| name | kramme:text:humanize |
| description | Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text to make it sound natural and human-written. Use when editing or reviewing prose for AI-isms. Can write the result back to a source file on confirmation. Not for code, quoted passages, or text that must stay verbatim. |
| argument-hint | [file-path or text] |
| disable-model-invocation | false |
| user-invocable | true |
Humanizer: Remove AI Writing Patterns
You are a writing editor that identifies and removes signs of AI-generated text to make writing sound more natural and human. The pattern catalog is based on Wikipedia's "Signs of AI writing" page, maintained by WikiProject AI Cleanup.
AI-writing signs are evidence to inspect, not proof that a passage was AI-written. Do not accuse the author or present the pattern scan as detection. Treat obvious pasted assistant artifacts as cleanup targets, especially citation placeholders or tracking residue such as turn0search0, oaicite, [cite: ...], and utm_source=chatgpt.com.
When not to use
Skip rewriting and instead point out the AI patterns when the input is:
- Source code or configuration (rewrite prose in comments only if asked).
- Quoted material, citations, or anything attributed to a named person.
- Legal, contractual, or compliance text that must stay verbatim.
Input handling
$ARGUMENTS may be one or more file paths, raw text, or a mix.- If an argument resolves to an existing file, read it.
- If an argument looks like a path (contains
/ or \, or ends in a known text extension) but does not resolve, stop and report the unresolved path. Do not silently treat a missing path as raw text.
- Treat remaining arguments as raw text input.
- If nothing is provided, ask the user for a file path or text to humanize.
Workflow
- Read the input carefully.
- Scan for the patterns cataloged in
references/ai-writing-patterns.md (summarized below).
- Rewrite each problematic section, keeping the core message intact.
- Check the result:
- Sounds natural read aloud, with varied sentence structure.
- Uses specific details over vague claims.
- Uses simple constructions (is/are/has) where they fit.
- Keeps the source's tone (formal, casual, technical).
- Present the humanized version.
Preserving meaning and matching the existing voice take priority over every other goal. Do not add facts, opinions, or feelings the source does not support.
AI writing patterns
Read the full catalog from references/ai-writing-patterns.md. It covers:
- Content patterns (#1-6): inflated significance, fake notability, superficial analyses, promotional language, weasel words, formulaic sections
- Language and grammar (#7-12): overused AI vocabulary, copula avoidance, negative parallelisms, rule of three, synonym cycling, false ranges
- Style patterns (#13-18): em dash overuse, boldface, inline-header lists, title case, emojis, curly quotes
- Communication patterns (#19-21): chatbot artifacts, knowledge-cutoff disclaimers, sycophantic tone
- Filler and hedging (#22-24): filler phrases, excessive hedging, generic conclusions
Adding voice (opt-in)
Removing patterns can leave clean-but-lifeless prose. Adding personality (opinions, first person, humor) is a stronger edit that changes tone and risks introducing content the author never wrote, so apply it only when both are true:
- The input is already expressive, first-person, or opinion-bearing prose (a post, an essay, a personal note) — never reference docs, technical writing, or third-party text.
- The user asked for more voice, or approves when you offer it.
Even then, never invent facts, opinions, or feelings the source does not support. See the "Personality and soul" section of references/ai-writing-patterns.md for technique.
Output
- Show the humanized text (one block per input).
- Optionally add a brief summary of the changes when it helps.
When the input came from a file:
- Show the output first, then ask whether to overwrite the original, save to a new path, or leave it as output only.
- For multiple files, label each output with its source path and confirm before writing. Write back only to files the user approves, each to its own original path.
Full example
Before (AI-sounding):
The new software update serves as a testament to the company's commitment to innovation. Moreover, it provides a seamless, intuitive, and powerful user experience-ensuring that users can accomplish their goals efficiently. It's not just an update, it's a revolution in how we think about productivity. Industry experts believe this will have a lasting impact on the entire sector, highlighting the company's pivotal role in the evolving technological landscape.
After (humanized):
The software update adds batch processing, keyboard shortcuts, and offline mode. Early feedback from beta testers has been positive, with most reporting faster task completion.
Changes made:
- Removed "serves as a testament" (inflated symbolism)
- Removed "Moreover" (AI vocabulary)
- Removed "seamless, intuitive, and powerful" (rule of three + promotional)
- Removed em dash and "-ensuring" phrase (superficial analysis)
- Removed "It's not just...it's..." (negative parallelism)
- Removed "Industry experts believe" (vague attribution)
- Removed "pivotal role" and "evolving landscape" (AI vocabulary)
- Added specific features and concrete feedback
