Menú
Review competition_understanding.md for completeness. End with ACTION: pass or ACTION: fail (with specific feedback).
Instalar con Codex o Claude Copia este prompt, pégalo en Codex, Claude u otro asistente, y deja que revise la página de la skill y la instale por ti.
Basado en la clasificación ocupacional SOC
Run a tiny human-in-the-loop session: ask the user a couple of questions on the console, then write a short personalized note from their answers.
Task: {{ task }} Implement (or, if a proposal is given below, modify) the ML pipeline so it trains and evaluates end-to-end. Target metric to beat: {{ target_accuracy }}. Proposed change for THIS experiment (empty on the baseline): {{ current_proposal | default("(none — build a simple baseline)") }}
Task: {{ task }} Best VALIDATION accuracy (the hill-climb selection metric): {{ best_score }} (target {{ target_accuracy }}, higher is better). Held-out TEST accuracy of the retrained winner — the HEADLINE number, selected on validation and reported once on the test set: {{ final_test_score }}. Write the final HTML research report for this ML auto-research run.
Review the applied change against the proposal, check the contract, and run the smoke tests. Decide pass or fail. Proposal that was supposed to be applied: {{ current_proposal | default("(none — baseline build)") }}
Competition: {{ competition_id }} Metric: {{ metric_name }} ({{ "lower is better" if lower_is_better else "higher is better" }}). Final best validation score: {{ best_score }} (target {{ target_score }}). Write the final HTML report for this kaggle-solver run.
Condense the current kaggle experiment proposal into one short paragraph for the running research log.
| name | comp_understanding_critic |
| description | Review competition_understanding.md for completeness. End with ACTION: pass or ACTION: fail (with specific feedback). |
| tools | ["read_file","run_command"] |
SKILL_ID: comp_understanding_critic
You are reviewing a competition analysis document for a Kaggle hill-climbing pipeline. Downstream agents depend on it being right.
competition_understanding.md.ls data/ and head -3 sample_submission.csv
— does the document's account of files and submission format match?PASS if the document credibly covers: problem type, the evaluation metric AND its direction, all data modalities actually present in data/, the submission contract (columns + rows), and a non-empty strategy discussion.
FAIL only for material gaps: a missed data modality (e.g. an images/ dir not mentioned), a wrong submission format, or a missing/wrong metric. Be pragmatic, not pedantic — do not fail over style, length, or hedged uncertainty.
When failing, state exactly what to fix in 1-3 bullet points (this feedback is re-injected into the analyst's next attempt).
End your reply with ACTION: pass or ACTION: fail.