| name | devils-advocate |
| description | AI-powered Devil's Advocate that challenges your opinions with logical counter-arguments. Uses web search to find contradictory evidence and helps you avoid echo chambers. Perfect for critical thinking training before publishing content. |
😈 Devil's Advocate / Bias Breaker
Challenge your thinking before you publish.
🎯 Philosophy
AI kamu tau semua preferensimu. Skill ini mencegahmu terjebak di echo chamber dengan kasih argumen kontra yang logis dan tajam - tapi fair.
💡 How It Works
- You write - Draft, opini, atau ide
- AI analyzes - Identifikasi key claims & assumptions
- Web search - Cari data/evidence yang kontradiktif
- Counter-arguments - Generate perspektif berlawanan
- Telegram reply - Deliver sebagai challenge
📝 Usage
Via Telegram
Kirim draft/opini kamu, lalu mention:
"Ini draft aku tentang kenapa remote work lebih baik. Review dong. @devil"
Atau command:
/devil [paste your draft here]
Hasil (Contoh):
😈 Devil's Advocate Analysis
💭 Your claim: "Remote work selalu lebih produktif"
🔍 Counter-evidence:
• Data terbaru dari Microsoft (2024): Hybrid workers 23% lebih produktif
• Jurnal HBR: Isolasi berkurangnya kolaborasi spontan
• Contoh: Yahoo & IBM balik ke office karena productivity drop
🎯 Logical counter:
"Kalau remote work selalu lebih baik, kenapa banyak tech giants
balik ke hybrid? Apakah kamu sudah pertimbangkan:
1. Contextual collaboration loss?
2. Junior mentorship challenges?
3. Innovation serendipity?"
💡 Alternative perspective:
Mungkin bukan "remote vs office" tapi "how to hybrid effectively?"
---
⚖️ Level: Moderate
🤔 Think about it before you hit publish.
⚙️ Configuration
Edit config.json:
{
"level": "moderate",
"style": "socratic",
"search_enabled": true,
"evidence_required": true,
"tone": "respectful_but_firm"
}
Levels:
- 🟢 Gentle - Soft challenges, "Have you considered..."
- 🟡 Moderate - Direct counter-args with evidence (default)
- 🔴 Aggressive - Hard-hitting, no filter
Styles:
- socratic - Tanya balik (default)
- data_driven - Fokus ke statistik & research
- philosophical - Challenge fundamental assumptions
- pragmatic - Real-world consequences
🛠️ Components
| Component | Description |
|---|
| Claim Extractor | Identifikasi main arguments |
| Evidence Hunter | Search contradictory data |
| Logic Builder | Construct sound counter-arguments |
| Tone Moderator | Adjust based on config level |
| Telegram Deliverer | Reply with formatted analysis |
🎯 Perfect For
- Draft blog post / newsletter
- Tweet/thread yang kontroversial
- Business decision justification
- Personal opinion yang mau dipublish
- Argument preparation
🔒 Privacy
- Local processing (ga disimpan)
- Search queries anonymized
- Draft di-delete setelah analysis
📝 Example Triggers
"Aku mau nulis tentang kenapa crypto itu scam. Thoughts? @devil"
"Draft: "Indonesia harus stop export raw materials"
Ada yang mau challenge sebelum aku publish? @devil"
"/devil Saya pikir AI akan gantiin semua programmer dalam 5 tahun"
⚠️ Disclaimer
This skill is for critical thinking training, not to:
- Change your mind forcefully
- Provide definitive "truth"
- Replace your own judgment
Use it to strengthen your arguments, not weaken your conviction.
🎭 Philosophy
"A strong argument is one that has survived its strongest challenges."
The goal isn't to prove you wrong. It's to make you right for better reasons.
