Menú
Plan a new task/project using structured decomposition before any implementation
Instalar con Codex o Claude Copia este prompt, pégalo en Codex, Claude u otro asistente, y deja que revise la página de la skill y la instale por ti.
Basado en la clasificación ocupacional SOC
Generate a wide field of ideas, then pressure-test them. Five generators diverge, two challengers prune the weak ones, three synthesizers rank what survives.
Three-agent adversarial bug finder. Hunter overclaims every issue it can find, Skeptic disproves what it can, Referee arbitrates what survives. Scoring incentives force each role to behave honestly.
Dialectic process for reviewing, brainstorming, comparing tradeoffs, or stress-testing plans. Configurable modes, agent counts, and expert lenses.
Execute a pre-defined plan using implementation agents (no design changes)
Capture structured learnings (gotcha, pattern, decision, bug-fix) as JSONL per project. Cross-project searchable.
Assume the plan failed — then explain why. Three pessimists write failure narratives, two optimists rebut, a risk assessor weighs which failure modes are real.
| name | plan-task |
| description | Plan a new task/project using structured decomposition before any implementation |
| user-invocable | true |
| disable-model-invocation | false |
| argument-hint | <task description> |
Structured planning mode. NO implementation until the plan is approved.
The task to plan is: $ARGUMENTS
If no arguments provided, ask the user what they want to plan.
If the task is genuinely trivial (< 2 minutes of work), say so and ask if the user wants to skip planning.
State the objective in one clear sentence. If ambiguous, ask the user to clarify before proceeding.
List concrete success criteria. Use specific, measurable outcomes where possible.
If the user hasn't provided success criteria, propose some and ask for confirmation.
If the task involves unfamiliar territory, launch an Explore agent to gather context:
Break the task into sub-tasks. Read @decomposition-guide.md for the sub-task template and table format.
Read @risk-checklist.md for the risk identification framework.
Read @polishing-guide.md for the iterative refinement process, dialectic checkpoint, and multi-model synthesis option.
Summarize the full plan in a clear format:
Ask the user: "Does this plan look right? Adjust anything before I start?"
Read @rules.md for planning rules and gotchas.