| name | wtf.create-pr |
| description | This skill should be used when a developer wants to open a pull request for a completed task branch โ for example "create a PR", "open a pull request", "submit this for review", "make a PR for task |
Create PR
Open a pull request for a completed task branch. Core value: reads the full spec hierarchy (Task + Feature + Epic) and the branch diff to write a PR description that explains why the change exists โ not just what it does.
Process
0. GitHub CLI setup
Run steps 1โ2 of ../references/gh-setup.md (install check and auth check). Stop if gh is not installed or not authenticated. Extensions are not required for this skill.
Skip this step if invoked from wtf.verify-task or another skill that already ran gh-setup this session.
1. Confirm the branch
Check the current branch and verify it is not main:
git branch --show-current
If on main, call AskUserQuestion (per ../references/questioning-style.md):
- question: "Which branch should I open a PR from?"
- header: "Branch"
- options: from
git branch --list (local branches)
Check whether a PR already exists for this branch:
gh pr list --head <branch_name> --state open
If an open PR already exists, print its URL and call AskUserQuestion (per ../references/questioning-style.md):
- question: "A PR already exists for this branch. Would you like me to update its description instead?"
- header: "Existing PR"
- options:
- Update description โ skip to step 5, targeting the existing PR for update via
gh pr edit <pr_number>
- Open a new one โ create a new PR anyway
2. Identify the Task (if any)
Try to extract a task number from the branch name (e.g. task/42-date-range-filter โ #42).
If found, call AskUserQuestion (per ../references/questioning-style.md):
- question: "I found Task # linked to this branch. Is that the right task?"
- header: "Linked task"
- options:
- Yes, that's correct โ use Task #
- No, use a different task โ I'll provide the correct issue number
If not found or the user says no, call AskUserQuestion (per ../references/questioning-style.md):
- question: "Is there a Task issue linked to this work?"
- header: "Linked task"
- options:
- No linked task โ proceed without a task link
- Yes โ I'll provide the number โ enter the task issue number
3. Lifecycle check (if Task linked)
If no Task is linked, skip this step.
Apply the absent-label gate from ../references/lifecycle-labels.md for the verified label on the Task โ recommended skill wtf.verify-task, header Verify first?. On Verify first โ follow wtf.verify-task passing the Task number as context. On Open PR anyway โ proceed.
4. Fetch the spec hierarchy
If a Task issue is known, walk Task โ Feature โ Epic per ../references/spec-hierarchy.md to extract Gherkin, Contracts, DoD, Test Mapping (Task) and ACs / Goal / constraints (Feature, Epic).
If no Task issue, skip hierarchy fetch. The PR will be written from diff context alone (step 5).
5. Inspect the diff
Determine the base branch using the same logic as step 8 (task/* โ parent feature branch; feature/* โ main), then collect the branch diff against that base:
git log <base_branch>..HEAD --oneline
git diff <base_branch>...HEAD --stat
This avoids including unrelated merged commits when the branch has a long history against main. Use --stat output only unless a specific commit message is ambiguous and cannot be resolved without the diff.
6. Draft the PR
Title generation: Spawn a subagent using the claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 model โ apply ../references/subagent-protocol.md for the spawn โ to generate a PR title per ../references/commit-conventions.md. Pass in the task title (if available), the commit log, and whether this is a breaking change. If the subagent returns nothing usable, generate the title directly following the same rules. Examples: feat(search): add date range filter, fix(payments): prevent double settlement, refactor(orders): extract fulfilment service.
Body: Load the PR template per ../references/issue-template-loading.md (verify .github/pull_request_template.md exists, halt-or-setup if missing). Fill in all sections:
- Summary: derived from the Task's Intent + Functional Description (or commit messages if no Task). Explain the why.
- Changes: grouped logical summary of
git diff --stat output โ not a file list.
- Test plan: if a Task exists, derive checklist items from the Gherkin scenario names. If no Task, derive from changed files and commit messages. At minimum one item per observable behavior changed.
- Related: closure keywords per
../references/commit-conventions.md. If a Task exists, include Closes #<task_number>. If the PR also closes the parent Feature (all sibling tasks already merged), add Closes #<feature_number> on its own line.
7. Review with user
Show the draft title and body. Then call AskUserQuestion (per ../references/questioning-style.md):
- question: "Does this look right?"
- header: "Review"
- options:
- Looks good โ create the PR โ proceed with PR creation
- I have changes โ adjust first
Apply edits, then proceed.
8. Create the PR
Determine the base branch from the current branch name:
task/* branch โ target the parent feature branch (feature/<feature-number>-<feature-slug>)
feature/* branch โ target main
- Other โ call
AskUserQuestion (per ../references/questioning-style.md):
- question: "What branch should this PR target?"
- header: "Base branch"
- options: from
git branch -r
Write the body to a temp file ($BODY) with the Write tool, then create the PR via the gh body helper (../references/gh-body-helper.md) so the description survives UTF-8 on Windows:
python3 .wtf/gh-body.py create --pr \
--title "<title>" \
--body-file "$BODY" \
--base feature/<feature-number>-<feature-slug>
python3 .wtf/gh-body.py create --pr \
--title "<title>" \
--body-file "$BODY" \
--base main
Print the PR URL.
9. Update the Task issue (if linked)
If a Task issue is linked, post a comment linking the PR:
python3 .wtf/gh-body.py comment <task_number> --body-file "$COMMENT"
10. Offer next steps
Call AskUserQuestion (per ../references/questioning-style.md):
- question: "What's next?"
- header: "Next step"
- options:
- Request a review โ add reviewers to this PR now (default)
- Done โ exit, no further action
On Request a review โ call AskUserQuestion (per ../references/questioning-style.md):
- question: "Who should review this?"
- header: "Reviewer"
- options: from team member usernames inferred from recent
git log authors or the repository's CODEOWNERS file
Then:
gh pr edit <pr_number> --add-reviewer <username>
For multiple reviewers, pass a comma-separated list: --add-reviewer user1,user2.
Print the PR URL.