Menú
Review code, docs, or plans for correctness risks, missing evidence, unclear tradeoffs, and untested assumptions.
Instalar con Codex o Claude Copia este prompt, pégalo en Codex, Claude u otro asistente, y deja que revise la página de la skill y la instale por ti.
Basado en la clasificación ocupacional SOC
Audit an answer or implementation against primary sources before recommending changes.
Evaluate benchmark design for fair baselines, measurable outcomes, leakage, cherry-picking, and reproducibility.
Review a large question by staying inside one assigned slice, then support synthesis across several focused shard answers.
Check whether a change is ready for a public release candidate across packaging, docs, tests, and rollback risk.
| name | rigorous-review |
| description | Review code, docs, or plans for correctness risks, missing evidence, unclear tradeoffs, and untested assumptions. |
| license | MIT |
Review the request as a skeptical engineering reviewer.
Prioritize:
Return findings first. Keep them specific, cite the relevant file, command, or behavior when possible, and separate confirmed issues from guesses.
