Reconstruct a repository as cited entry-to-test flows and bounded claims. Triggers: "codebase recon", "trace this codebase", "repository audit", "refresh the prior recon".
Reconstruct a repository as cited entry-to-test flows and bounded claims. Triggers: "codebase recon", "trace this codebase", "repository audit", "refresh the prior recon".
codebase-recon.v1 JSON validated by skills/codebase-recon/scripts/validate-output.sh with a companion cited report
Codebase Recon
Build a reusable, falsifiable model of a repository. This skill reports what
the tree and executable probes support; it does not edit code or issue a final
PASS/WARN/FAIL verdict.
Constraints
To prevent a floating recon, record the exact repository commit and local
source-of-truth precedence.
Because confidence is not evidence, type every material claim and cite each
fact and inference.
To preserve traceability, prefer a verified delta when a prior pack exists
instead of rewriting unchanged evidence as fresh discovery.
Modes, views, and lenses
One skill replaces a cluster of loose recon skills. Steer it with mode, view
emphasis, lens, and depth — do not invent a second skill for each shape.
Control
Values
Use when
Mode
baseline | delta
First pack vs refresh after a prior recon
View emphasis
mental model · bounded audit · pattern evidence · synthesis
Archaeology-style map, audit-style findings, pattern harvest, or executive synthesis
Lens
persistence · auth · CLI · build · test (one per pass)
Domain-deep cut instead of a shallow whole-tree sweep
Depth
quick · standard · deep
Orientation vs onboarding vs decision-grade evidence
Natural-language equivalents count. The durable pack still carries all four
views; emphasis changes what you spend tokens on and what the companion report
leads with. Pattern packaging beyond evidence pointers belongs in
pattern-mining. Binding PASS/FAIL stays with
validate.
Workflow
Record the current commit and the repository's local source-of-truth
precedence. Search for a prior recon pack before starting.
If no prior pack exists, use baseline mode. If one exists, verify its
still-valid claims against the current commit and use delta mode. Preserve
valid evidence by reference and describe only changed paths and synthesis.
Trace representative paths from entry point to domain logic, integration
boundary, and test. Prefer a few complete flows over a broad file inventory.
Keep four views distinct in the report: mental model, bounded audit, pattern
evidence, and synthesis. Label each claim fact, inference, or unknown,
assign confidence, and cite evidence for facts and inferences.
List inspected and uninspected scope. Write the JSON manifest and companion
report, then run the validator. Missing evidence and hidden coverage gaps are
contract failures, not prose caveats.
Docs-first entry-point tracing
Enter through what the repository declares about itself — README, architecture
docs, build manifests, CLI help — and only then verify those declarations
against the tree. Before the first broad search, list the declared entry points
and trace at least one of them to code. The named failure mode is grep-first
drift: opening with keyword sweeps builds a model of whatever happened to
match, and the recon inherits the search terms' blind spots instead of the
repository's actual shape. When declaration and code disagree, that is a
finding, not noise: record the doc's claim as inference, the traced behavior
as fact, and cite both.
One-domain-deep lens per pass
Each pass adopts exactly one lens — persistence, auth, CLI surface, build
system, test harness — and follows it from entry point through domain logic to
its tests before switching lenses. A pass ends in exactly one of two states:
the lens has one complete entry-to-test flow, or the report names the file and
line where the trace was cut and why. The named failure mode is the shallow
sweep: touching every directory at depth one produces a file inventory that
reads like a model but supports no claim, because no path was followed far
enough to falsify anything.
Citation floor: file:line or downgrade
The durable output doc earns its keep only if a future reader can re-verify a
claim without redoing the recon. Every fact cites file:line; every
inference cites the file:line facts it rests on. A claim that cannot be
cited is downgraded to unknown before the report ships — never shipped
uncited at its original confidence. The manifest validator accepts a bare file
path (it requires the path resolve to an existing regular file, so a bare
directory is rejected as a coverage gap), but does not require the line number;
hold the companion report to the stricter floor: a path without a line is a
pointer to homework, not a citation, and counts as a coverage gap in the
report's own terms.
When reconstructing a repository other than the one that ships this skill, pass
--repo-root <target> to the validator so evidence resolves against the target
tree rather than the skill's own checkout.
Output Specification
Artifact directory: the caller-selected output path, defaulting to .agents/scratch/codebase-recon/<run-id>/
Filename convention:codebase-recon.json with companion report
codebase-recon.md in the same directory.
Format:codebase-recon.v1 JSON manifest plus an evidence-cited Markdown
report covering the same commit, mode, flows, claims, and scope boundaries.
Validation command:skills/codebase-recon/scripts/validate-output.sh <codebase-recon.json>
validates the machine-readable manifest; the cited Markdown report remains
its human-readable companion.
Downstream handoff: pass both validated artifact paths to the requesting
research, planning, review, or documentation workflow; the consumer owns any
decision or code-change plan.
Baseline manifests carry at least one complete entry-to-test flow. Delta
manifests name an existing prior recon, prove baseline_verified: true, and
describe at least one changed path. Every manifest lists both inspected and
uninspected scope.
Evidence entries are existing file paths, optionally followed by a line number.
Delta manifests require an existing prior pack, baseline_verified: true, and
at least one described change.
