Menú
Perform an AWS Well-Architected Framework review of the current workload IaC and architecture, generating findings and GitHub issues for improvements.
Basado en la clasificación ocupacional SOC
Expert on the history, origin, and correct use of the em dash. Use when writing or reviewing code, comments, or data files to avoid em and en dashes, defaulting to never using them and replacing any found with a hyphen (-). Includes strong knowledge of punctuation marks and the proper usage of punctuation characters when writing comments.
Use when an outage, production incident, or significant service degradation has occurred and the team needs to write a structured blameless post-mortem. Triggers on phrases like "write a post-mortem", "incident review", "what went wrong", "outage report", "root cause analysis", or "RCA". Covers timeline reconstruction, contributing factor analysis, impact quantification, and action item generation with owners.
Create, set up, or update the personal context portfolio: structured markdown files describing who you are, how you work, your teams, and your tool/ADO configuration. Runs the interview workflow for first-time setup and targeted edits for updates. Trigger this skill when the user asks to: set up their context, create or update their context portfolio, "create my IQ", "set up my IQ", edit their profile, add/remove a stakeholder, update ADO config, change team info, update pillars, or set up any plugin configuration. Trigger when another skill fails to find context (missing files or TODO markers) and needs context populated. Also trigger when the user mentions a context change in passing (e.g., "my manager changed", "we added someone to the team") to offer a context file update. Do NOT trigger for read-only questions like "who's on my team?" or "what's my ADO config?". Those are answered directly from the context files referenced in the loaded custom instructions; no skill is needed.
Adopt repository-level harness engineering for coding agents. Use when a user wants to prevent repeated AI coding-agent mistakes by turning failures into durable instructions, drift checks, regression tests, failure memory, and adoption reports tailored to the target repository.
Security hardening reviewer for GitHub Actions workflow files (.github/workflows/*.yml). Reasons about the Actions threat model that pattern matchers and general code linters miss — untrusted-input script injection, privileged triggers running fork code, mutable action references, and over-scoped tokens. Use this skill when asked to review, audit, harden, or secure a GitHub Actions workflow, when writing a new workflow, or for any request like "is this workflow safe?", "review my CI for security issues", "why is pull_request_target dangerous here?", "pin my actions", or "lock down GITHUB_TOKEN permissions". Covers script injection via ${{ }} interpolation, pull_request_target / workflow_run privilege escalation, SHA-pinning of third-party actions, least-privilege permissions, GITHUB_ENV/GITHUB_OUTPUT injection, secret exposure, OIDC over long-lived credentials, and self-hosted runner exposure on public repositories.
Build GitHub Copilot workflows with Xquik X API SDKs, REST endpoints, MCP tools, signed webhooks, tweet search, user lookup, follower exports, media actions, and agent automation.
| name | aws-well-architected-review |
| description | Perform an AWS Well-Architected Framework review of the current workload IaC and architecture, generating findings and GitHub issues for improvements. |
This workflow performs a structured AWS Well-Architected Framework (WAF) review against your workload's IaC files and deployed infrastructure. It identifies risks across all 6 WAF pillars and creates GitHub issues to track remediation.
Fetch current AWS WAF best practices:
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/wellarchitected/latest/framework/welcome.htmlScan the repository for IaC files:
**/*.tf**/*.yaml, **/*.json (CFn templates)lib/**/*.ts, bin/**/*.ts, cdk.jsonIdentify key AWS services in use (compute, data, networking, security, observability) and generate a Mermaid architecture diagram.
* actions without justification)enforceSSL: true)aws guardduty list-detectors)arm64, EC2 Graviton)arm64 architecture adopted (20% cost reduction)For each finding, classify:
🏗️ AWS Well-Architected Review Summary
📊 Review Results:
• IaC Files Analyzed: X
• AWS Services Identified: Y
• Total Findings: Z
• High Risk: A (immediate action required)
• Medium Risk: B (should address soon)
• Low Risk: C (nice to have)
🔴 Top High Risk Findings:
1. [Pillar]: [Finding] — [Why it matters]
2. [Pillar]: [Finding] — [Why it matters]
💡 This will create Z individual GitHub issues + 1 EPIC issue.
❓ Proceed with creating GitHub issues? (y/n)
Label with "well-architected" and the pillar name (e.g., "security", "reliability").
Title: [WAF-<PILLAR>] [Brief Finding] — [Risk Level]
Body:
## 🏗️ Well-Architected Finding: [Brief Title]
**Pillar**: [Name] | **Risk Level**: [High/Medium/Low] | **Effort**: [Low/Medium/High]
### 📋 Description
[Clear explanation of the finding and why it matters]
### 🔧 Remediation
**IaC Fix** (preferred):
```hcl
# Terraform example
resource "aws_s3_bucket_server_side_encryption_configuration" "example" {
bucket = aws_s3_bucket.example.id
rule {
apply_server_side_encryption_by_default {
sse_algorithm = "aws:kms"
}
}
}
AWS CLI fallback:
aws s3api put-bucket-encryption --bucket <name> \
--server-side-encryption-configuration '{"Rules":[{"ApplyServerSideEncryptionByDefault":{"SSEAlgorithm":"aws:kms"}}]}'
Well-Architected Question: [WAF question this maps to]
### Step 7: Create EPIC Tracking Issue
Label with "well-architected" and "epic".
**Title**: `[EPIC] AWS Well-Architected Review — X findings across 6 pillars`
**Body**: Executive summary with pillar breakdown table (finding counts by pillar and risk level), Mermaid architecture diagram, prioritized checklist linking all individual issues (High → Medium → Low), and success criteria:
- All High-risk findings resolved
- Medium findings have accepted mitigation plans
- No regression in existing CloudWatch alarms or Config rules
## Error Handling
- **No IaC Files Found**: Limit review to live resource discovery via AWS CLI and note the gap
- **Insufficient AWS Permissions**: List required read-only permissions for the review
- **GitHub Creation Failure**: Output all findings as formatted markdown to console
## Success Criteria
- ✅ All 6 WAF pillars reviewed against IaC and live infrastructure
- ✅ All findings classified by risk level and pillar
- ✅ Actionable remediation steps with IaC examples for each finding
- ✅ GitHub issues created for team tracking
- ✅ Architecture diagram generated for EPIC context
- ✅ AWS documentation references included