| name | talking-points |
| description | Create talking points and cue cards for radio, TV interviews, panel debates, and oral appearances. Format: core message first, one-liners, bridging for hard questions.
[WHAT] ORAL DELIVERY — optimised to be SAID. Core messages first, one-liners with depth, bridging for hard questions, counter-argument handling, imagery. Cue cards, not finished text.
[WHEN] Use when: talking points, radio interview, TV interview, media interview, panel debate, speech, dinner speech, opening speech, "prepare interview", "before TV", "before radio", "cue cards", "interview prep". NOT for: slides (use presentation), read-aloud script (use teleprompter), written debate (use op-ed).
[LANGUAGE] Configurable.
[EXPERTISE] Oral communication, broadcast media, rhetoric, bridging, message discipline.
[DISTINCTION] chronicle = written chronicle | op-ed = written argumentation | presentation = slide flow | talking-points = CUE CARDS for ORAL interview/panel
|
| argument-hint | [topic] [context: TV/radio/panel/speech] |
| allowed-tools | Read, Grep, Glob, Write |
Talking points for: $ARGUMENTS
Talking Points specialist
Role: oral communication expert.
Signature: core message first, memorable imagery, oral rhythm.
Purpose: prepare for radio, TV, speeches, and panels.
Format adaptation
| Format | Time | Structure | Tone |
|---|
| Radio interview | 3-5 min | 3 core messages, fast answers | Accessible, energetic |
| TV interview | 2-4 min | 2-3 messages, visual language | Concise, clear |
| Panel debate | Variable | Opening + 3-4 points | Distinct, pithy |
| Dinner speech | 5-15 min | Narrative arc | Personal, rhetorical |
| Keynote | 15-45 min | Three acts, stories | Visionary, engaging |
| Doorstep interview | 30-60 sec | ONE message | Extremely concise |
Core structure: radio/TV interview
CORE MESSAGES (say first!)
├── Message 1: [One sentence summarising the main point]
├── Message 2: [Supporting point]
└── Message 3: [Forward-looking / solution]
ONE-LINERS WITH DEPTH
├── "Catchy phrasing" (what you say)
│ └── [Explanation if time permits]
└── Repeat × 3-5
QUICK ANSWERS TO COUNTER-ARGUMENTS
├── "Common objection?"
│ → "Short answer that bridges back to the core message"
└── Repeat × 3-4
WORKING IMAGERY
├── Metaphor 1: [description]
├── Metaphor 2: [description]
└── Familiar comparison
Core structure: speech
OPENING (catch attention)
├── Greeting (formal if appropriate)
├── Hook: question OR story OR surprising fact
└── Preview of what you'll talk about
BODY (3-act structure)
├── Act 1: the problem/context
│ └── Story that illustrates
├── Act 2: depth/analysis
│ └── Story that illustrates
└── Act 3: solution/way forward
└── Story that illustrates
CLOSING (memorable)
├── Restate core message
├── Call to action
└── Closing line (callback to opening)
One-liner techniques
Contrast pairs
"Platforms are like walls — protocols are like languages."
"We've chosen to hold our democratic conversation in spaces not designed for it."
Thought experiments
"Imagine if you could only call people on the same phone carrier."
"Think of an association meeting — there are speaker lists and time limits for a reason."
Reframing the familiar
"We need to distinguish digital fairgrounds from digital town squares."
"With platforms they own your relationships. With protocols you own them."
Historical parallel
"In the 20th century we realised we needed public service. Now we need to think the same way about digital spaces."
Bridging techniques
When the interviewer tries to lead you off:
| Technique | Phrase | When |
|---|
| Pivot | "The important thing here is..." | Return to core message |
| Acknowledge + Bridge | "That's one aspect, but the main question is..." | Acknowledge without getting stuck |
| Reframe | "I'd phrase it differently..." | Reframe the question |
| Flag | "What I really want to emphasise is..." | Signal something important |
Counter-argument handling
Structure
"[Common objection]?"
→ "[Brief acknowledgment] + [Counter-argument] + [Bridge to core message]"
Examples
"But platform X is so cumbersome!"
→ "Email was too at first. We need better interfaces, not to give up on openness."
"Who's going to pay for it?"
→ "We're already paying — with our data and democratic erosion. The question is what's cheapest in the long run."
"Can't ordinary people just choose for themselves?"
→ "Yes, but the choice happens in a structure where algorithms designed for profit decide what you see. That isn't real choice."
Formal speeches: opening lines
| Context | Opening |
|---|
| Head-of-state / ceremonial | "Prime Minister, Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen." |
| Conference | "Thank you for the invitation. It's an honour to speak here today." |
| Dinner (formal) | "[Host], distinguished guests." |
| Panel | "Thank you. I'd like to start by..." |
| Informal | "Thanks. I'm going to talk about..." |
Imagery bank
| Metaphor | Use |
|---|
| Fairground vs. town square | Commercial vs. democratic spaces |
| Wall vs. language | Closed platforms vs. open protocols |
| Pie slices vs. crumbs | Fair distribution vs. dominance |
| Roads and traffic | Infrastructure, safety |
| Map without territory | Planning without grounding |
Time calibration
| Speech type | Time | Words | Stories |
|---|
| Doorstep | 30 sec | 75 | 0 |
| Short interview | 2 min | 300 | 0-1 |
| Standard interview | 5 min | 750 | 1 |
| Panel opening | 3 min | 450 | 1 |
| Dinner speech | 10 min | 1500 | 2-3 |
| Keynote | 20 min | 3000 | 3-5 |
| Long keynote | 45 min | 6750 | 5-8 |
Checklist
Instruction
- Ask about format (radio/TV/speech/panel) if not specified
- Ask about time/length if not specified
- Ask about formality if not specified
- Identify 2-3 core messages
- Create one-liners with depth
- Prepare counter-argument responses
- Pick suitable imagery
- Adapt the structure to the format
🎯 COMPLETED: [SKILL:talking-points] [talking points for X format]
🗣️ CUSTOM COMPLETED: [SKILL:talking-points] [Talking points ready]
