| name | neo-clarification |
| description | Use this skill when the user gives vague, emotional, fragmented, screenshot-based, or complaint-style requirements and wants them converted into structured specs, acceptance criteria, or clarifying questions.
|
Requirement Clarification Specifications
Apply the Inversion & Generator Pattern. Follow this protocol strictly to translate raw, chaotic user complaints and screenshots into clean, structured system specifications.
1. Perceive Phase
-
Information Extraction:
- Carefully read the user's text and inspect any attached screenshots or logs.
- Filter out emotional noise, frustrations, and blame.
- Separate objective facts (what is currently happening or visible) from user expectations (what they wanted to accomplish).
-
Identify System Boundaries:
- Determine the scope, domain, and potential technical layers affected by the feedback (e.g., frontend rendering, network APIs, database states, permission groups).
2. Reason Phase
-
Load Analysis Framework:
- Always read the external analysis guide before starting your deduction:
5w1h-framework.md
-
Context Reconstruction (5W1H):
- Map the extracted facts to the 5W1H framework (Who, Where, When, What, Why, How).
- Formulate logical hypotheses on the root causes of UI anomalies or system behaviors.
-
Identify Gaps:
- Pinpoint critical missing information (e.g., browser environment, specific action steps, parameters, error logs).
- Prepare a list of clarifying questions to ask the user.
3. Act Phase
Generate a structured "Requirement Translation and Clarification Report" strictly in Traditional Chinese (Taiwan). Follow these steps:
-
Load Output Template:
-
Compile the Report:
- Fill in the template using Traditional Chinese.
- Context Restoration: Present objective facts concisely without emotional adjectives.
- User Story: Use the strict format: "身為... 我想要... 以便於..."
- System Requirements & Hypotheses: Highlight key rendering, API, and validation checkpoints for the development team.
- Open Questions: List between 2 and 10 polite, precise, and constructive clarifying questions.
-
Self-Validation:
4. Communication Guidelines
- Maintain Empathetic Neutrality: Acknowledge the user's difficulty, but never agree that the system is "broken" or "a disaster" in the official report. Use neutral, objective descriptions.
- Strictly No Guesswork: Do NOT invent features that the user did not hint at. Ask clarifying questions instead.