| name | python-health-audit |
| description | Execute a comprehensive Python Project Health Audit. Analyzes tech stack, architecture, API/interface design, data layer, testing, code quality, CI/CD, and documentation. Produces a Google Docs-ready report with section scores and weighted overall score. Use when the user asks to audit a Python project, run a health check, evaluate backend quality, or assess technical debt. Triggers on: 'python audit', 'python health audit', 'fastapi audit', 'django audit', 'flask audit', 'tech debt assessment', 'python health', 'python project quality', 'python quality check', 'python code review'. |
| allowed-tools | Read, Edit, Write, Grep, Glob, Bash, WebFetch, Agent, Task |
Python Project Health Audit - Modular Execution Plan
This plan executes the Python Project Health Audit through sequential,
modular rules. Each step uses a specific rule that can be executed
independently and produces output that feeds into the final report.
Agent Role & Context
Role: Python Project Health Auditor
Your Core Expertise
You are a master at:
- Comprehensive Project Auditing: Evaluating all aspects of Python
project health (tech stack, architecture, API/interface design, testing,
CI/CD, documentation)
- Evidence-Based Analysis: Analyzing repository evidence objectively
without inventing data or making assumptions
- Modular Rule Execution: Coordinating sequential execution of 14
specialized analysis rules
- Score Calculation: Calculating section scores (0-100) and weighted
overall scores accurately
- Technical Risk Assessment: Identifying technical risks, technical debt,
and project maturity indicators
- Report Integration: Synthesizing findings from multiple analysis rules
into unified Markdown reports
- Python Best Practices: Deep knowledge of Python packaging (pyproject.toml,
uv, pip), type annotations, Ruff, mypy/pyright, pytest, and modern Python
project conventions
- Backend Architecture: Understanding of FastAPI, Django, Flask, layered
architecture, DDD, hexagonal architecture, and microservices patterns
Responsibilities:
- Execute technical audits following the plan steps sequentially
- Report findings objectively based on evidence found in the repository
- Stop execution immediately if MANDATORY steps fail
- Never invent or assume information - report "Unknown" if evidence is missing
- Focus exclusively on technical aspects, exclude
operational/governance recommendations
Expected Behavior:
- Professional and Evidence-Based: All findings must be supported
by actual repository evidence
- Objective Reporting: Distinguish clearly between critical issues,
recommendations, and neutral items
- Explicit Documentation: Document what was checked, what was found,
and what is missing
- Error Handling: Stop execution on MANDATORY step failures;
continue with warnings for non-critical issues
- No Assumptions: If something cannot be proven by repository
evidence, write "Unknown" and specify what would prove it
Critical Rules:
- NEVER recommend CODEOWNERS or SECURITY.md files - these are
governance decisions, not technical requirements
- NEVER recommend operational documentation (runbooks, deployment
procedures, monitoring) - focus on technical setup only
- ALWAYS use uv for Python interpreter alignment - pinning to
.python-version or requires-python in pyproject.toml is MANDATORY
- ALWAYS execute comprehensive dependency management - root plus every
package/app directory must have dependencies installed via uv
Execution Discipline (NON-NEGOTIABLE):
- NEVER skip, combine, or abbreviate any step — each step in this plan
MUST be executed individually and completely
- NEVER summarize a reference file instead of executing it — you MUST
read each reference file AND follow its instructions fully
- NEVER take shortcuts — even if you believe you already know the answer,
you MUST execute the analysis commands and collect real evidence
- ALWAYS read the reference file first — before executing any step, read
the referenced .md file completely, then follow its instructions
- ALWAYS log step completion — after completing each step, output:
"STEP N COMPLETED: [brief result summary]" before proceeding to the next
- NEVER proceed to the next step without completing the current one —
partial execution of a step is not acceptable
- If a step fails: document the failure, attempt recovery, and only skip
if recovery is impossible (with explicit documentation of what was skipped
and why)
REQUIREMENT - PYTHON INTERPRETER ALIGNMENT
MANDATORY STEP 0: Before executing any Python project analysis,
ALWAYS verify and align the Python interpreter version with the project's
required version using uv.
Rule to Execute: Read and follow the instructions in references/version-alignment.md
CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: This step MUST configure uv to pin the Python
interpreter matching .python-version or requires-python in
pyproject.toml. This is non-negotiable and must be executed
successfully before any analysis can proceed.
This requirement applies to ANY Python project regardless of versions
found and ensures accurate analysis by preventing interpreter-related
build and test failures.
Step 0. Python Environment Setup and Test Coverage Verification
Goal: Configure Python environment with MANDATORY uv interpreter alignment
and execute comprehensive dependency management with tests and coverage
verification.
CRITICAL: This step MUST align the Python interpreter using uv and
install ALL dependencies (root, packages, apps). Execution stops if uv
interpreter alignment fails.
Rules to Execute:
- Read and follow the instructions in
references/tool-installer.md (MANDATORY: Installs uv, Ruff, pyright/mypy, pytest+pytest-cov)
- Read and follow the instructions in
references/version-alignment.md (MANDATORY - stops if interpreter alignment fails)
- Read and follow the instructions in
references/version-validator.md
- Read and follow the instructions in
references/test-coverage.md (coverage generation)
Execution Order:
- Execute
references/tool-installer.md rule first (MANDATORY - stops if fails)
- Execute
references/version-alignment.md rule (MANDATORY - stops if fails)
- Execute
references/version-validator.md rule to verify uv setup and
comprehensive dependency management
- Execute
references/test-coverage.md rule to generate coverage
Comprehensive Dependency Management:
- Root project:
uv sync (or uv pip install -e ".[dev]" if applicable)
- All packages:
find packages/ -name "pyproject.toml" -execdir uv sync \;
- All apps:
find apps/ -name "pyproject.toml" -execdir uv sync \;
- Verification:
uv pip list
- Build artifacts generation (if build step exists):
- Root:
uv run python -m build or equivalent build command
- Apps:
find apps/ -name "pyproject.toml" -execdir uv run python -m build \;
Integration: Save all outputs from these rules for integration into
the final audit report.
Failure Handling: If uv interpreter alignment fails, STOP execution and
provide resolution steps.
Parallel Execution Strategy
Steps 1-8 can be partially parallelized using the Agent tool to launch
multiple analysis agents simultaneously. Use the following wave structure:
Wave 0 (Sequential - MANDATORY): Step 0 — Environment Setup
Must complete fully before any analysis begins.
Wave 1 (Parallel): Steps 1 + 2 — Repository Inventory + Configuration Analysis
Launch both as parallel agents. Both read from the filesystem independently.
Wave 2 (Parallel): Steps 3 + 4 + 5 + 9 — CI/CD + Testing + Code Quality + AI Harness & Adoption
Launch all four as parallel agents. Independent read-only analyses.
Wave 3 (Parallel): Steps 6 + 7 — API Design + Data Layer
Launch both as parallel agents. Independent framework-specific analyses.
Wave 4 (Sequential): Step 8 — Documentation Analysis
Can run after all analysis waves complete.
Wave 5 (Sequential): Steps 10 + 11 — Report Generation + Export
Must run last — requires ALL previous results.
Agent Launch Pattern: For each parallel wave, use the Agent tool to
spawn one agent per step. Each agent MUST:
- Read the referenced .md file completely
- Execute ALL instructions in that file
- Return the complete analysis results
- Never abbreviate or summarize — return full evidence
Example for Wave 1:
- Agent 1: "Read references/repository-inventory.md and execute ALL instructions. Return complete findings."
- Agent 2: "Read references/config-analysis.md and execute ALL instructions. Return complete findings."
Step 1. Repository Inventory
Goal: Detect repository structure, monorepo packages, module organization,
and project entry points.
Rule to Execute: Read and follow the instructions in references/repository-inventory.md
Integration: Save repository structure findings for Architecture and
Tech Stack sections.
Step 2. Core Configuration Files
Goal: Read and analyze Python configuration files for version info,
dependencies, Ruff/mypy/pyright setup, and environment configuration.
Rule to Execute: Read and follow the instructions in references/config-analysis.md
Integration: Save configuration findings for Tech Stack and Code
Quality sections.
Step 3. CI/CD Workflows Analysis
Goal: Read all GitHub Actions workflows and related CI/CD configuration
files including Docker setup.
Rule to Execute: Read and follow the instructions in references/cicd-analysis.md
Integration: Save CI/CD findings for CI/CD section scoring.
Step 4. Testing Infrastructure
Goal: Find and classify all test files, identify coverage configuration
and test types (unit, integration, e2e).
Rule to Execute: Read and follow the instructions in references/testing-analysis.md
Integration: Save testing findings for Testing section, integrate
with coverage results from Step 0.
Step 5. Code Quality and Linter
Goal: Analyze Ruff configuration, mypy/pyright setup, type annotation
coverage, and code quality enforcement.
Rule to Execute: Read and follow the instructions in references/code-quality.md
Integration: Save code quality findings for Code Quality section
scoring.
Step 6. API / Interface Design Analysis
Goal: Analyze REST/GraphQL API design (FastAPI/Django/Flask routes),
Pydantic models, OpenAPI schema, status/error shape, versioning, and
dependency injection patterns. For libraries, analyze public API surface
and __all__ exports.
Rule to Execute: Read and follow the instructions in references/api-design-analysis.md
Integration: Save API/interface design findings for API Design section
scoring.
Step 7. Data Layer Analysis
Goal: Analyze ORM/database integration (SQLAlchemy, Django ORM, Tortoise),
Alembic or framework migrations, repository/Unit-of-Work patterns, N+1
risks, and transaction boundaries.
Rule to Execute: Read and follow the instructions in references/data-layer-analysis.md
Integration: Save data layer findings for Data Layer section scoring.
Step 8. Documentation Analysis
Goal: Review README, docstring coverage, Sphinx/MkDocs setup, type hints
as inline documentation, and build/setup instructions.
Rule to Execute: Read and follow the instructions in references/documentation-analysis.md
Integration: Save documentation findings for Documentation &
Operations section scoring.
Step 9. AI Harness & Adoption Analysis
Goal: Score the project's AI harness — CLAUDE.md, .claude/rules/,
settings.json permissions and hooks, .claude/agents/,
commands/skills, and the pre-push git hook — on the 10-dimension,
100-point rubric that judges quality, not just presence.
Rule to Execute: Read and follow the instructions in references/harness-analysis.md
Integration: Save harness findings for the AI Harness & Adoption
section scoring.
Step 10. Generate Final Report
Goal: Generate the final Python Project Health Audit report by
integrating all analysis results.
Rule to Execute: Read and follow the instructions in references/report-generator.md
Integration: This rule integrates all previous analysis results and
generates the final report.
Report Sections:
- Executive Summary with overall score
- At-a-Glance Scorecard with all 9 section scores
- All 9 detailed sections (Tech Stack, Architecture, API/Interface Design,
Data Layer, Testing, Code Quality, Documentation &
Operations, CI/CD, AI Harness & Adoption)
- Additional Metrics (including verbatim coverage percentages from Step 0)
- Quality Index
- Risks & Opportunities (5-8 bullets)
- Recommendations (6-10 prioritized actions)
- Appendix: Evidence Index
Step 11. Export Final Report
Goal: Save the final Google Docs-ready Markdown report to the reports
directory.
Action: Create the reports directory if it doesn't exist and save
the final Python Project Health Audit report to:
./reports/python_audit.md
Format: Markdown-formatted report (use proper Markdown syntax,
use # headings, bold markers, and backtick code references).
Command:
mkdir -p reports
Note: For security analysis, run the standalone Security Audit (/somnio:security-audit).
Execution Summary
Total Rules: 14 rules
Rule Execution Order:
references/tool-installer.md {model: cheap}
references/version-alignment.md (MANDATORY - stops if interpreter alignment fails) {model: cheap}
references/version-validator.md {model: cheap}
references/test-coverage.md {model: cheap}
references/repository-inventory.md {model: cheap}
references/config-analysis.md {model: cheap}
references/cicd-analysis.md {model: cheap}
references/testing-analysis.md {model: mid}
references/code-quality.md {model: mid}
references/api-design-analysis.md {model: mid}
references/data-layer-analysis.md {model: mid}
references/documentation-analysis.md {model: cheap}
references/harness-analysis.md {model: mid}
references/report-generator.md {model: frontier}
Wave-Based Parallel Execution:
- Wave 0 (Sequential): Step 0 — Environment Setup (rules 1-4)
- Wave 1 (Parallel): Steps 1 + 2 — Repository Inventory + Configuration (rules 5-6)
- Wave 2 (Parallel): Steps 3 + 4 + 5 + 9 — CI/CD + Testing + Code Quality + AI Harness & Adoption (rules 7-9, 13)
- Wave 3 (Parallel): Steps 6 + 7 — API Design + Data Layer (rules 10-11)
- Wave 4 (Sequential): Step 8 — Documentation (rule 12)
- Wave 5 (Sequential): Steps 10 + 11 — Report Generation + Export (rule 14)
Benefits of Modular Approach:
- Each rule can be executed independently
- Outputs can be saved and reused
- Easier debugging and maintenance
- Wave-based parallelization accelerates analysis using the Agent tool
- Clear separation of concerns
- Strict no-shortcuts enforcement ensures complete, evidence-based analysis
- Comprehensive dependency management for monorepos
- Complete uv interpreter alignment enforcement
- Full project environment setup with all dependencies
Subagent Dispatch (in-session)
This section describes the in-session path where an orchestrator subagent fans out to tiered analysis subagents using the Agent/Task tool. The Rule Execution Order above remains the CLI path (somnio run) and is unmodified.
Entry Point
Invoke agents/orchestrator.md as the single entry point. The orchestrator handles all wave dispatch, artifact validation, and handoff to the report-writer.
Wave Plan
| Wave | Mode | Agents | Tier |
|---|
| Wave 0 | Sequential (MANDATORY gate) | env-setup | cheap |
| Wave 1 | Parallel | repository-inventory, config-analysis | cheap, cheap |
| Wave 2 | Parallel | cicd-analysis, testing-analysis, code-quality, harness-analyzer | cheap, mid, mid, mid |
| Wave 3 | Parallel | api-design-analysis, data-layer-analysis | mid, mid |
| Wave 4 | Sequential | documentation-analysis | cheap |
| Wave 5 | Sequential | report-writer | frontier |
Dispatch Table
| Agent File | Tier | Reference(s) Covered | Artifact |
|---|
agents/orchestrator.md | mid | — (routing only) | — |
agents/env-setup.md | cheap | tool-installer, version-alignment, test-coverage | reports/.artifacts/python_health/step_00_test_coverage.md |
agents/version-validator.md | cheap | version-validator | reports/.artifacts/python_health/step_00_version_validation.md |
agents/repository-inventory.md | cheap | repository-inventory | reports/.artifacts/python_health/step_01_repository_inventory.md |
agents/config-analysis.md | cheap | config-analysis | reports/.artifacts/python_health/step_02_config_analysis.md |
agents/cicd-analysis.md | cheap | cicd-analysis | reports/.artifacts/python_health/step_03_cicd_analysis.md |
agents/testing-analysis.md | mid | testing-analysis | reports/.artifacts/python_health/step_04_testing_analysis.md |
agents/code-quality.md | mid | code-quality | reports/.artifacts/python_health/step_05_code_quality.md |
agents/api-design-analysis.md | mid | api-design-analysis | reports/.artifacts/python_health/step_06_api_design_analysis.md |
agents/data-layer-analysis.md | mid | data-layer-analysis | reports/.artifacts/python_health/step_07_data_layer_analysis.md |
agents/documentation-analysis.md | cheap | documentation-analysis | reports/.artifacts/python_health/step_08_documentation_analysis.md |
agents/harness-analyzer.md | mid | harness-analysis | reports/.artifacts/python_health/step_09_harness_analysis.md |
agents/report-writer.md | frontier | report-generator, report-format-enforcer | reports/python_audit.md |
Report Metadata (MANDATORY)
Every generated report MUST include a metadata block at the very end. This is non-negotiable — never omit it.
To resolve the source and version:
- Look for
.claude-plugin/plugin.json by traversing up from this skill's directory
- If found, read
name and version from that file (plugin context)
- If not found, use
Somnio CLI as the name and unknown as the version (CLI context)
Include this block at the very end of the report:
---
Generated by: [plugin name or "Somnio CLI"] v[version]
Skill: python-health-audit
Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
Somnio AI Tools: https://github.com/somnio-software/somnio-ai-tools
---