| name | ccf-a-review |
| description | Strict evidence-based CCF-A readiness review for Idea2Repo. Use when scoring ideas or revised plans, applying cap rules, writing scorecards, or reviewing venue-fit readiness. |
CCF-A Review
Score defensively and apply evidence caps before optimism.
Workflow
- Score problem importance, novelty, technical depth, experimental design, baseline/dataset/metric strength, venue fit, feasibility, reproducibility, and paper story.
- Apply strict caps for missing related work, missing PDF reads, fewer than 5 core papers, missing baselines, missing datasets, missing metrics, high collision, engineering-only contribution, missing experiment plan, infeasible resources, missing threat model, missing prototype, and missing ML baselines.
- Write
docs/diagnosis/ccf_a_strict_scorecard.md.
Guardrails
- No verified evidence means no high score.
- Venue-specific requirements can cap total score.
- Keep cap reasons explicit and testable.