pyrs-sane

name	pyrs-sane
description	Invoke pyrs-foundation first. Check conceptual alignment by traversing upward from a pyramid to root. Triggered by ::sane P where P is an @-prefixed pyramid reference.

Before proceeding, invoke the pyrs-foundation skill to load the pyramid system rules.

Pyramid Sane

This skill is activated when the user issues ::sane P where P is an @-prefixed pyramid reference (e.g., ::sane @.event-bus or ::sane @./pyramids/event-bus/index.md).

Procedure

1. Resolve P — resolve the @-prefixed pyramid reference to its pyramid file (see Pyramid Identifiers in _foundation.md)
2. Read P thoroughly — understand its Purpose, Concepts, Contracts, Relationships, and Constraints
3. Traverse upward — read all parent pyramids from P up to ./pyramids/index.md
4. Consider the broad ecosystem — understand how P fits within the full hierarchy
5. Check for conceptual drift between P and its parents:
   • Does P's purpose still align with how the parent describes it?
   • Do P's contracts contradict or duplicate parent or sibling contracts?
     • Parents which re-state child concepts must be considered insane
   • Are all child references in parents present and accurate?
   • Are there orphan pyramids (missing parent links)?
   • Do constraints conflict across levels?
6. Report findings with evidence — when drift is found, cite specific pyramids, sections, or code locations. Do not give vague summaries. Then ask probing questions about how the user wants to reconcile:
   • Update P?
   • Update one or more parents?
   • Both?
7. Hand off to the change flow — once the user decides, route them to the appropriate command (::spec for pyramid changes, ::apply for code changes). Do NOT perform the resolution directly — the sane command surfaces problems and connects the user to the right command, nothing more.

Strictness

Audits must be strict. The following are all failures — do not silently pass them:

• Orphan pyramids — a pyramid exists but its parent does not reference it
• Missing parent links — a pyramid does not reference its parent in its Relationships section
• Conceptual misalignment — P describes behavior that contradicts or drifts from what its parent says P should be
• Missing sections — a pyramid is missing any of the required sections (Purpose, Concepts, Contracts, Relationships, Constraints)
• Scope violations — P describes behavior that belongs to a parent or sibling pyramid
• Missing or inaccurate provenance comments — code governed by P lacks // PYRS: <identifier> comments, or comments reference the wrong pyramid (for example, // PYRS: @.event-bus.actions). Exception: if P (or any of its ancestors) has a Constraint prohibiting code markers, provenance comments are not required for P or its descendants — but all other pyramids and branches still require them.
• Missing or stale placeholders — unbuilt dependencies lack // PYRS_TODO placeholders, or placeholders exist for dependencies that have since been built. Same code-marker exception as above applies.

Do not infer or assume alignment. If something is ambiguous, flag it and ask.