project-tick

name	project-tick
description	Single-pick dispatcher primitive for the henyey project pipeline. One tick = pick one actionable issue from the project board and dispatch the right specialist sub-agent for its current state. Used for manual single picks and `--issue=` recovery; the continuous orchestrator is `/project-loop`, which owns concurrency centrally. Use when the user asks to "run a tick", "pick up an issue", or "process one board item".
argument-hint	[--dry-run] [--state=<state>] [--issue=<num>]

/project-tick — single-pick pipeline dispatcher

You are a single-pick dispatcher for the henyey project management pipeline. Your job is not to plan, implement, or review anything — that is what the specialist skills do. Your job is to:

1. Read the project board.
2. Pick exactly one issue that is ready for work.
3. Self-assign it (for board visibility).
4. Dispatch the right specialist sub-agent based on its current state.
5. Stop.

/project-tick makes one central pick and dispatches one specialist. It is for manual single picks and --issue=<num> recovery. The continuous, parallel orchestrator is /project-loop, which reuses this skill's board query + filters + pick ordering, picks centrally, and tracks in-flight issues in an in-memory set. There is no GitHub locking anywhere in the pipeline — a single orchestrator never races itself, and standalone /project-tick runs are operator-initiated one-shots.

Project board

• Repo: stellar-experimental/henyey
• Project: number 2, ID PVT_kwDOD-vqsM4BWQnL
• Status field ID: PVTSSF_lADOD-vqsM4BWQnLzhRmYgI
• States (lowercase): backlog, ready-for-planning, planning, ready-for-doing, doing, in-review, done, blocked

Dispatch table

Status	Specialist	What it does
backlog	/triage	Validates the issue, labels it, advances to ready-for-planning (or ready-for-doing if trivial, or blocked)
ready-for-planning	/plan	Picks up the work; transitions to planning while drafting with parallel critics, then to ready-for-doing on convergence
planning	(no-op — actively assigned)	A /plan agent is currently drafting + running critics. Items in planning are always assigned; ticks filter them out automatically.
ready-for-doing	/do	Picks up the work; transitions to doing while implementing, then to in-review when PR is open
doing	(no-op — actively assigned)	A /do agent is currently implementing. Items in doing are always assigned; ticks filter them out automatically.
in-review	/review-pr	Two parallel reviewers + refute pass + CI; auto-merges on triple-green; bounces back or blocks otherwise
done, blocked	(no-op)	Terminal / human-triaged

Algorithm

Step 1 — Query the board

Single GraphQL call to fetch every open issue on the project with: assignees, status, labels, createdAt, linked PRs.

# Paginate — the project has >100 items once `done`/`blocked` accumulates,
# and without `--paginate` the picker silently goes blind to anything past
# the first page. See #2793-followup.
gh api graphql --paginate -f query='
  query($endCursor: String) {
    organization(login: "stellar-experimental") {
      projectV2(number: 2) {
        items(first: 100, after: $endCursor) {
          pageInfo { hasNextPage endCursor }
          nodes {
            id
            content {
              ... on Issue {
                number
                title
                createdAt
                assignees(first: 5) { nodes { login } }
                labels(first: 20) { nodes { name } }
                closedByPullRequestsReferences(first: 5) { nodes { number state url } }
                state
              }
            }
            fieldValueByName(name: "Status") {
              ... on ProjectV2ItemFieldSingleSelectValue { name }
            }
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
' --jq '.data.organization.projectV2.items.nodes'

If the query fails, retry once after 5 seconds. If still failing, exit non-zero — the operator will see the failure.

Step 2 — Filter to actionable items

An item is actionable if all of:

• content.state == "OPEN" (don't act on closed issues)
• fieldValueByName.name ∈ { backlog, ready-for-planning, ready-for-doing, in-review }
• assignees.nodes is empty (nobody is working on it)

Skip items where any check fails. Skip items whose status is planning (always assigned), doing (always assigned), done, or blocked.

Step 2b — Skip in-review items whose CI is still pending

/review-pr's only useful work when CI is pending is to post "Waiting on CI" and unassign. Picking such items burns reviewer-agent spawns just to find CI hasn't finished — wasteful. Filter them at the dispatcher:

For each in-review candidate after the actionability filter above, look up the linked PR's CI summary and skip the item if CI is still running.

Resolve the open PR number from the Step-1 GraphQL result — do NOT re-fetch via gh issue view. Step 1's board query already fetches closedByPullRequestsReferences(first: 5) { nodes { number state url } } per issue, including the state subfield. Critically, gh issue view --json closedByPullRequestsReferences does not expose .state on that field (only the GraphQL endpoint does — see do/SKILL.md Step 0), so a select(.state == "OPEN") against gh issue view always yields empty and Step 2b silently becomes a no-op. Consume the per-issue closedByPullRequestsReferences.nodes already in hand from Step 1 instead:

for ISSUE in <in-review candidates>; do
  # Resolve the open PR number from the Step-1 GraphQL node for this issue
  # (content.closedByPullRequestsReferences.nodes — already fetched, with .state).
  PR_NUM=$(echo "$STEP1_NODE_FOR_ISSUE" | jq -r \
    '.content.closedByPullRequestsReferences.nodes
     | map(select(.state == "OPEN")) | .[0].number // empty')

  # No open PR linked = broken state; let /review-pr handle the recovery.
  [ -z "$PR_NUM" ] && continue

  # Fetch the rollup once.
  ROLLUP=$(gh pr view "$PR_NUM" --repo stellar-experimental/henyey \
    --json statusCheckRollup --jq '.statusCheckRollup')

  # Count rollup entries (must be > 0 — empty rollup is suspicious, not "green").
  CI_TOTAL=$(echo "$ROLLUP" | jq 'length')

  # Pending: anything not yet completed. Handle BOTH casings AND StatusContext.
  # GH Actions CheckRun: .status in [QUEUED, IN_PROGRESS, COMPLETED] (uppercase)
  # StatusContext (legacy commit status): .status is null; .state in [PENDING, SUCCESS, FAILURE, ERROR]
  CI_PENDING=$(echo "$ROLLUP" | jq '[.[] |
    select(
      (.status != null and (.status | ascii_upcase) != "COMPLETED")
      or
      (.status == null and (.state | ascii_upcase) == "PENDING")
    )] | length')

  # Failed: any failure / cancellation / error / timed out.
  CI_FAILED=$(echo "$ROLLUP" | jq '[.[] |
    select(
      ((.conclusion // "") | ascii_upcase) as $c |
      $c == "FAILURE" or $c == "CANCELLED" or $c == "TIMED_OUT"
      or ((.state // "") | ascii_upcase) as $s | $s == "FAILURE" or $s == "ERROR"
    )] | length')

  # Skip this tick if CI is genuinely in-progress (entries exist AND some are pending AND none failed).
  if [ "$CI_TOTAL" -gt 0 ] && [ "$CI_PENDING" -gt 0 ] && [ "$CI_FAILED" -eq 0 ]; then
    SKIP_THIS_ISSUE=true
  fi

  # NOTE: empty rollup (CI_TOTAL == 0) → keep actionable; /review-pr Step 5 will refuse to classify
  # it as green (see "Empty rollup is NOT green" rule there) and bounce/block as appropriate.
done

Rule summary:

• CI green (entries exist, none pending, none failed) → actionable (/review-pr will merge).
• CI red (any failure / cancellation / error) → actionable (/review-pr will bounce).
• CI still running (entries exist, some pending, none failed) → NOT actionable this tick. Next tick re-evaluates.
• Empty rollup (zero entries — workflow never started, broken config, fork PR gated) → actionable so /review-pr can detect and either block or bounce. Never treat empty rollup as "green".
• No PR linked → actionable (/review-pr's no-PR recovery path).

Wall-clock latency for the first review is unchanged in expectation because CI (10–30 min) dominates reviewer-agent time (2–3 min).

Step 3 — Pick one issue

Order actionable items by (this numbered list is the canonical pick order — /project-loop Step D references it):

1. Urgent override — any OPEN issue labeled urgent sorts to the very top of the pick order, ahead of all state-priority tiers (e.g. an urgent backlog item outranks a non-urgent in-review item). This jumps the pick queue so a systematic urgent CI regression is drained first, not buried behind lower-priority work. Ties among urgents fall through to the rules below (state priority, then age).
2. Close-WIP-first state priority — descending: in-review > ready-for-doing > ready-for-planning > backlog. Reason: prevents PRs from rotting in review while fresh backlog items pile up. (planning and doing items are never picked — they are always assigned and filtered out.)
3. Label priority within state — descending: urgent > high > medium > low > (no priority label).
4. Age within priority tier — oldest createdAt first.

Pick the head of the sorted list. If the list is empty, print no actionable issues and exit 0.

Step 4 — Self-assign

Self-assign the issue for board visibility:

gh issue edit "$ISSUE" --repo stellar-experimental/henyey --add-assignee @me

No locking is needed. The orchestrator (/project-loop, or a one-shot /project-tick run) picks centrally and tracks in-flight issues in an in-memory set — it never races itself, so there is no flock, no sentinel comment, and no cooldown machinery. The self-assign is purely for board visibility (so the daily summary and humans can see what is in flight); it is not a mutual-exclusion mechanism.

Step 5 — Dispatch

Based on the issue's status, invoke the specialist skill as a foreground Codex sub-agent so its work stays in its own context window AND the parent waits for it:

• Call multi_agent_v1.spawn_agent with agent_type: "worker" and the prompt from the table below.
• Attach the selected stage skill file as a structured items entry (type: "skill", path: ".agents/skills/<stage>/SKILL.md", name: "/<stage>") so the child agent has the exact migrated Codex instructions even if its ambient skill index is stale.
• Do not set a model override by default. Codex sub-agents inherit the parent thread's model unless the operator explicitly requested a different model or there is a documented task-specific reason. If an override is explicitly requested, use Codex model names such as gpt-5.5, gpt-5.4, or gpt-5.4-mini; never use Claude model names.
• Call multi_agent_v1.wait_agent on the returned agent id and block until the specialist completes or reports a recognized failure marker.

Status	Skill item path	Sub-agent prompt
backlog	.agents/skills/triage/SKILL.md	Run /triage <ISSUE> and report the final board state transition.
ready-for-planning	.agents/skills/plan/SKILL.md	Run /plan <ISSUE> and report the final board state transition.
ready-for-doing	.agents/skills/do/SKILL.md	Run /do <ISSUE> and report the final board state transition.
in-review	.agents/skills/review-pr/SKILL.md	Run /review-pr <ISSUE> and report the final board state transition.

The missed-bug defense does not depend on forcing different model families. It comes from the adversarial refute pass built into /plan and /review-pr, plus the distinct critic/reviewer lenses those specialists run.

Critical: the sub-agent MUST be foreground from the dispatcher's perspective. Spawn it, then wait for it. The dispatcher's job is to block until the specialist either completes the full state transition OR posts a recognized failure marker (e.g. ## Plan: Triage Disagreement, ## Plan: Scope Mismatch, ## ⚠️ Plan: Force-Converged, ## Do: Plan Wrong, ## Do: Local Verification Failed, ## Review: Cycle Cap Reached, ## Review: No PR Linked) — anything less leaves work orphaned mid-flight (commit pushed but no PR open, etc.).

Wait for the sub-agent to complete. Do not try to summarize or second-guess its work — the specialist's commit history, issue comments, and PR reviews are the audit trail. After the sub-agent returns, report a one-line summary of the state transition it accomplished and exit.

Step 6 — Cleanup

The specialist owns its own state transition and cleanup:

• Moving the issue to its next state (via move-issue-status.sh).
• Self-unassigning on completion (gh issue edit --remove-assignee @me).
• Posting any required artifacts (triage report, converged plan, PR, review).

/project-tick has nothing to release — there is no lock and no sentinel comment in this pipeline. Once the specialist returns, the tick is done.

If the sub-agent fails (returns a failure marker), leave the issue's state and assignee as-is — the operator will see the stuck assignment in the daily summary. There is nothing to unwind.

Flags

• --dry-run — Print the pick and dispatch decision, exit without self-assigning or dispatching. For sanity-checking the priority ordering.
• --state=<state> — Restrict pick to one state only (e.g. --state=in-review to drain reviews first). Useful for targeted catch-up.
• --issue=<num> — Skip the picker and dispatch directly to that issue's specialist. Useful for manual recovery.

Examples

# Normal single pick.
/project-tick

# Show what would happen, don't act.
/project-tick --dry-run

# Just drain in-review queue (one pick).
/project-tick --state=in-review

# Force a specific issue (manual recovery).
/project-tick --issue=2698

Operational notes

• Single orchestrator, no locking by design. /project-tick makes one pick per invocation. The continuous orchestrator /project-loop owns concurrency by picking centrally and tracking in-flight issues in an in-memory set — it never races itself, so there is no assignee race, no sentinel-comment lock, and no cooldown files anywhere. Do not run two orchestrators concurrently; there is no mutual exclusion to protect against double-dispatch.
• Idempotency: if a tick is interrupted between self-assign and dispatch, the issue stays assigned to us and surfaces in the daily summary as "assigned for >N hours" — the operator unassigns it.
• No retry on specialist failure: if /plan returns with the issue still in ready-for-planning and assigned to us, that's a bug in /plan, not for /project-tick to paper over. The operator deals with it.
• No archival: archive-stale-done.sh runs as a separate scheduled GH workflow (.github/workflows/archive-done.yml), not inside this tick.

When NOT to use

• Do not call /project-tick from inside /plan, /do, /triage, or /review-pr — it dispatches to them, not the other way around.
• Do not use this for continuous processing — that is /project-loop's job (central pick, parallel fan-out, CI pipelining, self-reflection). Use /project-tick only for a single manual pick or --issue=<num> recovery.