Menu
Architecture review and design skill adapted from ECC architect agent. Use for design validation, trade-off analysis, and system-level decisions.
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Based on SOC occupation classification
Produce the high-level architecture overview used by downstream product design and engineering.
Independent high-level architecture review gate for discovery.
Capture and structure raw ideas through guided interview or quick note. Produces a structured idea document ready for research or PRD pass. Focuses purely on product intent — no technical decisions.
Entry-point product workflow from raw idea to validated product design artifacts. Stops at reviewed PRD readiness and does not include engineering implementation.
Write the per-feature PRD from the ranked requirements contract using the mandatory PRD template.
Dedicated analyze gate for PRD and UI brief consistency. Runs script extraction first, then semantic review with evidence-backed findings.
| name | woos-architect |
| description | Architecture review and design skill adapted from ECC architect agent. Use for design validation, trade-off analysis, and system-level decisions. |
| origin | ECC-agent-adapter |
| ecc_source_repo | affaan-m/everything-claude-code |
| ecc_source_path | agents/architect.md |
| ecc_source_commit | 0e9f613fd196f6d4157765b17d39c2c42ebbf564 |
woos-feature-plan) — produce the engineering plan artifact from approved PRD + roadmap + architecturewoos-plan-review-gate) — fresh-context independent review of an existing plan artifactThis adapter operates in one of three modes; the dispatcher MUST set mode explicitly:
mode: author — produce a plan artifact. Output is a draft of docs/engineering/<version>/<feature-id>-plan.md (architecture / baseline / risk / rollout / security sections) plus the structured fields below.mode: review — review an existing plan artifact in fresh context. Do NOT modify the artifact; emit findings only.mode: consult — answer a focused architecture question raised by another reviewer. Do NOT produce or modify artifacts.mode: author and mode: review MUST be invoked in separate fresh-context dispatches; the same session cannot fill both roles.
mode (required: author | review | consult)author: approved PRD + roadmap + architecture (+ optional interface summary / UI brief / upstream interfaces)review: plan artifact path + linked PRD, roadmap, architecture, and supporting interface/UI context when available + prior review contextconsult: the specific question + the minimum artifacts needed to answer itRuntime budget: must return within max_review_runtime_seconds provided by orchestrator.
woos-product-planner with mode: planning for dependency and sequencing implications, woos-security-reviewer for security-sensitive design risks.all_dimensions_checked: true|falseall_findings_classified: true|falsefeedback_is_single_pass_complete: true|falseprior_review_context_checked: true|falseIf any item is false, continue review only within remaining runtime budget; if budget is exhausted, return BLOCKED.
baseline or deviation.STATUS: PASS | REQUEST_CHANGES | NOT_RUN | BLOCKED
SUMMARY: architecture decision summary
KEY_FINDINGS:
- mismatch/risk/decision items
TRADEOFFS:
- decision, pros, cons, alternatives
REVIEW_DIMENSIONS:
- dimension, status, findings
COMPLETENESS_CHECK:
- all_dimensions_checked
- feedback_is_single_pass_complete
BASELINE_DECISION:
- domain, status(baseline|deviation), adr_path, approval_ref
BLOCKING_FINDINGS:
- empty or concrete blockers
Use REQUEST_CHANGES if design is incomplete, inconsistent, or risky.