review-code

name	review-code
description	Review code quality, logic, slop, oversized files, and simplification opportunities. Use after implementation before tests/final response.

Review Code

Required review checklist

• Logical coherence
• Unnecessary complexity
• Duplicated code
• Files/functions growing too large
• Wrong abstraction level
• Reusable components/services ignored
• Type, error handling, security, and accessibility risks

Required output template

## Required fixes
- `<path>` — <fix and reason>

## Simplifications worth doing now
- `<path>` — <safe simplification>

## Deferred improvements
- <optional future work, not required now>

## Slop signals checked
- Oversized files: yes/no + details
- Duplication: yes/no + details
- Avoidable abstraction: yes/no + details

## Confidence
- low / medium / high