con un clic
gsd-health
Diagnose planning directory health and optionally repair issues
Instalar con Codex o Claude Copia este prompt, pégalo en Codex, Claude u otro asistente, y deja que revise la página de la skill y la instale por ti.
Menú
Diagnose planning directory health and optionally repair issues
Instalar con Codex o Claude Copia este prompt, pégalo en Codex, Claude u otro asistente, y deja que revise la página de la skill y la instale por ti.
Basado en la clasificación ocupacional SOC
Generate tests for a completed phase based on UAT criteria and implementation
Generate an AI-SPEC.md design contract for phases that involve building AI systems.
Autonomous audit-to-fix pipeline — find issues, classify, fix, test, commit
Audit milestone completion against original intent before archiving
Cross-phase audit of all outstanding UAT and verification items
Run all remaining phases autonomously — discuss→plan→execute per phase
| name | gsd-health |
| description | Diagnose planning directory health and optionally repair issues |
| metadata | {"short-description":"Diagnose planning directory health and optionally repair issues"} |
<codex_skill_adapter>
$gsd-health.$gsd-health as {{GSD_ARGS}}.{{GSD_ARGS}} as empty.GSD workflows use AskUserQuestion (Claude Code syntax). Translate to Codex request_user_input:
Parameter mapping:
header → headerquestion → question"Label" — description → {label: "Label", description: "description"}id from header: lowercase, replace spaces with underscoresBatched calls:
AskUserQuestion([q1, q2]) → single request_user_input with multiple entries in questions[]Multi-select workaround:
multiSelect. Use sequential single-selects, or present a numbered freeform list asking the user to enter comma-separated numbers.Execute mode fallback:
request_user_input is rejected or unavailable, you MUST stop and present the questions as a plain-text numbered list, then wait for the user's reply. Do NOT pick a default and continue (#3018).--auto or --all),
(b) the user has explicitly approved a specific default for this question, or
(c) the workflow's documented contract says defaults are safe (e.g. autonomous lifecycle paths).GSD workflows use Task(...) (Claude Code syntax). Translate to Codex collaboration tools:
Direct mapping:
Task(subagent_type="X", prompt="Y") → spawn_agent(agent_type="X", message="Y")Task(model="...") → omit. spawn_agent has no inline model parameter;
GSD embeds the resolved per-agent model directly into each agent's .toml
at install time so model_overrides from .planning/config.json and
~/.gsd/defaults.json are honored automatically by Codex's agent router.fork_context: false by default — GSD agents load their own context via <files_to_read> blocksTask(isolation="worktree") / Agent(isolation="worktree") → no direct Codex mapping.
Codex spawn_agent does not create or bind a git worktree automatically.
Workflows that require this isolation must fail closed or use an explicit
manual worktree protocol before spawning (#3360).Spawn restriction:
spawn_agent to cases where the user has explicitly
requested sub-agents. When automatic spawning is not permitted, do the
work inline in the current agent rather than attempting to force a spawn.Parallel fan-out:
wait(ids) for all to completeResult parsing:
CHECKPOINT, PLAN COMPLETE, SUMMARY, etc.close_agent(id) after collecting results from each agent
</codex_skill_adapter>--context runs an orthogonal check: the running session's context utilization. The workflow asks for the model's tokensUsed + contextWindow, calls gsd-sdk query validate.context, and renders one of three states:
| Utilization | State | Action |
|---|---|---|
| < 60% | healthy | no action — context is comfortable |
| 60% – 70% | warning | recommend $gsd-thread to start fresh |
| ≥ 70% | critical | reasoning quality may degrade past the fracture point |
<execution_context> @/Users/lmarques/Dev/efx-mux/.codex/get-shit-done/workflows/health.md </execution_context>
Execute end-to-end. Parse `--repair` and `--context` flags from arguments and pass to workflow.