assessment

name	assessment
description	Provides a candid, evidence-based assessment and gap analysis against the user's target role requirements using the `honest-advisor` agent's norm/exception/strategy pattern.
triggers	["assessment","role readiness","gap analysis","what gaps do I have","am I qualified","honest assessment","how competitive am I for","do I meet the requirements"]

Invoke the honest-advisor agent to run a norm/exception/strategy assessment, then present the result as a gap analysis against the user's target role requirements.

Workflow

1. Confirm data exists

Read {user_dir}/CareerNavigator/profile.md. If it has no target_roles (or equivalent target-role fields):

"I need your target role(s) to run an assessment. Run /career-navigator:launch (or update your CareerNavigator/profile.md)."

Read {user_dir}/CareerNavigator/ExperienceLibrary.json. If the ExperienceLibrary units array is empty:

"Your ExperienceLibrary is empty. Run /career-navigator:add-source to add a resume first."

Optionally read {user_dir}/CareerNavigator/tracker.json to estimate how strong your evidence base is. If resolved outcomes are < 5, expect confidence to be Preliminary.

2. Invoke honest-advisor — assessment + gap analysis

For each target role in CareerNavigator/profile.md, hand off to the honest-advisor agent with:

• target_role_type for that role
• target_level (from profile if present; otherwise infer from role title)
• target_geography (from profile; if remote/national, treat as "Remote (national pool)")
• Instruction: "Treat your EXCEPTIONS as the concrete gaps vs. the target requirements in CareerNavigator/profile.md. Explicitly map each exception back to which requirement(s) are most likely under-covered (ATS relevance, narrative/seniority fit, or targeting)."

If multiple target roles exist, run the roles sequentially and label each section.

3. Present the gap analysis

Render the agent output as:

**Assessment (Gap Analysis)** — {Target Role}
Confidence: {Preliminary/Directional/Moderate/High} ({resolved_outcomes} resolved outcomes)

Target requirements (from profile):
- {requirement 1}
- {requirement 2}

Evidence-based gaps:
1. {exception headline + deviation direction}
   - Impacts: {which requirements this likely undermines}
   - Evidence: {cite tracker/artifacts/ExperienceLibrary evidence}
2. ...

Repositioning plan:
Immediate fixes:
- ...

Pipeline adjustments:
- ...

Compounding investment:
- ...

What would make this more reliable:
- ...

Keep it tight: at most 3–4 requirements and 2–4 gaps per role.

4. Suggest next step

Based on the highest-leverage gap:

• If ATS/relevance gaps: suggest /career-navigator:resume-score or /career-navigator:ats-optimization on the weakest artifact.
• If targeting exception (role/company mismatch): suggest /career-navigator:search-jobs using your refined role framing.
• If narrative/seniority exception: suggest /career-navigator:tailor-resume and then /career-navigator:cover-letter.
• If training ROI gap: suggest treating the recommendation as a plan and logging outcomes after 1–2 application cycles.