| name | mathodology-dev-test-release |
| description | Use when validating the Mathodology skills-only repository or preserving archived knowledge about the former development, testing, deployment, packaging, and release workflows. |
Mathodology Dev Test Release Archive
Scope
This branch is skills-only. Its active validation checks are skill, metadata, link, backup, and tracked-file whitelist checks.
The former application build, CI, Docker, native service, packaging, installer, and release files are not present on this branch. Treat those workflows as archived knowledge unless recovered from Git history.
Active Workflow Validation
For award-level modeling workflows, this skill owns final gates rather than application builds:
- phase log exists and covers Phases 0-8
- every prompt requirement maps to a paper section or package file
- every reported number maps to code, data, derivation, or documented manual calculation
- every phase has specialist handoffs, lead synthesis, and an independent critic gate
- all blocker and high-severity critic findings are fixed before final packaging
- model selection considers at least three routes with rejection reasons for alternatives
- sensitivity or robustness evidence exists for important assumptions and key results
- final paper, editable source if required, code, data notes, figures, tables, README, AI-use statement, and checklist are present
- no local caches, secrets, raw scratch files, or unrelated artifacts are in the final package
Codex should run these gates with a dedicated critic or packaging agent.
Claude Code should run mathodology-submission-packager and then mathodology-critic.
Active Validation
Shared repository validation lives in ONE place: scripts/validate_repo.py
(pure standard library, no PyYAML). Do not re-inline these checks as heredocs in
docs or other skills; add or change a gate in the script.
Run every maintenance gate from the repository root:
python3 .claude/skills/mathodology-dev-test-release/scripts/validate_repo.py all
Run one gate by naming it: skills, metadata, links, whitelist, agents,
sync, or selftest. The script prints per-check PASS/FAIL lines and exits
non-zero on any failure.
skills / metadata: every .claude/skills/*/SKILL.md frontmatter (name ==
dir, lowercase-hyphen, Use when description) and every agents/openai.yaml
default prompt mentioning $<dirname>.links: relative markdown links, inline .claude/... paths, and
mathodology-<x> name references in tracked docs resolve.whitelist: only skills-repository files are tracked.agents: every .claude/agents/*.md frontmatter (name == stem, description,
tools, and any model in opus/sonnet/haiku/inherit).sync: each en/zh doc twin agrees on heading and code-block counts, and code
blocks are byte-identical after dropping CJK lines.selftest: proves each checker can both pass and fail on tempdir fixtures.
From a global skill install, run scripts/validate_repo.py from this skill's
directory instead of the repo-relative path.
Backup Check
Create and verify a skills-only backup:
bash .claude/skills/mathodology-whole-project/scripts/create-source-backup.sh
Then check the printed backup directory:
shasum -a 256 -c SHA256SUMS
tar -tzf mathodology-skills-<timestamp>.tar.gz | rg '^(AGENTS.md|\\.claude/skills/)'
tar -tzf mathodology-skills-<timestamp>.tar.gz | rg '^(apps/|crates/|packages/|scripts/|config/|installer/|tests/|data/|\\.github/)'
The last command should produce no matches.
Archived Dev And Release Knowledge
The former project used a multi-language application stack with service builds, contract generation, tests, deployment files, and release packaging. Those files were removed from the current branch.
If the user needs to rebuild or audit those workflows, first recover the relevant historical tree in a separate branch or worktree. Do not treat old commands as valid gates in the skills-only checkout.
