Menú
Use when a contested set needs rulings - court procedure (advocate/skeptic/risk-officer), evidence requirements, sequential fallback, and escalation rules.
Instalar con Codex o Claude Copia este prompt, pégalo en Codex, Claude u otro asistente, y deja que revise la página de la skill y la instale por ti.
Basado en la clasificación ocupacional SOC
Use during any Hyperworkflows delivery merge phase - single-merger protocol, MERGE_TOKEN lifecycle, full-suite gating, and revert-and-quarantine rules.
Use when rendering any Hyperworkflows result to a human - the mandatory report format with verified/unverified/quarantined+grey buckets, coverage arithmetic, and evidence links.
Use when a unit of work has no executable acceptance (no test, no verifiable output) and you need to construct one - golden files, property tests, metamorphic relations, snapshot tests - or prove it infeasible.
Use before building or auditing against acceptance contracts - systematically finds missing acceptance dimensions so "all green but wrong" cannot ship through contract holes.
| name | adjudication-protocol |
| description | Use when a contested set needs rulings - court procedure (advocate/skeptic/risk-officer), evidence requirements, sequential fallback, and escalation rules. |
Disputes are settled by executed evidence, not by argument quality.
Court composition (agent team, >3 contested items): advocate argues each item's strongest case; skeptic EXECUTES every repro command attempting to break the claim — armchair doubt does not count; risk-officer assesses blast radius and second-order effects. One shared task per item.
Evidence discipline:
runs/<run-id>/verdicts/task-<task-id>.json with the raw exit codes the skeptic observed. The TaskCompleted gate bounces completion without it.adjudicate.mjs), never voted on. The court's job is to produce better evidence, not consensus.Volatility discipline: teams have no resume. Timebox the court; flush every ruling to disk the moment it lands; a crash loses only the in-flight item. Degrade to sequential main-session adjudication reading the same files whenever teams are unavailable — announce the degradation once, without alarm.
Escalation: only items still genuinely ambiguous AFTER execution go to the human — presented with both sides' strongest executed evidence and a concrete question, never "what do you think?".