| name | Quote-to-Close Tracking |
| when_to_use | When connecting the dots across the full quote lifecycle — from a distributor quote or SalesBuildr proposal, through a PandaDoc document, to a closed-won CRM deal — to find exactly where a deal has stalled in the handoff chain. Use when: quote to close, where is this deal stuck, proposal status, quote status, deal not closing, follow up on quote, follow up on proposal, PandaDoc status, quote sent but no proposal. |
| description | Use this skill when tracing a deal's progress across the quote-to-close chain — a Pax8/Sherweb/Kaseya Quote Manager quote or a SalesBuildr proposal, through a PandaDoc document's sent/viewed/signed status, to a closed-won deal in the CRM. Detects and names exactly which handoff point a deal is stuck at (quote sent but no proposal document yet, proposal sent but not opened, proposal viewed but not signed, or signed but the CRM deal was never marked closed-won), across whichever combination of these tools is actually connected.
|
Quote-to-Close Tracking
Overview
A deal doesn't close in one system — it moves through a chain of handoffs,
and MSP quote-to-close chains stall at the seams between tools far more often
than within any single tool. A rep quotes hardware or licensing in a
distributor or quoting tool, turns that into a client-facing proposal in
PandaDoc, and is supposed to mark the CRM deal closed-won once it's signed.
Any one of those handoffs can silently drop: a quote gets built but nobody
ever sends the proposal, a proposal sits opened-but-unsigned for three weeks,
or — most commonly — a proposal gets signed and the CRM deal just never gets
updated, so it keeps showing as open in every pipeline report.
This skill's job is narrow and specific: given a deal (or a full sweep), walk
the chain and name the exact stage it's stuck at, not just "this deal seems
stale." That distinction matters because the fix is different at every stage
— chasing a rep to build a proposal is a different action than following up
with a client who hasn't opened their inbox.
The quote-to-close chain
Quote Proposal Document CRM Deal
(Pax8 / Sherweb / (PandaDoc) (HubSpot, or
Kaseya Quote whatever CRM
Manager / SalesBuildr) is connected)
[quote built] ──────▶ [document created] ──────▶ [deal exists, open]
│
├─▶ [sent]
│ │
│ ├─▶ [viewed]
│ │ │
│ │ └─▶ [signed] ──────▶ [deal marked
│ │ closed-won]
│ │
│ └─ (not viewed — stuck here)
│
└─ (not sent — stuck here)
Four distinct stall points, in the order a deal should pass through them:
- Quote built, no proposal document yet — a quote/estimate exists in
the distributor or quoting tool, but no corresponding PandaDoc document
has been created. The handoff from quoting to proposal drafting never
happened.
- Proposal sent, not opened — a PandaDoc document has been sent to the
recipient but its status has not progressed past
sent (no viewed
timestamp). The client hasn't engaged with it at all.
- Proposal viewed, not signed — the document shows a
viewed (or
multiple viewed) event but no completed/signed status. The client
opened it and didn't act — the most common place for a deal to go quiet,
because it looks like progress happened but nothing is actually moving.
- Signed, but CRM deal not marked closed-won — the PandaDoc document
status is
completed, but the associated CRM deal is still showing as
open (or in a pre-closed-won stage). This is a pure data-hygiene stall —
the sale is done, but pipeline reporting doesn't know it yet, which
pollutes every pipeline-health read until it's corrected.
Discovering available tools first
This skill is inherently cross-vendor by construction — it composes across
up to four tool families. Never assume all of them are connected. Before
tracing any chain:
- Call
conduit__search_tools to discover which of the following are live
for this org: a CRM (e.g. hubspot__*), a proposal tool
(pandadoc__*), and a quoting/distribution tool (pax8__*,
sherweb__*, salesbuildr__*, or a Kaseya Quote Manager tool surface).
- Scope the trace to whatever subset is actually connected — see
Graceful Degradation below for exactly what to report when a link in the
chain is missing.
- Never guess a tool name speculatively; an unrecognized tool call is worse
than stating a vendor family isn't connected.
Common Workflows
Trace a single deal through the chain
- Discover connected tools (see above).
- Starting from the CRM deal (or the quote, if entering from that end),
resolve the linked quote and/or PandaDoc document — match by client/
company name, deal name, or an explicit cross-reference field if one
exists (e.g. a PandaDoc document tagged with the CRM deal ID, or a quote
number referenced in deal notes). If no explicit link exists, match by
company name and approximate value/date, and say so — this is a
best-effort match, not a guaranteed one.
- Pull the quote status, PandaDoc document status (and its status
timestamps: sent/viewed/completed), and CRM deal stage.
- Walk the chain in order (quote → document created → sent → viewed →
signed → CRM closed-won) and report the furthest point reached and the
date it was reached — that combination identifies both the stall point
and how long it's been stalled there.
Sweep for stalled quote-to-close deals
- Discover connected tools.
- Pull all open CRM deals, and separately pull all non-terminal PandaDoc
documents (not yet completed/declined) and open quotes from the
connected quoting/distribution tool.
- Match records across systems by client/company name and approximate
value, flagging ambiguous or unmatched records rather than silently
dropping them.
- For each matched chain, classify into one of the four stall points above,
or "on pace" if the most recent transition happened within a reasonable
window (default: 5 business days since the last chain event before
calling it stalled — shorter than the CRM-only 14-day stalled-deal
threshold from
pipeline-health, because a proposal that's been sitting
viewed-not-signed for 5 days is a much hotter signal than a CRM deal with
no note logged).
- Report grouped by stall point, ranked by value within each group.
Graceful Degradation
| Missing / Unavailable | Handling |
|---|
| No CRM connected | Report quote and proposal-document status standalone (quote → document chain only); state plainly that closed-won correlation can't be checked without a CRM. |
| No PandaDoc (or other proposal tool) connected | Report quote status and, if a CRM deal exists, its stage — but state that proposal engagement (sent/viewed/signed) can't be assessed. This is the most common partial-coverage case; be explicit about the gap rather than guessing proposal status from deal stage alone. |
| No quoting/distribution tool connected (Pax8/Sherweb/SalesBuildr/Kaseya Quote Manager) | Start the trace from the PandaDoc document or CRM deal instead; note that the upstream quote-built stage can't be verified. |
| Only one of the three families connected | Report what that single system shows and state explicitly that this is a partial view, not a full quote-to-close trace. |
| No explicit cross-reference between systems (matching only by name/value/date) | Say so per match — "matched by company name and approximate value, not a confirmed cross-reference" — rather than presenting a fuzzy match as certain. |
| Multiple quotes or documents for the same deal (revisions) | Use the most recent one for chain status, but note if older un-superseded artifacts exist — an old sent-but-unopened proposal sitting alongside a newer one can itself be a hygiene problem worth flagging. |
Error Handling
None of the three tool families connected
State plainly that quote-to-close tracking requires at least one of a CRM,
a proposal tool, or a quoting/distribution tool to be connected, and that
none was found. Do not fabricate a chain.
Ambiguous match across systems
Flag it for manual review rather than guessing — list the candidate records
and why the match is uncertain (e.g. two open PandaDoc documents for
similarly-named companies).
Best Practices
- Always name the specific stall point, not just "this deal looks stale" —
the recommended action depends entirely on which of the four points a deal
is stuck at.
- Report the date of the most recent chain event alongside the stall point,
so staleness within that stall point is visible (a proposal viewed
yesterday and one viewed three weeks ago are both "viewed, not signed,"
but very different urgency).
- Be explicit about match confidence when correlating across systems by
name rather than an explicit ID — never present a fuzzy match as certain.
- Signed-but-not-closed-won is a pure data-hygiene finding — call it out
distinctly, since fixing it is a one-field CRM update, not a client
follow-up.
Related Skills
- Pipeline Health — CRM-only stalled-deal
detection; this skill extends that detection across the proposal and quote
artifacts sitting outside the CRM
- Warm Lead Routing — upstream of this
chain, for leads that haven't yet reached the quoting stage
