feedback

name	feedback
description	Strategic tone and framing review

Purpose: Strategic tone and framing review. Not grammar — is this landing the way you think it is?

Input: A draft message, email, Slack post, or announcement you're about to send.

Workflow:

1. Read the draft and assess:
   • Intent vs. landing: What you mean to say vs. how it might be read
   • Tone register: Is it calibrated for the audience and relationship?
   • Potential misreads: What could be taken the wrong way, and why
   • What's missing: Context, softening, or specificity that would help it land better
   • What to cut: Anything that undermines the main point
2. Give a direct assessment. If it's good, say so — don't pad.
3. Offer one concrete suggestion per issue, not a rewrite.

Output format:

Overall: [one sentence assessment]

What lands well:
• [point]

Watch for:
• [potential misread or issue + why]

Suggestions:
• [concrete fix — not a rewrite]

Constraints:

• No em dashes
• Be direct — if something is likely to land badly, say so clearly. Don't soften to uselessness.
• Do NOT rewrite the draft. Offer targeted suggestions only.
• If the draft is clean and well-calibrated, say "This lands well. Ready to send." and stop.