looper-config

name	looper-config
description	Configure Looper quality gates for your project through guided detection and Q&A

Looper Configuration Wizard

Generate a .claude/looper.json configuration by detecting the project's tech stack and guiding the user through targeted refinement.

When to Use

• User invokes /looper:looper-config
• User asks to "configure looper", "set up quality gates", or "create looper config"
• User wants to customize an existing looper.json

Workflow

Execute these four phases in order. Never skip DETECT or PROPOSE. Always wait for user confirmation before writing files.

Phase 1: DETECT

Scan the project root for stack indicators. Use Glob and Read tools - do not guess.

Check these files (existence only unless noted):

File	Indicates	Also read
package.json	Node/npm	Read scripts and devDependencies keys
tsconfig.json	TypeScript	-
deno.json or deno.jsonc	Deno	-
pyproject.toml	Python	Read for [tool.ruff], [tool.mypy], [tool.pytest]
setup.py or requirements.txt	Python	-
go.mod	Go	-
Cargo.toml	Rust	-
Makefile	Make-based builds	Scan for test: target
node_modules/.bin/eslint	ESLint installed	-
node_modules/.bin/prettier	Prettier installed	-
node_modules/.bin/biome	Biome installed	-
node_modules/.bin/vitest	Vitest installed	-
.eslintrc* or eslint.config.*	ESLint configured	-
.prettierrc*	Prettier configured	-
jest.config.*	Jest configured	-
vitest.config.*	Vitest configured	-
mypy.ini or pyrightconfig.json	Python type checker	-
ruff.toml or .ruff.toml	Ruff linter	-
.golangci.yml	golangci-lint configured	-

From package.json, extract:

• scripts.test - test command
• scripts.lint - lint command
• scripts.format or scripts.prettier - format command
• scripts.typecheck or scripts.check - type check command
• devDependencies - installed tool names (eslint, prettier, biome, jest, vitest, mocha)

ESLint version detection:

• If eslint.config.* (flat config) is found, use npx eslint . without --ext flag (deprecated in ESLint v9+)
• If .eslintrc* (legacy config) is found, use npx eslint . --ext .ts,.tsx (or appropriate extensions)

Conflicting tools:

• If both ESLint and Biome are detected, prefer Biome (it replaces ESLint + Prettier) and note the conflict to the user
• If both Jest and Vitest are detected, check which one scripts.test actually invokes

Check for existing config:

• If .claude/looper.json already exists, read it and offer to update rather than replace

Run all detection checks in parallel where possible.

Phase 2: PROPOSE

Map detected tools to the closest preset from references/stack-presets.md. Then present the proposal.

Output format (print this, do not use AskUserQuestion):

List what was detected (runtime, test runner, linter, formatter, type checker), then show the proposed gates and checks in a compact table with name, weight, required/optional, and command. Show the matching preset name from references/stack-presets.md so the user understands the basis. End with Settings: max_iterations=10.

Then ask:

Does this look right? Tell me what to change, or say "looks good" to continue.

Wait for the user's response. If they request changes, apply them and re-propose. If they approve, move to REFINE.

Phase 3: REFINE

Ask targeted follow-up questions using AskUserQuestion. Only ask about things that matter and can't be auto-detected. Skip questions where the default is clearly appropriate.

Round 1 - Basics (always ask):

Use AskUserQuestion with these questions:

1. "How many improvement passes should Claude get before stopping?" - Options: "5 (quick tasks)", "10 (default)", "15 (complex work)", with 10 as recommended
2. "Should coverage be a required gate or optional?" - Options: "Required", "Optional (Recommended)" - only ask if coverage gate was proposed

Round 2 - Advanced (ask only if the user seems interested in customization):

3. "Do you want to add custom context instructions for Claude?" - Options: "No, use defaults (Recommended)", "Yes, let me add some"
4. "Do you want to customize project discovery commands?" - Options: "No, use defaults (Recommended)", "Yes, customize"

If the user selects custom context, ask them to type their context lines. If they select custom discovery, ask what commands to run.

Do NOT ask about:

• Gate weights (use defaults from presets)
• Timeout values (use 300s default)
• Coaching messages (use defaults)
• The enabled field (everything is enabled by default)

These are advanced options users can edit manually later.

Phase 4: WRITE

1. Build the final JSON from the proposal + refinements
2. Show the complete looper.json to the user in a code block
3. Ask: "Write this to .claude/looper.json?"
4. On confirmation:
   • Write the file using the Write tool
   • Validate with: jq empty .claude/looper.json
   • If the looper plugin is not enabled, suggest running /plugin install looper@claude-plugins-official once the marketplace listing is live

Rules

1. Never guess commands. Only propose commands for tools that were positively detected in DETECT. If you're unsure whether a tool is installed, use skip_if_missing.

2. Use skip_if_missing for all tool-dependent gates. This makes the config portable - it works even if tools are later removed or not yet installed.

3. Default weights must sum to 100. Redistribute proportionally if a category is missing. For example, if there's no formatter: typecheck=35, lint=25, test=40.

4. Default to required=true for all gates except coverage and formatting. These two are commonly optional because they can be noisy.

5. Always include checks for the detected formatter and linter. These give Claude fast per-file feedback without waiting for the Stop hook.

6. Show config before writing. Never write .claude/looper.json without explicit user confirmation.

7. Validate after writing. Run jq empty on the generated file to catch JSON syntax errors.

8. Respect existing config. If .claude/looper.json already exists, show the user what would change and offer to merge rather than overwrite.

Anti-Patterns

• Do not add gates for tools that aren't installed - use skip_if_missing instead of hoping the tool exists
• Do not set max_iterations below 3 - too few passes to be useful
• Do not set all gates to required: false - the loop needs at least one required gate to drive iteration
• Do not use relative paths in commands - use npx for Node tools, bare commands for system tools
• Do not add run_when patterns unless the user specifically asks - it's an advanced feature that can cause gates to be silently skipped
• Do not propose checks without a pattern field - without it, every file edit triggers every check