Menu
Multi-pass deep code review — security, quality, and test gaps
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Based on SOC occupation classification
Outcome-first fix with a guided intake form — pick scope and probes from derived candidates, preview the contract, run with a verified receipt. Triggers on: attune fix, scoped fix, fix with receipt, outcome fix, fix intake.
Outcome-first fix with a guided intake form — pick scope and probes from derived candidates, preview the contract, run with a verified receipt. Triggers on: attune fix, scoped fix, fix with receipt, outcome fix, fix intake.
Spec-driven development — brainstorm, plan, review, and execute with quality gates. Triggers on: spec, brainstorm and build, plan and execute, idea to code, build from scratch.
Spec-driven development — brainstorm, plan, review, and execute with quality gates. Triggers on: spec, brainstorm and build, plan and execute, idea to code, build from scratch.
Developer workflow hub — routes to the right skill based on what you need. Triggers on: attune, what can attune do, what can you do, capabilities, where do I start, get started.
Outcome-first fix with a guided intake form — pick scope and probes from derived candidates, preview the contract, run with a verified receipt. Triggers on: attune fix, scoped fix, fix with receipt, outcome fix, fix intake.
| name | deep-review |
| description | Multi-pass deep code review — security, quality, and test gaps |
Multi-pass code review that runs security, quality, and test gap analysis on a target. Uses subagents to keep context clean.
git diff --name-only main...HEAD 2>/dev/null || git diff --name-only HEAD~3 2>/dev/null
Use AskUserQuestion to scope:
Then run three passes using the Task tool with subagents:
uv run attune workflow run security-audit --path <target>
uv run attune workflow run code-review --path <target>
Analyze which functions in the target lack test coverage by cross-referencing source files with test files.
Consolidate findings into a single summary table:
| File | Issue | Severity | Category |
|---|
Group by severity (high → medium → low). End with actionable recommendations.