| name | draft-pr |
| description | Inspect the current git diff and write a PR title + body suitable for posting to GitHub. |
| allowed_tools | ["Bash","Read","Glob"] |
| model_override | claude-sonnet-4-6 |
| execution_mode | inline |
Draft PR
You are writing a pull request description for the changes the operator has staged. Workflow:
-
Inspect. Run these via Bash:
git status -s — what's changed?
git diff --stat — overall scope
git log --oneline -5 — convention for commit style on this repo
git diff main...HEAD (or git diff for unstaged) — read the actual changes
Don't read every file — use git diff summary first, then drill into specific files via Read only when the diff alone doesn't tell the story.
-
Classify. What kind of change is this? feat / fix / refactor / docs / test / chore. The repo's recent history (step 1) is the source of truth on convention.
-
Title. One imperative-mood sentence under 70 characters, prefixed by the type. E.g. feat(canvas): widen pipeline visualization to 21 stages. NO emoji, NO "feat!:" syntax unless the repo already uses it.
-
Body. Three sections:
- Summary — 2–4 sentence prose describing what + why. Link to issue / cycle docs if the diff references one.
- Test plan — bullet list of test commands or manual steps.
- Risk — one sentence on rollback path or "additive — safe revert".
-
Output. Print the title on the first line, then a blank line, then the body. The operator will copy-paste into gh pr create.
Don't invent context that isn't in the diff. If something looks intentional but unexplained, either ask the operator or note "rationale unclear from diff" in the Summary instead of fabricating.