executing-plans

name

executing-plans

description

Execute written implementation plan whose Tasks edit code, per-Task SAFE/CAUTION/UNSAFE git-signal verdict before edit AND code-style cascade for code-generation Tasks (style from silo authors, strategy+template from proven neighbors). Triggers on "execute the plan", "start Task N", "выполни план", "начни задачу", "run the plan", "implement the plan steps". NOT for one-off edits without a written plan. Wraps superpowers:executing-plans with tea-rags git-signal verdicts and tea-rags:data-driven-generation cascade.

dinopowers: executing-plans

Wrapper over superpowers:executing-plans. Adds pre-touch modification guard — before each Task's first Edit/Write, queries tea-rags impact signals for files Task will modify, produces verdict. High-blast-radius / hotspot / silo-owned files flagged before edits begin, not after broken commit.

Iron Rule

For every plan Task that modifies files, the pre-touch guard MUST run BEFORE the first Edit/Write/MultiEdit of that Task.

Core value: correct tool (semantic_search), correct impact rerank ("blastRadius" when codegraph on, {imports 0.5, churn 0.3, ownership 0.2} fallback when off), correct params (brace-expanded pathPattern over Task-local files, metaOnly: true), correct verdict ladder (SAFE / CAUTION / UNSAFE) + correct gating (CAUTION = confirm, UNSAFE = pause).

Task purely additive (creates new files, touches no existing ones): skip guard for that Task — state explicitly. Do not invent pathPattern to justify guard call.

Mandatory Step Order (DO NOT SKIP)

0. Step 0 — Worktree index clone (ONCE, at plan start): executing multi-task plan in git worktree → CREATE clone before Task 1 (see Step 0 below). Skip for single-task plans, explore-only, main-checkout work.
1. Step 2 — git-signal SAFE/CAUTION/UNSAFE verdict per Task before any edit
2. Step 4 — verdict-gating: STOP and ask user if any UNSAFE
3. MUST Step 5 — Code-Gen Cascade for code-generation Tasks (invoke tea-rags:data-driven-generation)
4. Step 6 — chain into superpowers:executing-plans
5. After each Task's commit — REINDEX worktree clone explicitly (mcp__tea-rags__index_codebase, incremental) so next Task reads fresh code. No background hook; skipping leaves later Tasks on stale payloads.

⚠️ Skipping Step 5 → ungrounded code. Skipping Step 6 → parent workflow never runs. Skipping per-Task REINDEX → silently degrades every later Task's tea-rags results.

Chaining rule: see CHAINING.md — every dinopowers:X redirects superpowers:X. NEVER bypass the wrapper.

Index freshness: see FRESHNESS.md and worktree-clone lifecycle in tea-rags/rules/index-freshness.md. NO background reindex hook: multi-task plan in worktree → CREATE clone at plan start (Step 0), REINDEX explicitly after EACH Task's commit so next Task reads fresh code. Run mcp__tea-rags__index_codebase manually to search uncommitted WIP.

Plus cross-plugin chain for code generation:

• tea-rags:data-driven-generation — invoked from Step 5 below for any Task that GENERATES code (new files, functions, classes, rewrites). Pulls strategy, template, silo-author style. Not a superpowers:Y redirect — additional MANDATORY step wrapper inserts.

Step 0 — Worktree index clone (worktree multi-task plans, once)

Before Task 1, executing multi-task plan inside git worktree (inline-driven OR subagent-driven) → give worktree its own index clone so per-Task searches see this branch's code, not main's. Run explicitly — user sees it:

tea-rags worktree create <name> --from <src-alias> --path "$PWD" --no-git

• <name> — short worktree label; clone registers as <src-alias>-worktree-<name>. --from names source project (registry alias worktree branched from); --path "$PWD" is worktree root; --no-git attaches to existing worktree dir instead of creating one.
• Gate: only for multi-task plan in worktree. Single-task plans, explore-only sessions, main-checkout work search main collection directly — no clone. Source index very large → state size, confirm before cloning.
• Subagent-driven: parent runs this ONCE; dispatched subagents inherit clone via worktree path.

Then after EACH Task's commit (Mandatory Step Order item 5), REINDEX clone so next Task reads fresh code:

mcp__tea-rags__index_codebase  project: "<src-alias>-worktree-<name>"

Full lifecycle (create → reindex → teardown) and cleanup-hook backstop: tea-rags/rules/index-freshness.md. Teardown runs in dinopowers:finishing-a-development-branch.

Step 1 — Extract Task's file list

From current plan Task identify:

Source	Example
Task explicitly names files	"Task 3: update a.ts, b.ts"
Task refers to symbols	"refactor Class.method()" → resolve via mcp__tea-rags__find_symbol to get file
Task refers to a small dir	"update all files in chunker/hooks/ruby/" → Glob

Output:

• taskFileList: relative paths Task will modify (typically 1-5)
• taskIntent: one sentence what Task does

If taskFileList empty (pure new-file creation): skip to Step 4 with verdict SAFE (new files only).

Step 2 — Pre-touch guard call

Issue ONE mcp__tea-rags__semantic_search call — SAME idiom as dinopowers:writing-plans Step 2:

project:     <alias from list_projects — RECOMMENDED, omit path when set>
path:        <current project path — fallback when no alias is registered>
query:       <taskIntent from Step 1>
pathPattern: "{taskFile1,taskFile2,...}"   ← brace expansion
rerank:      "blastRadius"               ← codegraph on; OFF fallback below
limit:       <taskFileList.length * 3>
metaOnly:    true

Codegraph gating for rerank: "blastRadius" (real fanIn + churn + bugFix) when prime ## Enrichment lists codegraph.symbols; fall back to { custom: { imports: 0.5, churn: 0.3, ownership: 0.2 } } (import-proxy, approximate) when that line absent.

Do NOT substitute:

Wrong tool	Why wrong
mcp__tree-sitter__modification_guard	Structural (AST) guard, misses git-signal blast radius (imports count, bugFixRate, ownership)
mcp__tea-rags__hybrid_search	Custom rerank is tied to semantic_search
Named preset "hotspots" / "codeReview" / "impactAnalysis"	impactAnalysis does not exist; these miss the blast-radius dimension. "blastRadius" IS correct when codegraph is on
One call per file, sequential	Brace expansion covers all in one
mcp__tea-rags__find_similar without a prior guard call	Finds analogs, doesn't return blast-radius signals

Do NOT pass:

• metaOnly: false — we want verdict inputs, not content
• Wrong rerank for codegraph state — "blastRadius" when on, the {imports 0.5, churn 0.3, ownership 0.2} fallback when off, matching dinopowers:writing-plans and tea-rags:data-driven-generation Step 6 for cross-skill comparability
• filter narrowing file set — pathPattern already scopes; filters hide signal

Results empty (files brand-new, not yet in git): verdict defaults to SAFE (new files). Do NOT fabricate blast-radius signals for untracked files.

Step 3 — Compute verdict per file, aggregate to Task verdict

For each unique relativePath in results, extract from payload.git.file.*:

• commitCount — churn magnitude
• bugFixRate — historical quality (percent of commits tagged as fix/bug)
• blameDominantAuthorPct (with adaptive label shared / concentrated / silo / deep-silo) — live-line silo indicator
• imports score (from ranking overlay) — blast radius proxy

Compute per-file verdict via this ladder. Use adaptive labels, not magic percentages — labels come from per-codebase percentile distributions in payload signal stats.labels, surfaced through get_index_metrics.

Verdict	Any of these triggers
UNSAFE	imports score top 5% of result set AND bugFixRate.label ∈ {"concerning", "critical"}; OR blameDominantAuthorPct.label === "deep-silo" (one author owns the live code)
CAUTION	imports top 15%; OR bugFixRate.label === "concerning"; OR blameDominantAuthorPct.label === "silo"
SAFE	none of the above

Task verdict = worst of per-file verdicts (UNSAFE dominates CAUTION dominates SAFE).

Compose guard block:

### dinopowers guard — Task N ("<taskIntent>")

| File | imports | churn | bugFix | owner | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| src/a.ts | 47 imports | 23 commits | 35% | Alice (92%) | CAUTION |
| src/b.ts | 3 imports  | 5 commits  | 0%  | shared (42%) | SAFE |

**Task verdict: CAUTION** — high-blast-radius in `src/a.ts`. Owner Alice has 92% dominance.

Step 4 — Gate the Task execution

Branch on Task verdict BEFORE invoking superpowers:executing-plans for this Task:

Verdict	Action
SAFE	Proceed — invoke superpowers:executing-plans for this Task without interruption
CAUTION	Surface the guard block to the user. Ask "Proceed with Task N?". Wait for explicit confirmation before invoking superpowers:executing-plans.
UNSAFE	Pause — surface block + recommend one of: (a) split Task into smaller Tasks, (b) add owner as co-author/reviewer, (c) require tests-before-edit. Do NOT invoke superpowers:executing-plans until user explicitly overrides.

Never silently convert UNSAFE→CAUTION or CAUTION→SAFE to "keep momentum". Verdict is circuit breaker.

Chaining rule reminder: when superpowers:executing-plans runs a Task, it may chain into superpowers:test-driven-development, superpowers:verification-before-completion, superpowers:requesting-code-review or superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch. Redirect each to corresponding dinopowers:Y wrapper — see Chaining rule section above.

Step 4.5 — Per-Task proven-template lookup (code-generation Tasks)

For Task about to execute, if classified as code-generation / code-modification (same heuristic as dinopowers:writing-plans Step 3.5: keywords "implement", "add", "write", "extend", "refactor", "modify"

• "function | method | class | helper | module"):

1. Plan document already carries **Proven templates** subsection for this Task (written by writing-plans Step 3.5) → USE that. Skip recipe re-invocation — writing-plans output canonical for this Task.
2. Plan does NOT carry per-Task templates (older plan, or written without Step 3.5 enrichment) → invoke tea-rags:extract-project-patterns with:
   • pathPatternL1 = deepest common ancestor of Task's Affected Files
   • behaviorQuery = Task title
   • limit = 5 Use returned templates[0] and locality directly.

Load chosen template into session as tea-rags:data-driven-generation Step 2 (TEMPLATE) input — so Code-Gen Cascade (Step 5) starts from correct reference without re-invoking recipe.

Skip clause: non-code Tasks (config, test, doc) bypass this step, proceed directly to Step 5.

Step 5 — Code-Gen Cascade (MANDATORY for code-generation Tasks)

After verdict gate clears (SAFE proceeds, CAUTION confirmed, UNSAFE overridden), classify Task by intent BEFORE invoking superpowers:executing-plans.

Task intent	Action
Generation: new file, new function, new class, new method on existing class, rewrite-to-new-template	MUST invoke Skill(tea-rags:data-driven-generation) BEFORE any Edit/Write
Refactor only: rename, move, extract, inline, reformat — no new logic	Skip Step 5 — no template/style needed
Modification only: change behavior in-place (bug fix, condition tweak, log message)	Skip Step 5 — agent edits in-context, no new pattern
Deletion: remove file, remove function, prune dead code	Skip Step 5 — no generation
Trivial: typo, comment update, single-token swap	Skip Step 5 AND skip wrapper entirely — direct Edit

Why MANDATORY for generation: without tea-rags:data-driven-generation agent generates code disconnected from project conventions. Misses:

• Strategy selection — DEFENSIVE for buggy zones, STABILIZATION for high-churn, CONSERVATIVE for legacy, STANDARD elsewhere. Reading SKILL.md text alone won't trigger this — only data-driven skill encodes the label-to-strategy ladder.
• Template via "proven" rerank — battle-tested code (long-lived, low-churn, low-bug, multi-author) found via custom weights {similarity 0.2, stability 0.3, age 0.3, bugFix -0.15, ownership -0.05}. Manual Read of one sibling file picks arbitrary example, not proven one.
• Silo-author style copy — when blameDominantAuthorPct.label === "deep-silo" data-driven skill instructs exact pattern match AND flags live-line owner for review. Manual style copy via Read skips silo signal entirely.

How to invoke (one Skill call, no parameters needed — skill reads area context from this conversation):

Skill(tea-rags:data-driven-generation)

If tea-rags:data-driven-generation reports it lacks area context (no overlay labels in conversation), it internally chains to tea-rags:explore for pre-generation gathering. Let it. Do NOT pre-fetch labels yourself — skill owns that workflow.

After Step 5 returns (strategy + template + style decided), THEN invoke Skill(superpowers:executing-plans) (or its TDD onward chain via Skill(dinopowers:test-driven-development)) to write the code.

Order matters: guard (Step 2) → verdict gate (Step 4) → data-driven cascade (Step 5) → executing-plans chain. Skipping Step 5 for generation Task = same severity as skipping guard for existing-file Task.

Red Flags — STOP and restart from Step 2

• "This Task is small, skip the guard" → if taskFileList has ≥1 existing file, run Step 2
• Substituted mcp__tree-sitter__modification_guard → tree-sitter gives structural safety, not git-signal blast radius; both useful but this wrapper git-first. Run Step 2.
• Named preset instead of custom weights → redo with {imports: 0.5, churn: 0.3, ownership: 0.2}
• Ran guard AFTER first Edit → wrong order; revert uncommitted changes if possible, restart from Step 2 before next Edit
• Silent downgrade of verdict → surface true verdict; let user downgrade if they want
• metaOnly: false on guard call → restart with metaOnly: true
• Let superpowers:executing-plans chain into raw superpowers:test-driven-development / superpowers:verification-before-completion / superpowers:requesting-code-review / superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch without redirecting to dinopowers:Y wrapper → intercept, invoke wrapper instead (see Chaining rule)
• Generation Task ran straight to Read sibling.ts + Write new.ts without invoking Skill(tea-rags:data-driven-generation) → revert (or pause before Edit), restart from Step 5. Manual sibling-Read is exactly what data-driven skill replaces with structured strategy + proven template + silo style.
• Invoked tea-rags:data-driven-generation for pure refactor (rename, move, extract) → over-trigger; adds no value when no new code written. Restart from Step 5 classification; refactor row says SKIP.

Common Mistakes

Mistake	Reality
One guard call per plan (not per Task)	dinopowers:writing-plans does per-plan. This wrapper is per-Task — scope matches edit granularity.
Use rerank: "codeReview" because "review before edit" sounds right	codeReview lacks imports weight — blast-radius invisible
Emit the guard block and proceed without gating	The block is not documentation — it's a circuit breaker. CAUTION waits for confirmation.
Treat UNSAFE as "just a warning"	UNSAFE pauses. User must explicitly override before edits.
Pre-fetch ALL plan files in one guard at plan start	Context stale by the time Task 5 runs. Guard is per-Task, just-in-time.
Invoke superpowers:executing-plans for the whole plan at once	Wrapper is per-Task — gate each Task separately
For new-file Task: Read sibling.ts then Write new.ts directly	Skips Step 5. Sibling-by-Read picks arbitrary example, ignores bugFixRate/blameDominantAuthor signals. Use Skill(tea-rags:data-driven-generation).
Generation Task → guard SAFE (new file) → straight to executing-plans	SAFE (new file) only resolves blast-radius gate. Step 5 is a SEPARATE gate — strategy + template + style still needed. Both gates must clear.