| name | issue-lifecycle |
| description | Drive the @swamp/issue-lifecycle model for interactive issue triage and plan iteration against swamp-club lab issues. Use when the user wants to triage a swamp-club issue, generate an implementation plan, or iterate on a plan with feedback. Triggers on "triage issue", "triage #", "issue plan", "review plan", "iterate plan", "approve plan", "issue lifecycle".
|
Issue Lifecycle Skill
Interactive triage and implementation planning for swamp-club lab issues using
the @swamp/issue-lifecycle extension model. This skill drives the model
conversationally — the human steers, you execute.
The model operates on swamp-club lab issue numbers. Every step records a
structured lifecycle entry against the issue in swamp-club and transitions its
status as the work progresses. There is no GitHub integration — the issue must
already exist in swamp-club before you start.
Core Principle
Never auto-approve. Always stop and show the plan to the human. Always ask
for feedback. Only call approve when the human explicitly says to proceed.
Repository Configuration
This skill reads repo-specific conventions from agent-constraints/ at the
repository root. If these files exist, they customize how each phase works:
agent-constraints/adversarial-dimensions.md — review criteria and dimensions
agent-constraints/planning-conventions.md — analysis and documentation
requirements
agent-constraints/triage-conventions.md — codebase exploration and bug
reproduction
agent-constraints/implementation-conventions.md — build, verify, and PR
conventions
If these files do not exist, the skill uses generic defaults documented in each
reference file.
Lifecycle Phases
Each phase has detailed instructions in a reference file. Read only the
reference you need for the current phase.
Phase 1: Triage (steps 1–4)
Read references/triage.md when starting a new triage or
resuming an issue in the triaging phase. Covers: starting the lifecycle (using
direct type execution to auto-create the model and fetch issue context in one
command), reading the codebase, classifying the issue, and reproducing bugs.
Phase 2: Planning (steps 5–7)
Read references/planning.md after triage is complete.
Covers: generating the implementation plan, applying repo-specific planning
conventions, and presenting to the human.
Phase 3: Adversarial Review & Iteration
Read references/adversarial-review.md
immediately after every plan or iterate call — no exceptions. Planning
and adversarial review are always paired: you never present a plan without
running the review first. Covers: challenging the plan across repo-specific
dimensions, verifying against the codebase, recording findings, presenting to
the human, and the iteration loop until approval.
Phase 4: Implementation
Read references/implementation.md after plan
approval. Covers: signalling implementation start, doing the work, verifying
fixes against the reproduction, creating the PR, and completing the issue.
Phase 5: Contributor Notification
After ship or complete, the lifecycle enters the notify phase. This is
where you decide whether to thank the issue author:
- If the issue author is an external contributor (not a repo collaborator),
call
notify to post a thank-you ripple mentioning them by handle.
- If the issue author is a collaborator, call
skip_notify to proceed
directly to done.
Check collaborator status with:
gh api /repos/systeminit/swamp/collaborators --jq '.[].login' | grep -qx '<author>'
If the author is NOT in the collaborator list, they are external — call
notify. Otherwise call skip_notify.
Classification Types
The triage method classifies issues into one of four types (matching
swamp-club):
bug — something is broken or behaving incorrectly
feature — a request for new functionality or enhancement
platform — admin-only platform infrastructure work
security — security vulnerability or hardening work
Two additional classification details are captured in the classification record
but do NOT map to separate swamp-club types:
isRegression — set to true when the bug previously worked. Implies
type: bug. Look for signals like "this used to work", "stopped working
after", or git history showing recent changes to the affected code.
- Low-confidence classifications — if you cannot classify the issue confidently,
use
confidence: low and populate clarifyingQuestions. Do not guess the
type — ask the human before calling triage.
Reviewing Plan History
To review a specific plan version:
swamp model @swamp/issue-lifecycle method run review issue-<N> --input version=<V>
To see all model data:
swamp model output search issue-<N> --json
Resuming a Session
If the human comes back to an in-progress issue, check the current phase:
swamp data get issue-<N> state-main --json
Read the phase field from the response. Do NOT call start to resume —
start unconditionally resets the phase to triaging, destroying progress.
Use this table to determine what to do next:
| Phase | Action |
|---|
triaging | Read references/triage.md |
classified | Read references/planning.md |
plan_generated | Read references/adversarial-review.md |
approved | Read references/implementation.md |
implementing | Link a PR with link_pr or call complete |
pr_open | Wait 3 min, then check PR: pr_merged if merged, pr_failed if failed |
pr_failed | Fix the issue, then link_pr (new PR) or implement (major rework) |
releasing | Check release build: ship when done, or complete as fallback |
notify | Check if author is external: notify to thank them, skip_notify to skip |
done | Nothing to do — lifecycle is complete |
The canonical phase list lives in the TRANSITIONS constant in
extensions/models/_lib/schemas.ts.
Closing Out a Shipped Issue
When a PR has already merged and the lifecycle just needs to be marked done:
- Check the current phase:
swamp data get issue-<N> state-main --json
- If the phase is
implementing, link the PR first:
swamp model @swamp/issue-lifecycle method run link_pr issue-<N> --input url=<PR URL>
- If the phase is
pr_open, record the merge:
swamp model @swamp/issue-lifecycle method run pr_merged issue-<N>
- If the phase is
releasing, ship it:
swamp model @swamp/issue-lifecycle method run ship issue-<N>
- If the phase is
notify, check if the author is external and either thank
them or skip:
swamp model @swamp/issue-lifecycle method run notify issue-<N>
swamp model @swamp/issue-lifecycle method run skip_notify issue-<N>
- For quick close-out,
complete still works from implementing, pr_open,
or releasing (transitions to notify, then use notify or skip_notify).
Key Rules
- Never skip the feedback loop. Always show the plan. Always ask.
- Never call approve without explicit human approval.
- Persist everything through the model. Don't just have a conversation —
call the model methods so state survives context compression and sessions.
- swamp-club is the source of truth. Every state transition posts a
lifecycle entry and transitions the issue status in swamp-club automatically.
You don't need to manually update the issue.
- Read the codebase thoroughly before generating the plan. The plan should
reference specific files, functions, and test paths.
- Follow the planning conventions for this repository. Read
agent-constraints/planning-conventions.md if it exists.
- Never open a PR without asking first. Present the changes summary and
wait for the human to confirm before creating the pull request.
- File unrelated issues immediately. If you discover a bug, code smell, or
problem during investigation that is NOT related to the current issue, file
it as a new swamp-club issue. Do not try to fix it in the current work span —
keep the scope focused.