Menu
Scope-aware GitHub PR review with user-friendly tone and trust tier validation
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Based on SOC occupation classification
| name | pr-review |
| description | Scope-aware GitHub PR review with user-friendly tone and trust tier validation |
| trust_tier | 0 |
| domain | code-review |
Review pull requests with correct AQE scope boundaries, clear communication, and actionable feedback.
<pr-number> — GitHub PR number to review. If omitted, prompt the user.gh pr diff <pr-number>
gh pr view <pr-number>
Read the complete diff and PR description. Do not skim — read every changed file.
Write a user-friendly summary of what changed and why:
For any skill changes, validate trust_tier assignments:
Check for:
gh pr review <pr-number> --body "review comments"
Comprehensive WCAG accessibility auditing with multi-tool testing (axe-core + pa11y + Lighthouse), TRUE PARALLEL execution with Promise.allSettled, graceful degradation, retry with backoff, context-aware remediation, learning integration, and video accessibility. Uses 3-tier browser cascade: Vibium → agent-browser → Playwright+Stealth.
WCAG 2.2 compliance testing, screen reader validation, and inclusive design verification. Use when ensuring legal compliance (ADA, Section 508), testing for disabilities, or building accessible applications for 1 billion disabled users globally.
AI agents as force multipliers for quality work. Core skill for all 19 QE agents using PACT principles.
Comprehensive API testing patterns including contract testing, REST/GraphQL testing, and integration testing. Use when testing APIs or designing API test strategies.
Migrate Agentic QE projects from v2 to v3 with zero data loss
Unvarnished technical criticism combining Linus Torvalds' precision, Gordon Ramsay's standards, and James Bach's BS-detection. Use when code/tests need harsh reality checks, certification schemes smell fishy, or technical decisions lack rigor. No sugar-coating, just surgical truth about what's broken and why.