using-skills

name	using-skills
description	Auto-loaded at session start via SessionStart hook. Teaches skill invocation protocol, tool selection rules (look-at for media, skills for workflows), agent delegation patterns, and enforcement mechanisms. NOT user-triggered - provides foundational skill usage discipline for all sessions.
user-invocable	false
disable-model-invocation	true

Using Skills

Invoke relevant skills BEFORE any response or action.

This is non-negotiable. Even a 1% chance a skill applies requires checking.

CRITICAL: Skill Already Loaded - DO NOT RE-INVOKE

**If you see a skill name in the current conversation turn (e.g., `/dev`), the skill is ALREADY LOADED.**

DO NOT:

• ❌ Use the Skill tool to invoke it again
• ❌ Say "I need to invoke the skill"
• ❌ Call Skill(skill="dev") or similar

DO INSTEAD:

• ✅ The skill instructions follow immediately in the next message
• ✅ Just proceed to the next step
• ✅ Follow the loaded skill's instructions directly

If you catch yourself about to invoke a skill that's already loaded, STOP. Just go to the next step.

The Rule

User message arrives
    ↓
Is user explicitly invoking a skill (e.g., "use /dev")?
    ↓
YES → SKILL IS ALREADY LOADED
      ↓
      DO NOT invoke again with Skill tool
      ↓
      Proceed to next step (follow skill instructions)
NO  → Contains session keyword? (companion, new session, background session, etc.)
    ↓
YES → Invoke COMPANION skill FIRST — put everything else in the session prompt
NO  → Check: Does this match any other skill trigger?
    ↓
YES → Invoke skill FIRST, then follow its protocol
NO  → Proceed normally

Workflow Commands

Each workflow has two entry points — start fresh or re-enter mid-workflow:

Start Fresh	Mid-Workflow	Purpose
/work	resume the receipt-selected generated plan ({planFile, planHash}) with TaskList	Lightweight structured work: clarify, plan, verify, human review
/dev	/dev-debug	Feature development (7 phases) / debug, fix, re-test
/ds	/ds-fix	Data analysis (5 phases) / wrong results, notebook errors, revisions
/writing	/writing-revise	Writing projects / apply review fixes, polish
/workshop	/workshop-revise	Workshop presentations (4 phases) / revise slides, fix notes

IRON LAW: Companion Transport Priority

**When session keywords appear, invoke the companion skill FIRST. This is not negotiable.**

When the user's request mentions any session keyword — 'companion session', 'new session', 'separate session', 'background session', 'parallel session', 'companion', 'hand off to a session', 'in a new session' — the companion skill MUST be invoked FIRST, regardless of what other skills are mentioned.

The companion skill is a TRANSPORT mechanism. It launches the session. Other skills/tasks go inside the session's prompt.

"use workflows creator in a new companion session"
    ↓
WRONG: invoke workflows:skill-creator directly (or Agent tool)
RIGHT: invoke companion skill, put "use workflows:skill-creator" in the prompt

The rule: 'do X in a companion session' = companion launches, X goes in the prompt. NOT 'do X directly'.

Invoking X directly when the user said 'in a companion session' is NOT HELPFUL — the task runs in your current context, dies when the conversation ends, and the user cannot monitor or interact with it in the companion web UI. You did the opposite of what was asked.

Companion Routing Facts

• Agent tool with run_in_background is NOT a companion session: background agents die when the conversation ends and can't be accessed via the companion web UI. Substituting it for the companion skill gives the user the opposite of the persistent, monitorable session they asked for.

Skill Triggers (Can Auto-Invoke)

User Intent	Command	Trigger Words
Session/companion	companion	companion session, new session, separate session, background session, hand off, in a new session
Lightweight structured work	/work	do this properly, clarify and plan this, plan and verify this, small structured task, don't just wing it
Bug/fix	/dev-debug	bug, broken, fix, doesn't work, crash, error, fails
Wrong results	/ds-fix	results wrong, notebook error, reviewer feedback, data changed
Writing	/writing	write, draft, document, essay, paper
Media analysis	look-at	describe image, analyze PDF, what's in this, screenshot, diagram
Create/edit skill	workflows:skill-creator	create skill, improve skill, edit skill, add enforcement, audit skill, SKILL.md
Create workflow	workflows:workflow-creator	create workflow, design new workflow, break a new workflow into phases
Improve workflow	workflows:workflow-creator-improve	audit workflow, repair workflow, redesign workflow, migrate workflow, improve existing workflow
Create/edit plugin	workflows:plugin-creator	create plugin, scaffold plugin, new plugin, plugin structure, edit plugin
Workshop presentation	/workshop	workshop presentation, workshop slides, faculty workshop, workshop talk, slides from paper
Revise workshop	/workshop-revise	revise workshop, fix slides, update presentation, workshop feedback

Red Flags

• About to invoke a skill the user already invoked (e.g., "use /dev") → it is ALREADY LOADED; check for the <command-name> tag and just proceed.
• About to "gather information" or "quickly check" code before starting the matching workflow → that IS investigation; invoke the skill first. Scope ("just one file", "simple question") doesn't exempt you from the process.
• About to Read an image/PDF directly → use look-at.
• User said "use X in a companion session" and you're about to invoke X directly or via the Agent tool → companion skill is the transport, X goes in the prompt. Agent = subagent in THIS session; companion = separate server session.

Bug Reports - Mandatory Response

When user mentions a bug:

DO NOT:
1. Read code files
2. Investigate independently
3. "Take a look" without structure

INSTEAD:
1. Invoke dev-debug — it runs its own progress-gated subagent loop
   (no /goal needed; dev-debug uses main-chat-runs-the-test gating instead of an evaluator)
2. Follow the /dev-debug protocol

Any code reading before starting the workflow is a violation.

Skill Priority

When multiple skills could apply:

1. Transport skills first - companion session routes EVERYTHING else inside the session prompt
2. Specialized task shape next - bugs use dev-debug; analysis uses ds; long-form writing uses writing; workshop decks use workshop
3. Generic structure next - use work only for the bounded middle category that needs criteria, verification, and human review
4. Direct execution for trivial work - a lookup, one-line answer, or tiny edit does not earn workflow ceremony
5. Then implementation - follow the selected workflow's execution adapter

/work is not a universal wrapper. Specialized workflows win when the task clearly has their shape.

How to Invoke

Use the Skill tool to invoke skills:

# work: Lightweight cross-domain workflow with independent verification and human review
Skill(skill="workflows:work")

# dev-debug: Midpoint entry for dev workflow - debug, fix, re-test
Skill(skill="dev-debug")

# dev: Feature development workflow with 7 phases and TDD enforcement
Skill(skill="dev")

# ds: Data analysis workflow with 5 phases and output-first verification
Skill(skill="ds")

For implementation phases, set a /goal at the top of the phase (dev-implement walks you through writing the condition):

/goal All tasks in PLAN.md marked [x], [test command] exits 0, VALIDATION.md status = validated. Stop after [N] turns.

For debugging, invoke dev-debug directly; it runs its own progress-gated loop.

IRON LAW: Multimodal File Analysis

NO READING IMAGES/PDFS WITH Read TOOL. USE look-at INSTEAD.

The Rule

User asks about image/PDF/media content
    ↓
Is it a media file requiring interpretation?
    ↓
YES → Use look-at skill (bash call to look_at.py)
NO  → Use Read tool for source code/text

When to Use look-at

ALWAYS use look-at for:

• .jpg, .jpeg, .png, .webp, .gif, .heic - Images
• .pdf - PDFs requiring content extraction
• .mp4, .mov, .avi, .webm - Videos
• .mp3, .wav, .aac, .ogg - Audio
• Any file where you need to UNDERSTAND content, not just see raw bytes

Pattern:

# look-at: Extract information from media file with specific goal
uv run --script "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/look-at/scripts/look_at.py" \
    --file "/absolute/path/to/file" \
    --goal "What specific information to extract"

When NOT to Use look-at

Use Read tool instead for:

• Source code files (.py, .js, .rs, etc.) - need exact formatting for editing
• Plain text files (.txt, .md, .json, etc.) - preserve exact content
• Config files requiring exact formatting preservation
• Any file that needs editing after reading

Tool Routing Facts

• Read on an image costs 1,000+ context tokens even for a "small" file; look-at returns 50-200 tokens of extracted info. File size doesn't change this — content type determines the tool.
• look-at is FOR YOU, not the user — it applies whether or not the user asked for it. You can always fall back to Read if the extraction is insufficient; start with look-at and escalate.

Red Flags

• Passing an image, PDF, or screenshot path to the Read tool → use look-at.

Cost & Context Benefits

• Read tool on image: ~1,000-5,000 context tokens
• look-at extraction: ~50-200 output tokens
• Savings: 95%+ token reduction
• Speed: Faster responses, less context bloat

Example Usage

# look-at: Extract specific information from image file
uv run --script "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/look-at/scripts/look_at.py" \
    --file "$HOME/Downloads/screenshot.png" \
    --goal "List all buttons and their labels"

# look-at: Analyze diagram to understand data flow
uv run --script "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/look-at/scripts/look_at.py" \
    --file "$HOME/Documents/architecture.png" \
    --goal "Explain the data flow between components"

# look-at: Extract information from PDF document
uv run --script "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/look-at/scripts/look_at.py" \
    --file "$HOME/Downloads/report.pdf" \
    --goal "Extract the executive summary section"

Enforcement

Using Read on images/PDFs when look-at should be used results in:

1. Wasting context tokens unnecessarily
2. Making conversations slower
3. Ignoring available optimization tools
4. Violating the tool selection protocol

Validate before calling Read: Ask "Is this a media file?" If yes, invoke look-at instead.

IRON LAW: Following Skill Instructions

WHEN A SKILL LOADS, YOU MUST FOLLOW ITS EXACT INSTRUCTIONS.

Skills contain specific patterns, required parameters, and enforcement rules. Skipping these requirements defeats the purpose of loading the skill.

The Rule

Skill loads successfully
    ↓
Read the skill's requirements carefully
    ↓
Follow ALL instructions, including:
    - Required tool parameters (descriptions, timeouts, etc.)
    - Specific command patterns
    - Enforcement patterns (Iron Laws, Red Flags)
    - Step sequences
    ↓
Execute using the skill's exact patterns

Common Violations

Bash Description Parameter:

When a skill requires description parameter on Bash calls (like look-at), you MUST include it:

# ❌ WRONG: No description parameter
uv run --script "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/look-at/scripts/look_at.py" \
    --file "/path/to/file.pdf" \
    --goal "Extract title"

# ✅ CORRECT: With description parameter as skill requires
Bash(
    command='uv run --script "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/look-at/scripts/look_at.py" --file "/path/to/file.pdf" --goal "Extract title"',
    description="look-at: Extract title"
)

Red Flags

• About to call Bash without the description parameter when the skill requires it → add it.
• About to modify a skill's required pattern "to be simpler" → follow the skill or don't load it.

Why This Matters

Skills encode:

1. Tested patterns - Proven to work in production
2. Optimization - Context/token savings, clean output
3. Enforcement - Prevent common mistakes
4. UX standards - Consistent, professional output

When you skip skill instructions:

• ❌ You waste the effort of loading the skill
• ❌ You create messy, unprofessional output
• ❌ You miss optimizations (context savings, speed)
• ❌ You violate user expectations
• ❌ You make debugging harder

The skill loaded for a reason - follow it completely.

IRON LAW: Creator Activity Routing

NO CREATING OR SUBSTANTIALLY EDITING SKILLS, PLUGINS, OR WORKFLOWS WITHOUT THE WORKFLOWS WRAPPER.

The workflows plugin provides wrapper skills that add two layers on top of built-in creator tools:

1. Behavioral enforcement — superpowers patterns (Iron Laws, rationalization tables, red flags, enforcement checklist audit)
2. Mechanical enforcement — PostToolUse hooks (plugin-validate.py, validate-skill-paths.py) that fire on every Write/Edit

Using built-in creators directly bypasses both layers. This applies globally — any project, not just the workflows plugin.

"Substantial" means: adding/removing sections, changing enforcement patterns, altering process flow, adding/modifying hooks. Typo fixes, version bumps, and single-line clarifications are exempt.

The Rule

About to create or substantially edit a skill/plugin/workflow
    ↓
What type of creator activity?
    ↓
    +---> Skill creation/editing ------> Invoke workflows:skill-creator
    |
    +---> New workflow creation -------> Invoke workflows:workflow-creator
    |
    +---> Existing workflow change ----> Invoke workflows:workflow-creator-improve
    |
    +---> Plugin creation/editing ------> Invoke workflows:plugin-creator
    ↓
Follow the wrapper skill's full process
    ↓
DO NOT invoke built-in creators directly (skill-creator:skill-creator,
plugin-dev:skill-development, plugin-dev:plugin-structure, etc.)

Creator Routing Table

Activity	Route To	Wraps
Create/edit a skill	workflows:skill-creator	skill-creator:skill-creator
Create a workflow	workflows:workflow-creator	shared-v1 fresh entry
Audit/edit/migrate a workflow	workflows:workflow-creator-improve	shared-v1 corrective entry
Create/edit a plugin	workflows:plugin-creator	plugin-dev:create-plugin

Trigger words: see Skill Triggers table above.

Red Flags

• About to invoke a built-in creator directly (skill-creator:skill-creator, plugin-dev:*, etc.) → use the workflows wrapper. The built-in has no PostToolUse hooks; path errors and structural issues go uncaught.
• Editing enforcement patterns without the wrapper → this is exactly when the audit matters most.

Advanced Agent Harnessing Patterns

For detailed oh-my-opencode production patterns including:

• Background + parallel execution (3x speedup)
• Tool restrictions for focused agents
• Structured delegation templates
• Failure recovery protocol
• Environment context injection
• Cost classification system
• Metadata-driven prompts

See: references/agent-harnessing.md

Quick reference:

• Tool restrictions: references/tool-restrictions.md
• Delegation template: references/delegation-template.md
• Metadata infrastructure: references/skill-metadata.py

Based on: obra/superpowers and oh-my-opencode production patterns.