neologism-builder

name	neologism-builder
description	Use when creating new Elvish words. Provides a structured choice between "functional/practical" neologisms and "poetic/metaphorical" neologisms, guided by precise, diachronic phonological sound laws.

Neologism Builder

This skill helps you construct linguistically authentic Elvish neologisms. When asked to name a new concept:

1. The Two-Path Approach

Always offer the user two distinct stylistic options:

A. The Practical (Functional) Path

• Approach: Deconstruct the concept into its literal functional components.
• Method: Combine existing roots for the components + a standard agentive or instrumental suffix (like Quenya -tar for "maker").
• Result: A word that feels like a tool name (e.g., Yávetar - "Fruit-maker").

B. The Poetic (Metaphorical) Path

• Approach: Map the concept to a metaphor or symbolic meaning.
• Method: Use Tolkien's known naming conventions for high-concept names, looking for roots that imply the outcome or essence of the thing rather than its physical makeup.
• Result: A word that sounds like a title, personification, or mythic object (e.g., Yaváno - "Fruit-bringer").

---

2. Advanced Phonology & Sourcing Rules

To ensure utmost authenticity, apply these advanced structural protocols:

A. The Principle of Acoustic Iconicity (The "Thud-vs-Spring" Rule)

• Rule: Analyze the plosive/nasal weight of consonant clusters in potential roots.
• Application:
  • Heavy/Obstruction Clusters: Clusters like -mp-, -nt-, or -nk- are phonesthemically weighted, denoting thudding, dragging, or physical difficulty (e.g., lampa- "hobble", hampa- "hop").
  • Light/Fluid Clusters: Standard voiced plosives (-b-, -d-, -g-) or liquids (-l-, -r-) represent springiness, ease, or fluidity (e.g., laba- "hop").

B. The Anchorage Protocol

• Rule: Every proposed root must be anchored to attested names or proper nouns.
• Method: Invoke the MCP tool get_root_anchors using the base root's unique page ID. Review character, place, or constellation names (e.g., Sador's nickname Labadal "Hopafoot") to justify the phonetic and grammatical behavior of the proposed root.

C. The Resistance vs. Complexity Matrix

• Rule: Audit the exact nature of the concept's difficulty:
  • External/Physical Resistance: If the difficulty arises from physical stiffness or conditions, use roots derived from √SRAG (clumsy/stiff, e.g., hraia, hranga) or √LAMP (heavy footfall).
  • Internal/Abstract Complexity: If the difficulty lies in the intellectual or procedural complexity of the task, use prefixes/adjectives derived from √GUR (cumbrous, arduous, e.g., urda, ur(u)-).

---

3. Linguistic Construction TL;DRs (from eldamo-linguistics)

To achieve true historical and phonotactic accuracy, apply these strict sound-engineering principles derived from Tolkien's historical grammar:

A. Quenya Phonotactic Constraints

• Word-Final Rule: Quenya never allows arbitrary consonants at the end of words. Word-final consonants are strictly restricted to the group: t, n, r, s, l (mnemonic: TaN-RuSeL).
• Syllable Structure: Quenya prefers open syllables (ending in a vowel) or simple coda structures. Ensure any newly constructed noun or verb respects this.

B. Sindarin Compounding & Sandhi Synthesis

When joining words in Sindarin, you must handle consonant clashes and mutations:

1. Nasal Sandhi: If the first element ends in a nasal -n (e.g., aran "king") and is followed by a consonant like g- (e.g., gorn "revered"), the nasal is dropped: aran + gorn -> ara + gorn.
2. Lenition (Soft Mutation): The second element of a compound must undergo soft mutation (lenition) where phonologically required:
   • p, t, c -> b, d, g
   • b, d, g -> v, dh, Ø (vanishes or becomes a silent shift)
   • m, s -> v, h
   • Result: ara + gorn -> Aragorn.

C. Diachronic sound laws & Vowel Shortening

• Polysyllabic Shortening (p_v_length): Long vowels are shortened in final syllables of polysyllabic words.
  • Example: Primitive *arān -> Sindarin aran (the final -ā- must shorten). Always adjust vowels in final syllables of compound neologisms accordingly.

---

4. Construction Workflow

1. Etymological Root Search & Historical Pathing:
   • Use eldamo-remote_enquire_lexicon to find core primitive roots (e.g., √YAB for "fruit", √KEM for "earth").
   • Reconstruct step-by-step: Root (e.g., √PAR) -> Primitive (e.g., *parmā) -> Quenya/Sindarin Child (e.g., parma/parf).
2. Word-Family Expansion:
   • Do not stop at a single noun. Proactively expand the neologism into its relevant word-family:
     • Noun: (The thing/agent, e.g., Yaváno)
     • Verb: (The action, e.g., Yavanta-)
     • Adjective: (The quality, e.g., Yavanya)
3. Linguistic Verification:
   • Verify the Quenya final consonant filter, Sindarin mutations/sandhi, and final syllable vowel lengths.
4. The "Voice Test":
   • If available, generate a pronunciation using render_elvish_audio to see if it carries the right "weight" or tone for the concept.

---

5. Quick-Reference Suffix Guide

Use these highly attested, structurally sound suffixes to form the final neologisms:

Language	Suffix	Function	Meaning / Example
Quenya	-ma	Instrumental	Tool/Device (e.g., parma "book")
Quenya	-tar / -tur	High Agent	Ruler/Master/Lord (e.g., Valatar "King-ruler")
Quenya	-no / -në	Simple Agent	Person/Bringer (e.g., yaváno "fruit-bringer")
Sindarin	-weg / -deg	Instrumental	Tool/Device (e.g., gaunweg "trap-maker")
Sindarin	-or / -ron	Masculine Agent	Person/Doer (e.g., ortheron "conqueror")
Sindarin	-ril	Feminine Agent	Person/Doer (e.g., gloril "golden lady")

---

6. Concept Validity Tiers

Always classify your suggestions so the user understands their historical pedigree:

• Tier 1 (Late Conception - Preferred): Based on J.R.R. Tolkien's 1950s-1960s writings (The Lord of the Rings and later papers).
• Tier 2 (Middle Conception): Based on the 1930s writings (The Etymologies). Highly reliable and widely accepted in Neo-Elvish.
• Tier 3 (Early Conception): Based on the 1910s-1920s writings (The Book of Lost Tales, Gnomish, Early Qenya). Use only as a fallback and mark with ⚠️ (Early Concept).

---

7. Documentation

Always record your construction logic (e.g., "I used the root X for Y, applied the sound shift Z, and added the suffix W for agentivity") so the user understands the linguistic pedigree of their new word.

---

8. Quantitative Evaluation (The 100-Point Scoring Matrix)

To maintain a perfect balance between rigid phonological science and poetic, aesthetic license, every proposed neologism must undergo a quantitative evaluation out of 100 points. This prevents over-systematization and celebrates artistic expression within the linguistic framework.

A. Phonotactic Rigor (30 Points — The "Hard Gate")

• What it measures: Uncompromising adherence to the target language's structural and phonetic rules (e.g., Quenya's final consonant TaN-RuSeL restriction, Sindarin soft mutations, vowel shortening in final polysyllabic codas).
• Scoring:
  • 30 points: Structurally and phonologically flawless.
  • 0 points: Phonologically invalid. Disqualified. (Poetic license cannot violate raw phonetic law).

B. Morphological & Acoustic Resonance (25 Points)

• What it measures: How naturally the word fits into the language's established vocabulary paradigms and verbal/adjectival families. Highlights phonetic iconicity (where the sound matches the sense, e.g., using the heavy nasal -mp- of √LAMP to convey a thudding hobbling gait).
• Scoring:
  • 20-25 points: Matches surrounding vocabulary style and exhibits beautiful phonetic iconicity.
  • 10-19 points: Fits well structurally but lacks poetic or iconic resonance.
  • 0-9 points: Awkward compound or unusual fit.

C. Historical Pedigree (25 Points)

• What it measures: The chronological era and manuscript authority of the source root.
• Scoring:
  • 25 points: Tier 1 (Late Conception, 1950s-1970s).
  • 15 points: Tier 2 (Middle Conception, 1930s The Etymologies).
  • 5 points: Tier 3 (Early Conception, 1910s-1920s).

D. Anchorage Bonus (20 Points)

• What it measures: Direct or recursive proper-noun/place-name descendants via the get_root_anchors tool (e.g., Sador's nickname Labadal anchoring the root √LOP -> laba-).
• Scoring:
  • +20 points: Root possesses one or more direct/recursive proper noun or place-name anchors.
  • 0 points: No attested proper noun anchor exists. This is NOT a disqualifier. Poetic, structurally flawless words can still score a magnificent 80/100 (An Elite Grade).

---

E. Grade Index

• 90 - 100 (S): Masterpiece of Elvish engineering; extremely authentic, phonetically evocative, and historically anchored.
• 80 - 89 (A): Elite Neologism; highly authentic, beautiful, and structural, though it may lack a direct historical proper-noun anchor.
• 60 - 79 (B): Standard Neo-Elvish; fully usable but relies on earlier/Middle conceptions or slightly awkward compounding.
• Below 60 (C/F): Substandard; not recommended for active use.