Menú
Use when you need to resolve an in-progress git merge/rebase conflict.
Instalar con Codex o Claude Copia este prompt, pégalo en Codex, Claude u otro asistente, y deja que revise la página de la skill y la instale por ti.
Basado en la clasificación ocupacional SOC
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match the user's request, PRD, or explicit spec?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".
Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Reproduce → minimise → hypothesise → instrument → fix → regression-test. Use when user says "diagnose this" / "debug this", reports a bug, says something is broken/throwing/failing, or describes a performance regression.
Use when the user asks for a rich explanation of a code change, diff, branch, or PR. Produces HTML output.
Walk the user through the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) as a guided, interactive code tour — the live Neovim counterpart to the `explain-html` skill. Drives the user's Neovim (scroll, highlight, virtual-text annotations) when connected, and degrades to prose with file:line references otherwise. Advances one stop at a time and waits for the user to say "next". Use when the user wants to be walked through a diff/branch/PR, asks for a guided tour or walkthrough of changes, or says "tour since X" / "lead me through the changes".
Implement a tightly scoped piece of work from the current conversation, an explicit request, or a spec file.
Build a throwaway prototype to answer a design question. Use when the user wants to sanity-check whether a state model or logic feels right, or explore what a UI should look like.
| name | resolving-merge-conflicts |
| description | Use when you need to resolve an in-progress git merge/rebase conflict. |
See the current state of the merge/rebase. Check git history, and the conflicting files.
Find the primary sources for each conflict. Understand deeply why each change was made, and what the original intent was. Read the commit messages, check the PRs, and check any referenced specs, PRDs, ADRs, or notes.
Resolve each hunk. Preserve both intents where possible. Where incompatible, pick the one matching the merge's stated goal and note the trade-off. Do not invent new behaviour. Always resolve; never --abort.
Discover the project's automated checks and run them — typically typecheck, then tests, then format. Fix anything the merge broke.
Finish the merge/rebase. Stage everything and commit. If rebasing, continue the rebase process until all commits are rebased.
