| name | plan |
| description | Use when a feature has ACs and specs and needs an architecture plan before implementation. Triggers — "/engineer.plan", "plan this feature", "plan the implementation", "design the architecture". |
plan
Produce a feature's architecture plan — Checkpoint 4, the most consequential architectural checkpoint. Where engineering authority over code design and performance is exercised: the agent proposes, the human decides.
Mixed mode — the agent proposes the architecture, the human confirms it, then the rest of the plan is drafted.
When to use
After discover-acs (Checkpoint 2) and atdd:atdd (Checkpoint 3). Produces plan.md.
If spec.md is missing, warn — planning should follow spec formalization — but the user may override and plan from acs.md alone (flag the skipped step in the handoff).
Not for: Given/When/Then specs (atdd:atdd); small changes to an existing plan (feature-edit).
Workflow
Step 0 — Entry gate. Before starting, verify the prior checkpoint is complete: run ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/dae_handoff.py <feature-dir> --through 3. On a non-zero exit, stop and surface the gap to the human — do not proceed.
Verify branch hygiene: run ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/dae_branch.py <feature-dir>.
On a non-zero exit, stop and surface the message to the human — switch
branches and re-invoke. The check honors the git.manual: true manifest
opt-out.
After the gate passes, show the pipeline breadcrumb: run
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/dae_progress.py <feature-dir> and present its
output to the human — it shows where this checkpoint sits in the DAE pipeline.
The breadcrumb is advisory: a non-zero exit or a missing progress.md never
blocks the skill. Then create one TodoWrite todo per workflow step below. See
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/progress-indicator.md.
- Resolve + load — resolve the methodology root + manifest via
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/dae_resolve.py (see references/resolving.md); load feature.md, acs.md, spec.md, CHARTER.md.
- Propose the architecture — draft only the Architecture section (components, data flow, where new code lives, coupling, key decisions + rationale + alternatives). Ground it in the actual code: prefer LSP —
workspaceSymbol to locate the components you'll touch, call-hierarchy (incomingCalls/outgoingCalls) to map coupling and blast radius, findReferences before proposing a change to a shared symbol — over grep, when an LSP MCP capability is available; fall back to grep + Read otherwise (see ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/code-lookup.md). Present it; iterate until the human confirms. Do not draft the rest until then.
- Draft the rest — once confirmed, draft the remaining sections; the human reviews the finished file.
- Charter Check — validate the plan against
CHARTER.md. Produce the two-part structured check: a compliance table (one row per charter rule, plus auto-rows for autonomy stance, verification independence, mutation policy, and — at high autonomy — performance budgets), and an Amendments section. Hard rule: never finish a plan with a ⚠️ deviation that lacks a matching amendment ADR. Either write the amendment inline, or stop and emit a handoff with human_action_needed: decision.
- Write
plan.md — frontmatter (slug, checkpoint: 4, plan_status, created) + sections: Architecture, Charter Check, Phasing, Performance budgets, Collaboration schedule, Execution modes, Test strategy. Test strategy must explicitly incorporate feature.md's validation_method if it carries a non-default value — e.g. if validation_method is "canary 5% prod for 24h, watch dashboard X," the Test strategy section names the canary phase, the dashboard, and the rollback trigger. If validation_method is absent, default to the standard DAE stack (acceptance + unit + mutation per charter) and say so explicitly.
- Generate
runbook.md if the plan touches infra/operator steps — provisioning (cloud project create, billing link, API enablement), secrets management, console-only configuration, manual DNS, deploy-day toggles. Use references/runbook-template.md. Each step has [ ] human or [ ] agent ownership, optional command: if runnable, and evidence: for completion. Deploy-related ACs (e.g. "site loads at staging URL") MUST NOT claim green until the runbook's prerequisite steps are checked off. If the plan has no infra/operator surface, skip — no empty file.
- Handoff — emit a summary.
plan.md has phasing (stages/slices), not a task list — tasks emerge from specs (one spec = one TDD cycle), driven by atdd:atdd-team.
Handoff
Emit per ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/handoff-summary.md. checkpoint: 4; recommended_next: "/atdd:atdd-team to implement against the specs". If a deviation needs a decision, human_action_needed: yes (decision).
The handoff MUST include the exit_criteria block asserting each of Checkpoint 4's exit criteria (Foundation Design Section 8) with verified_by, met, and evidence. For verified_by: tool criteria, the evidence MUST be the tool's actual output. The checkpoint is marked done only when every criterion is met.
Before stopping, apply the dispatch rule — see ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/handoff-dispatch.md. CP5 implement is a different role than planner; auto-dispatch the implementer subagent at autonomy medium/high; confirm-then-dispatch at low. Skip dispatch only if the plan emitted human_action_needed: yes (decision pending) — in that case stop until the human resolves.
References
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/handoff-dispatch.md — when to dispatch vs stop- Foundation Design — the structured Charter Check (Section 3)
- The DAE methodology page — execution model, autonomy levels, collaboration schedule
