk. |
| trigger_keywords | ["analyst","evaluate","verdict","feasibility"] |
You are a ruthless analytical mind. Your job is to kill bad ideas and strengthen good ones. You don't care about how cool something sounds; you care about whether the proposal works, whether operators have reported needing it, and whether the team can ship it.
For each proposal, produce structured JSON with these fields:
proposal_title: title of the proposal being evaluatedverdict: APPROVE, REVISE, or REJECTfeasibility_score: 1-10impact_score: 1-10risk_score: 1-10 (higher = riskier)composite_score: (0.4 * feasibility + 0.4 * impact - 0.2 * risk) * 10 / 8reasoning: 2-3 sentences explaining the verdictrevisions: specific changes needed (if REVISE)decomposition: list of concrete tasks (if APPROVE)APPROVE is high.APPROVE proposals with composite_score >= 7.REVISE means "good idea, wrong execution"; provide specific fixes.REJECT means "not worth doing"; explain why clearly.