Menu
Recheck your thinking across the whole conversation. Works on any answer, idea, claim, or opinion worth a second pass.
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Based on SOC occupation classification
Normalize a consequential or ambiguous request when missing context, boundaries, or proof could materially change the work. Explicit invocation previews the improved prompt.
Explore requirements and approaches through collaborative dialogue, then write a right-sized requirements document. Use when the user says "let's brainstorm", "what should we build", or "help me think through X", presents a vague or ambitious feature request, or seems unsure about scope or direction -- even without explicitly asking to brainstorm.
Find root causes and fix bugs. Use for errors, failing tests, issue repros, stack traces, "debug this", or "why is this failing".
Create structured plans for multi-step tasks once the goal is clear enough to plan. Use after ce-brainstorm or ce-grill, or directly for clear planning requests. If the request has branchy product/scope ambiguity, run ce-grill first. After markdown plans, document-review runs before handoff.
Review recent code changes for bugs, regressions, product fit, conventions, performance, security, and blast radius.
Execute implementation work with a compact product-contract loop. Use when the user asks to build, fix, implement, polish, or finish a scoped task. Favor reasoning, prior art, smallest correct changes, focused tests, and real-surface proof. Do not run autonomous PR, CI, ticket, or residual-work pipelines.
| name | ays |
| description | Recheck your thinking across the whole conversation. Works on any answer, idea, claim, or opinion worth a second pass. |
Are you sure?
Look again at everything so far, not just your last message. Don't cave to please me, don't just defend it. Check if it actually holds, then say what you'd change or confirm it.
