container-security

name	container-security
description	Comprehensive container image security scanning and remediation. Analyzes Docker images for OS package vulnerabilities, application dependencies, and Dockerfile best practices. Use when: - User asks to scan a Docker image or container - User mentions "container security" or "image vulnerabilities" - User wants to secure a Dockerfile - User asks about base image security - Agent is working with Docker, Kubernetes, or container deployments
allowed-tools	mcp_snyk_snyk_container_scan Read Write Edit Bash Grep
license	Apache-2.0
compatibility	Requires Snyk MCP server connection and authenticated Snyk account. Docker must be installed for local image scanning. Registry authentication may be required for private images.
metadata	{"author":"Snyk","version":"1.0.0"}

Container Security Scanner

Guide for comprehensive container image security analysis, covering OS vulnerabilities, application dependencies, and Dockerfile best practices.

Core Principle: Secure containers from the base up - secure base image, minimal packages, no vulnerabilities.

---

Quick Start

1. Identify image to scan (local, registry, or archive)
2. Run snyk_container_scan with image name
3. Analyze results: OS packages + application deps
4. Provide remediation guidance
5. Optionally fix Dockerfile issues

---

Phase 1: Image Identification

Step 1.1: Parse User Input

Extract the image reference from the user's request (e.g., myapp:latest, nginx:1.25, gcr.io/project/app:v1, sha256:abc123..., or ./image.tar).

Step 1.2: Determine Scan Scope

Ask or infer:

• App vulns: Include application dependencies? (default: yes for v1.1090.0+)
• Base image: Separate base image vulns? (useful for understanding what you control)
• Platform: For multi-arch images, which platform? (linux/amd64, linux/arm64)

---

Phase 2: Execute Scan

Step 2.1: Basic Scan

Invoke mcp_snyk_snyk_container_scan with:

• image: the image name or path

Step 2.2: Advanced Scan Options

For more comprehensive analysis, invoke mcp_snyk_snyk_container_scan with:

• image: the image name
• file: path to Dockerfile (enables better remediation advice)
• app_vulns: true (scan app dependencies)
• severity_threshold: "high" (filter to high/critical only)

Step 2.3: Base Image Analysis

To isolate inherited vs. added vulnerabilities:

1. Invoke mcp_snyk_snyk_container_scan with image and exclude_base_image_vulns: true — shows only vulnerabilities your layers added.
2. Invoke again without that flag — shows the full picture including base OS.

---

Phase 3: Analyze Results

Step 3.1: Categorize Findings

Source	Description	Your Control
Base OS packages	Installed by base image	Change base image
Additional OS packages	Installed via apt/yum	Update or remove
App dependencies	Node modules, Python packages	Update versions
Dockerfile issues	Misconfigurations	Direct fix

Step 3.2: Generate Summary

## Container Scan Results: [image:tag]

### Overview
| Category | Critical | High | Medium | Low |
|----------|----------|------|--------|-----|
| OS Packages | X | Y | Z | W |
| App Dependencies | A | B | C | D |
| **Total** | X+A | Y+B | Z+C | W+D |

### Base Image Analysis
- **Base**: [base image detected]
- **Vulnerabilities from base**: [count]
- **Vulnerabilities you added**: [count]

### Top Priority Issues

| Severity | Package | Vulnerability | Fix Available |
|----------|---------|---------------|---------------|
| Critical | openssl | CVE-2024-XXXX | Yes - 3.0.12 |
| High | libcurl | CVE-2024-YYYY | Yes - 8.5.0 |

Step 3.3: Identify Fix Strategies

OS Packages: Update package in Dockerfile, upgrade base image, or use distroless/minimal base.

App Dependencies: Update in source manifest and rebuild image with updated dependencies.

No Fix Available: Document accepted risk, consider alternative package, or wait for upstream fix.

---

Phase 4: Remediation Guidance

Step 4.1: Base Image Upgrades

If base image has vulnerabilities:

## Base Image Recommendation

**Current**: node:16-alpine
**Vulnerabilities**: 15 (3 Critical, 5 High)

**Recommended**: node:20-alpine
**Vulnerabilities**: 2 (0 Critical, 1 High)

### Dockerfile Change
```dockerfile
# Before
FROM node:16-alpine

# After
FROM node:20-alpine

Migration Notes

• Node 20 has breaking changes in [list]
• Test thoroughly before deploying

### Step 4.2: Package Updates

For individual package vulnerabilities:

Package Fix: openssl

Current: 3.0.8 Vulnerable to: CVE-2024-XXXX (Critical) Fix Version: 3.0.12

Dockerfile Addition

# Add before your application layer
RUN apk update && apk upgrade openssl

### Step 4.3: Application Dependency Fixes

Application Dependency Fix

Package: lodash (via npm) Current: 4.17.15 Fix Version: 4.17.21

Steps

1. Update package.json: "lodash": "^4.17.21"
2. Rebuild image: docker build -t myapp:fixed .
3. Verify fix: snyk container test myapp:fixed

### Step 4.4: Dockerfile Best Practices

Key improvements to recommend:

```dockerfile
# 1. Pin specific tags (not latest)
FROM node:20.10.0-alpine3.19

# 2. Run as non-root
RUN addgroup -g 1001 appgroup && \
    adduser -u 1001 -G appgroup -D appuser
USER appuser

# 3. Multi-stage builds (smaller image, fewer vulns)
FROM node:20 AS builder
WORKDIR /app
COPY . .
RUN npm ci && npm run build

FROM node:20-alpine
COPY --from=builder /app/dist /app
CMD ["node", "/app/index.js"]

# 4. Minimize packages
RUN apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends curl

---

Phase 5: Verification

Step 5.1: Rebuild Image

# Rebuild with no cache to ensure fresh packages
docker build --no-cache -t myapp:fixed .

Step 5.2: Re-scan

Invoke mcp_snyk_snyk_container_scan with:

• image: myapp:fixed
• file: ./Dockerfile

Step 5.3: Compare Results

## Fix Verification

| Metric | Before | After | Change |
|--------|--------|-------|--------|
| Critical | 3 | 0 | -3 ✅ |
| High | 5 | 1 | -4 ✅ |
| Medium | 12 | 8 | -4 ✅ |
| Total | 20 | 9 | -11 ✅ |

### Remaining Issues
- 1 High: No fix available upstream (document risk)
- 8 Medium: Low priority (schedule for next sprint)

---

End-to-End Example

User: "Scan my app:latest image and help me fix it."

Step 1 — Run the scan:

mcp_snyk_snyk_container_scan(image="app:latest", app_vulns=true)

Step 2 — Tool returns (example output):

{
  "summary": "Found 18 vulnerabilities (2 Critical, 6 High, 10 Medium)",
  "baseImage": "node:16-alpine",
  "vulnerabilities": [
    { "severity": "critical", "pkgName": "openssl", "version": "3.0.8",
      "fixedIn": "3.0.12", "id": "CVE-2024-0001" },
    { "severity": "high", "pkgName": "lodash", "version": "4.17.15",
      "fixedIn": "4.17.21", "id": "CVE-2021-23337" }
  ]
}

Step 3 — Deliver structured response:

## Scan Results: app:latest
Base image: node:16-alpine | 2 Critical · 6 High · 10 Medium

### Immediate Actions
1. Upgrade base image → node:20-alpine (eliminates ~14 vulns)
2. Pin openssl ≥ 3.0.12 in Dockerfile (CVE-2024-0001, Critical)
3. Update lodash to ^4.17.21 in package.json (CVE-2021-23337, High)

### Dockerfile patch
FROM node:20-alpine        # was node:16-alpine
RUN apk add --no-cache openssl>=3.0.12

Step 4 — After applying fixes, rebuild and re-scan to confirm resolution.

---

Common Scenarios

Scenario 1: "Scan my Docker image"

1. Invoke snyk_container_scan(image="app:latest")
2. Summarize findings by category
3. Recommend highest-priority fixes
4. Provide Dockerfile changes

Scenario 2: "Secure my Dockerfile"

1. Review Dockerfile for best practices
2. Build image if not already built
3. Invoke snyk_container_scan(image=..., file="./Dockerfile")
4. Combine scan results with Dockerfile review
5. Provide unified remediation

Scenario 3: "Find a more secure base image"

1. Identify current base image and vulnerabilities
2. Scan alternative base images
3. Compare vulnerability counts
4. Recommend best option with migration notes

---

Base Image Quick Reference

Runtime	Recommended Base	Notes
Node.js	node:20-alpine	Smallest, may lack some libs
Node.js	node:20-slim	Debian-based, more compatible
Python	python:3.12-slim	Good balance
Python	python:3.12-alpine	Smallest
Java	eclipse-temurin:21-jre-alpine	JRE only
Go	gcr.io/distroless/static	No shell, minimal attack surface
.NET	mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/aspnet:8.0-alpine	Runtime only

Distroless options (gcr.io/distroless/): static (Go/Rust), base (most languages), java, nodejs — all offer minimal attack surface with no shell.

---

Error Handling

Error	Solutions
Image not found locally	docker pull <image> · check name spelling · verify registry access
Registry authentication required	docker login <registry> · verify credentials and permissions
Scan timed out	Retry · pull image locally first · scan a .tar archive instead

---

Constraints

1. Scan before deploy: Never deploy unscanned images
2. Pin versions: Use specific image tags, not latest
3. Document exceptions: If vulnerabilities can't be fixed, document why
4. Regular rescans: Images should be rescanned weekly for new CVEs
5. Multi-stage builds: Prefer smaller production images