source-command-audit

name	source-command-audit
description	Find all problems in the project - design, code, UX - and open issues

source-command-audit

Use this skill when the user asks to run the migrated source command audit.

Command Template

Audit: Comprehensive Problem Discovery

Scan the entire project for issues. Find problems, don't fix them. Open GitHub issues for everything found.

Rule: DO NOT fix anything. Only discover and document.

Scan Areas

1. Code Quality

• Dead code, unused imports, unreachable code
• TODOs, FIXMEs, HACKs left in code
• Weak typing (any, missing types, unsafe casts)
• Hardcoded values that should be config
• Debug artifacts in production (console.logs, commented code)
• Copy-paste duplication (DRY violations)
• Overly complex functions/files (hard to understand at a glance)
• Missing or inconsistent error handling
• Naming that doesn't convey intent
• Outdated or vulnerable dependencies

2. Business Logic Correctness

Code-correct ≠ Business-correct. Review business rules in the code.

• Region/locale logic: Does HK user see HK-specific data? (not China's 五險三金)
• Currency handling: Correct currency for user's region?
• Date/time: Timezone handling, week start day, date formats
• Tax/legal: Region-specific rules applied correctly?
• Permissions: Do access rules make business sense?
• Calculations: Business formulas correct? (not just mathematically)
• State machines: Valid business state transitions only?
• Validation rules: Match real-world business constraints?
• Default values: Sensible for the business context?
• Edge cases: Business-impossible states prevented?

3. Architecture

• Circular dependencies
• God objects/files doing too much
• Tight coupling between modules
• Missing abstractions
• Leaky abstractions
• Single points of failure
• Missing SSOT (multiple sources of truth)
• Inconsistent patterns across codebase

4. UI/UX Issues

• Confusing user flows
• Missing loading states (use skeleton, not spinner)
• Missing error states (with recovery actions)
• Missing empty states (with guidance)
• Inconsistent spacing/typography
• Non-responsive layouts
• Accessibility violations (contrast, keyboard nav, screen reader)
• Missing feedback on user actions
• Unclear CTAs or labels
• Information overload

5. Modern UI Patterns (Lack of)

• No inline editing (everything requires modal/page)
• No drag & drop where it makes sense
• No undo capability (destructive actions are permanent)
• No auto-save (users must remember to save)
• No keyboard shortcuts for power users
• No command palette (⌘K) for quick navigation
• Outdated inputs (dropdowns instead of combobox with search)
• No optimistic UI (waiting for server on every action)
• Jarring transitions (no smooth state changes)

6. Product Design

• Unclear value proposition
• Friction in core user journey
• Missing onboarding guidance
• Features that don't serve business goals
• Confusing navigation structure
• Missing progressive disclosure
• Power user needs unmet
• Beginner barriers too high

7. Performance

• Slow page loads
• Unnecessary re-renders
• Large bundle sizes
• Missing lazy loading
• N+1 queries
• Missing caching opportunities
• Unoptimized images/assets

8. Security

• Exposed secrets or credentials
• Missing input validation
• XSS vulnerabilities
• CSRF vulnerabilities
• Insecure dependencies
• Missing rate limiting
• Overly permissive CORS

9. Developer Experience

• Missing or outdated documentation
• Unclear setup instructions
• Flaky or missing tests
• Slow CI/CD pipeline
• Missing type definitions
• Confusing folder structure

10. Public-Facing & Exposure

• SEO: Missing/poor title tags, meta descriptions, structured data
• Social Sharing: Missing OG tags, Twitter cards, poor share previews
• Landing/Home: Unclear value prop above the fold, weak CTAs
• README: Missing badges, unclear quick start, no screenshots
• Docs: Incomplete, outdated, hard to navigate
• Analytics: Missing tracking, no conversion funnels
• Branding: Inconsistent voice, visuals, messaging

Process

1. Scan each area systematically
2. Document every issue found with:
   • Clear description of the problem
   • Location (file, line, or area)
   • Impact (High/Medium/Low)
   • Category label
3. DO NOT attempt any fixes
4. Open GitHub issues for each problem found

Issue Format

gh issue create --title "[Category] Brief description" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Problem
What is wrong and where.

## Impact
Why this matters. What could go wrong.

## Evidence
Code snippets, screenshots, or specific locations.

## Suggested Category
- [ ] Bug
- [ ] Tech Debt
- [ ] UX Issue
- [ ] Performance
- [ ] Security
- [ ] Documentation
EOF
)" --label "audit"

Output

After scanning, report:

Summary

Category	Issues Found	High	Medium	Low
Code	...	...	...	...
UI/UX	...	...	...	...
...	...	...	...	...

Issues Created

• #123 [Code] Description...
• #124 [UX] Description...
• ...

Critical Issues (need immediate attention)

• ...

Mindset

• Be thorough, not selective
• No issue is too small to document
• Assume nothing is perfect
• Fresh eyes find more problems
• The goal is awareness, not judgment
• Better to over-report than miss something