name

show-me

description

Visualize a codebase or a change as a single self-contained HTML page so a human grasps the big picture fast — and, when something changed, sees the before/after core difference clearly, grounded to the actual code. Not limited to PRs. Use when the user says "show me", "visualize this", "help me understand this repo / this PR", "draw the architecture", "what changed and how", "I don't want to read the code, just show me", or asks for a diagram / walkthrough / presentation of code.

show-me — visualize code & changes for humans

When a human needs to understand code — a whole repo, a system, or a change — prose and raw diffs are slow. The scarce resource is not the agent's work; it is the reader's attention, reading speed, and trust budget. Spend extra agent effort to make the page skimmable, verifiable, and easy to act on: a single self-contained HTML page that conveys the big picture and, when relevant, the before → after core difference, with every claim clickable back to the real code.

This file is an index. Read the dimension that matches the task, then read references/html-craft.md for how to actually build the page.

Pick the dimension

Situation	Read	Produces
New repo / system — first time seeing it, don't know what it does or how it works	`references/repo-explainer.md`	A comprehensive HTML report: what it is, the mental model, architecture, data/control flow, key components — enough to orient before touching code
Targeted mechanism / tricky logic — user asks how one pipeline, extractor, state machine, scheduler, resolver, parser, scorer, or selection rule works	`references/mechanism-explainer.md`	A focused walkthrough: exact inputs, state transitions, branch rules, worked examples, non-examples, outputs, and code links
A change — already understand the repo; a PR / diff / branch / uncommitted edit needs explaining	`references/pr-explainer.md`	A change report: big-picture impact + before/after diagrams of the affected logic, diffs collapsed, grounded to code

Both share the same craft (look, self-containment, before/after technique, code grounding, serving) — that lives in references/html-craft.md.

Non-negotiable principles (all dimensions)

Optimize for scarce human attention. The first screen should let the reader decide in ~15 seconds: what this is, whether it matters, where to jump next, and what evidence supports the claim. Do not start with your process; start with the conclusion, model, risk, or action.
Big picture first. Lead with the one-paragraph mental model and a top-level diagram. Detail comes after, and only on demand (collapsed / linked).
For mechanisms, show an executable trace. When explaining extraction, selection, routing, parsing, scheduling, state machines, or scoring, include a small worked input and walk it through the exact branches. Also show at least one non-example: what looks related but does not create state or affect output.
Show the difference, not just the after. Whenever something changed, draw before and after side by side and make the delta visually loud (color + line style). The point is the core difference, not a redraw of the end state.
Ground everything to code, adjacent to the claim. Every box, node, and claim names a real symbol + path:line and, when possible, is a clickable link back to the source (GitHub blob URL or local file). Put the evidence beside the sentence, table row, or figure it supports rather than burying sources at the end.
Hand-draw the important diagrams. For the diagrams that carry the argument, prefer bespoke inline SVG — you control layout, and before/after stays aligned and legible. Mermaid is fine for quick/auxiliary graphs, but auto-layout fights you on careful comparisons.
Self-contained & offline. One HTML file. No build. Inline CSS/SVG; CDN only if unavoidable. It must open by double-click and survive being copied to another machine.
Editorial, not dashboard. Calm document aesthetic (see craft ref): readable width, numbered sticky table of contents, claim-carrying section titles, callouts — a thing a person can skim or read top to bottom, not a wall of widgets.
Hand back a clickable link. People look from a different machine. Prefer pushing the self-contained page to GitHub and returning an htmlpreview.github.io/?<blob-url> link — anyone clicks and sees it rendered, no download, no reachable server. Fall back to python3 -m http.server + a LAN/tunnel IP only when you can't push. (See craft ref.)

Anti-patterns

❌ Dumping the raw diff / file tree and calling it "visualized" — adds nothing over the host.
❌ Empty nodes ("process data", "handle request") — every node is a real symbol + location.
❌ Only the after-state when something changed — the user wants the contrast.
❌ A build step, a framework, or a dozen CDN scripts — keep it one openable file.
❌ Pretty but ungrounded — if a box doesn't map to code, cut it or label it as a concept.
❌ Evidence at the end — the reader should not hunt for the file, test, or command that makes a claim believable.
❌ Process-first narration ("I inspected... then...") — useful work notes are not the same as a useful explanation.

show-me — visualize code & changes for humans

This file is an index. Read the dimension that matches the task, then read references/html-craft.md for how to actually build the page.

Pick the dimension

Situation

Read

Produces

New repo / system — first time seeing it, don't know what it does or how it works

references/repo-explainer.md

A comprehensive HTML report: what it is, the mental model, architecture, data/control flow, key components — enough to orient before touching code

Targeted mechanism / tricky logic — user asks how one pipeline, extractor, state machine, scheduler, resolver, parser, scorer, or selection rule works

references/mechanism-explainer.md

A focused walkthrough: exact inputs, state transitions, branch rules, worked examples, non-examples, outputs, and code links

A change — already understand the repo; a PR / diff / branch / uncommitted edit needs explaining

references/pr-explainer.md

A change report: big-picture impact + before/after diagrams of the affected logic, diffs collapsed, grounded to code

Both share the same craft (look, self-containment, before/after technique, code grounding, serving) — that lives in references/html-craft.md.

Non-negotiable principles (all dimensions)

Optimize for scarce human attention. The first screen should let the reader decide in ~15 seconds: what this is, whether it matters, where to jump next, and what evidence supports the claim. Do not start with your process; start with the conclusion, model, risk, or action.

Big picture first. Lead with the one-paragraph mental model and a top-level diagram. Detail comes after, and only on demand (collapsed / linked).

For mechanisms, show an executable trace. When explaining extraction, selection, routing, parsing, scheduling, state machines, or scoring, include a small worked input and walk it through the exact branches. Also show at least one non-example: what looks related but does not create state or affect output.

Show the difference, not just the after. Whenever something changed, draw before and after side by side and make the delta visually loud (color + line style). The point is the core difference, not a redraw of the end state.

Ground everything to code, adjacent to the claim. Every box, node, and claim names a real symbol + path:line and, when possible, is a clickable link back to the source (GitHub blob URL or local file). Put the evidence beside the sentence, table row, or figure it supports rather than burying sources at the end.

Hand-draw the important diagrams. For the diagrams that carry the argument, prefer bespoke inline SVG — you control layout, and before/after stays aligned and legible. Mermaid is fine for quick/auxiliary graphs, but auto-layout fights you on careful comparisons.

Self-contained & offline. One HTML file. No build. Inline CSS/SVG; CDN only if unavoidable. It must open by double-click and survive being copied to another machine.

Editorial, not dashboard. Calm document aesthetic (see craft ref): readable width, numbered sticky table of contents, claim-carrying section titles, callouts — a thing a person can skim or read top to bottom, not a wall of widgets.

Hand back a clickable link. People look from a different machine. Prefer pushing the self-contained page to GitHub and returning an htmlpreview.github.io/?<blob-url> link — anyone clicks and sees it rendered, no download, no reachable server. Fall back to python3 -m http.server + a LAN/tunnel IP only when you can't push. (See craft ref.)

Anti-patterns

❌ Dumping the raw diff / file tree and calling it "visualized" — adds nothing over the host.

❌ Empty nodes ("process data", "handle request") — every node is a real symbol + location.

❌ Only the after-state when something changed — the user wants the contrast.

❌ A build step, a framework, or a dozen CDN scripts — keep it one openable file.

❌ Pretty but ungrounded — if a box doesn't map to code, cut it or label it as a concept.

❌ Evidence at the end — the reader should not hunt for the file, test, or command that makes a claim believable.

❌ Process-first narration ("I inspected... then...") — useful work notes are not the same as a useful explanation.