cybernetic-brainstorming-workflow

name	cybernetic-brainstorming-workflow
description	Use when cybernetic requirements or solution design has a genuinely open search space and needs candidate paths, trade-offs, and discriminating questions before commitment.

Cybernetic Brainstorming Workflow

Purpose

Explore competing interpretations or solution paths before commitment while preserving requirement provenance and authority.

Workflow

1. State the unresolved semantic or design debt and its source.
2. Generate a small set of materially different candidate paths.
3. Compare feasibility, risk, reversibility, evidence burden, and claim scope.
4. Search for the smallest counterexample that invalidates each candidate.
5. Identify which uncertainty can be resolved by inspection or experiment and which requires a true human semantic decision.
6. Feed the surviving paths and unresolved debts back to requirements or design.

Boundaries

• This workflow is optional and does not run for already-bounded work.
• It does not approve requirements, write runtime plans, or execute target work.
• It does not turn agent-resolvable investigation into a user question.
• Candidate paths remain hypotheses until bound into approved control artifacts.