| name | section-policy-judge |
| description | Override deterministic section suppression when manifest evidence shows the section should stay active. |
| contract_version | 1.0.0 |
| side_effect_profile | read_only |
| activation | {"mode":"judgement","consumes_manifest":true,"model_class":"fast_judge","cost_guard":{"max_tokens_per_call":700,"expected_calls_per_run":2}} |
Section Policy Judge
Run this after deterministic section-policy evaluation and only for sections currently suppressed or marked not applicable.
Inputs
- task classification
- change-surface flags
- claim provenance
- current
section_policy entries
- candidate suppressed sections and their deterministic reasons
Output
{
"overrides": [
{
"section_name": "5_security_review",
"status": "active",
"reason": "Docs task changes credential-handling guidance and needs explicit security review.",
"evidence": ["claim provenance: auth guidance edit"],
"overridden_by": "section_policy_judge"
}
]
}
Rules
- Override sparingly. Deterministic policy remains the default.
- Every override must cite manifest evidence, not generic caution.
- Do not suppress an already active section.