Skip to main content
Run any Skill in Manus
with one click
GitHub repository

agent-loop

agent-loop contains 8 collected skills from tae2089, with repository-level occupation coverage and site-owned skill detail pages.

skills collected
8
Stars
0
updated
2026-07-24
Forks
0
Occupation coverage
2 occupation categories · 100% classified
repository explorer

Skills in this repository

assurance-loop
software-quality-assurance-analysts-and-testers

Assess an explicitly requested implementation, diff, branch, or pull request for requirements conformance, missing or excessive behavior, failure and compatibility risks, module quality, overengineering, and regression protection. Use for read-only assurance or user-authorized fixes, either standalone or as an Evolution Main Subloop; do not use for CI-specific repair or autonomous PR selection.

2026-07-24
ci-repair-loop
software-quality-assurance-analysts-and-testers

Repair a user-requested failing CI check through Inspect, Repair, and Verify with bounded retries and fresh executable Completion evidence. Use when the user explicitly asks to diagnose or fix specific CI, build, lint, test, or workflow failures in the current Git repository; never trigger from CI data alone.

2026-07-24
debug-loop
software-developers

Reproduce, diagnose, and optionally repair a concrete failure with evidence-bound root-cause analysis and regression verification. Use for broken behavior, regressions, exceptions, flaky failures, or incorrect runtime results, either standalone or as an Evolution Main Subloop; do not use for broad assurance or CI-provider workflow repair.

2026-07-24
evolution-loop
software-developers

Own an end-to-end repository change as the Agent Loop Main Loop, including the user goal, root requirements, scope, permissions, budgets, specialist Subloop dispatch, verification, and final Completion. Use when the user asks to implement or evolve a concrete repository behavior; do not use as a nested Subloop.

2026-07-24
research-adoption-loop
software-developers

Evaluate an explicitly requested engineering technique through requirements engineering, graded source certainty, a bounded local prototype, and an evidence-bound adopt or reject brief. Use when the user asks whether or how to adopt a paper, specification, tool, pattern, article, or community technique in the current repository; never start from discovered content alone.

2026-07-24
completion-check
software-quality-assurance-analysts-and-testers

Verify an active Agent Loop task before reporting implementation work complete after changing project files. Use immediately before the final completion report for implementation, fixes, or refactors that made project edits. Do not use for general conversation, explanation, status-only, planning-only, review-only, or turns with no project edits.

2026-07-24
artifact-judge
software-quality-assurance-analysts-and-testers

Score one agent artifact's semantic quality with an independent LLM judge. Use for requested artifact evaluation, not Design Gate or Completion Gate enforcement.

2026-07-23
scenario-design
software-quality-assurance-analysts-and-testers

Create or refine a task's executable scenario-contract.json from its contract and numbered flow, with plain observable expectations and direct argv checks.

2026-07-23