Use when writing academic theses or dissertations (Master's, PhD, undergraduate honors). Covers chapter-by-chapter structure, literature review chapters, methodology, results, discussion, conclusion, front matter, and thesis-specific conventions including abstract, acknowledgements, appendices, and institutional formatting requirements.
Instrucciones de origen · Vista previa de solo lectura
name
thesis-writing
description
Use when writing academic theses or dissertations (Master's, PhD, undergraduate honors). Covers chapter-by-chapter structure, literature review chapters, methodology, results, discussion, conclusion, front matter, and thesis-specific conventions including abstract, acknowledgements, appendices, and institutional formatting requirements.
allowed-tools
["Read","Write","Edit","Bash"]
Thesis Writing
Overview
This skill guides the writing of academic theses and dissertations—Master's (MSc/MA), doctoral (PhD/DPhil), and undergraduate honors—combining rigorous structure with depth of argumentation appropriate for degree-level assessment.
Core principle: A thesis is an extended argument. Every chapter, section, and paragraph must advance the central thesis statement. Use a two-stage process: first build section outlines informed by Zotero literature search, then convert to flowing scholarly prose.
Critical: Write in full paragraphs with flowing academic prose. Never submit bullet points in the final document. Use claude-scientific-writer:zotero-research-lookup for all literature-based evidence gathering—it uses the advanced_rag semantic search mode for high-quality chunk-level retrieval from your Zotero library.
Thesis vs. Journal Paper: Key Differences
Dimension
Journal Paper
Thesis/Dissertation
Length
4,000–10,000 words
20,000–100,000+ words
Audience
Field specialists
Examining committee + future researchers
Literature review
Focused, selective
Comprehensive, critically synthesized
Methods
Summarized
Fully reproducible detail
Original contribution
One contribution
Multiple or one substantial contribution
Voice
Impersonal
Often first-person acceptable
Chapter structure
IMRAD
Extended multi-chapter format
Standard Thesis Chapter Structure
Front Matter
Title page — title, author, institution, degree, date
Abstract — 200–500 words (standalone summary; state gap, approach, findings, contribution)
Acknowledgements — brief personal and funding acknowledgements
Table of contents, list of figures, list of tables, list of abbreviations
Declaration / statement of originality
Core Chapters
Chapter 1 — Introduction
Research context and significance
Problem statement and research gap (use zotero-research-lookup to document gap)
Research questions or hypotheses (numbered, specific)
Organize by research question, not by data collection order
Tables and figures with full captions (self-explanatory)
No interpretation here (save for Discussion)
Chapter 5 — Discussion
Interpret findings in light of research questions
Compare with existing literature (use zotero-research-lookup to find relevant papers)
Theoretical and practical implications
Limitations and their impact
Unexpected findings
Chapter 6 — Conclusion
Restate contribution(s) to knowledge
Answer each research question directly
Recommendations for practice and future research
Final reflective statement on significance
Back Matter
References / Bibliography (use institutional or field-standard style)
Appendices (instruments, raw data summaries, ethics approval, supplementary analyses)
Chapter 2 In-Depth: Literature Review
The literature review chapter is the most research-intensive part of the thesis. It demonstrates mastery of the field and justifies the research gap.
Structure Options
Thematic structure (most common): Group literature by theme, concept, or theoretical strand—not chronologically.
Funnel structure: Move from broad field → sub-field → specific gap → your study.
Conceptual framework section: End the chapter with a conceptual or theoretical framework diagram (text-based description) that organizes the key constructs your study will examine.
Two-Stage Writing Process for Literature Review
Stage 1 — Build evidence outline using zotero-research-lookup:
For each thematic section:
Invoke claude-scientific-writer:zotero-research-lookup with a targeted semantic query
The skill uses advanced_rag mode: it retrieves chunk-level matches with reranking, returning matched text passages alongside metadata—ideal for extracting specific claims from PDFs
Cite primary sources; avoid secondary citations where primary is accessible
In literature review, cite multiple studies per claim to show breadth
Paragraph Architecture
Each paragraph should follow:
Topic sentence — states the paragraph's argument
Evidence — 2–4 cited pieces of support
Analysis — your interpretation connecting evidence to the argument
Transition — links to the next paragraph or signals conclusion
Transitions Between Chapters
Every chapter should end with a brief chapter summary (3–5 sentences) and a transition sentence pointing to the next chapter's purpose.
Citation Styles by Discipline
Discipline
Style
Sciences (biology, chemistry, physics)
Vancouver or APA 7
Social sciences, psychology, education
APA 7
Humanities (history, literature)
Chicago Notes-Bibliography
Engineering, computer science
IEEE
Law
Jurisdiction-specific (Bluebook, OSCOLA)
Business, economics
Harvard / APA
Always verify the exact style required by your institution and department.
Common Thesis Writing Mistakes
Mistake
Fix
Literature review as annotated bibliography
Synthesize across sources; organize thematically
Methodology without philosophical grounding
State research paradigm before design choices
Results mixed with interpretation
Keep results objective; interpretation belongs in Discussion
Weak conclusion that just summarizes
State explicit contribution to knowledge; answer each RQ
Inconsistent tense
Methods/results: past tense; established facts: present tense
Single-source paragraphs
Integrate 2–4 sources per paragraph in lit review
Thesis statement buried or absent
State research gap + approach + contribution in Introduction clearly
Ignoring counter-evidence
Engage with contradictory findings; show critical thinking
Workflow: Writing a Thesis Chapter
1. PLAN
- Identify chapter purpose and its argument
- List research questions this chapter addresses
2. SEARCH (for each thematic section)
- Invoke zotero-research-lookup with targeted query
- If results are empty or irrelevant → fall back to semantic-scholar-lookup
- Collect evidence scaffold as bullet points
3. OUTLINE
- Arrange bullet points into logical paragraph groups
- Identify gaps → run additional searches
4. DRAFT
- Convert each bullet group to a full paragraph (topic + evidence + analysis + transition)
- Write in full prose; no bullet points in final output
5. REVIEW
- Does each paragraph advance the chapter argument?
- Are citations integrated (not listed)?
- Is tense consistent?
- Does the chapter end with a summary and transition?
Integration with Other Skills
claude-scientific-writer:zotero-research-lookup — REQUIRED for all literature-based sections; use advanced_rag for chunk-level precision
claude-scientific-writer:semantic-scholar-lookup — fallback when Zotero returns empty or insufficient results; searches the open Semantic Scholar corpus
claude-scientific-writer:zotero-deep-research — use for iterative multi-round research on complex topics requiring gap analysis
claude-scientific-writer:literature-review — complements Chapter 2 with systematic search protocols and PRISMA-style documentation
claude-scientific-writer:venue-templates — for formatting theses to institutional LaTeX templates
claude-scientific-writer:citation-management — for verifying and generating accurate BibTeX entries
Do not use image generation skills (scientific-schematics, generate-image) unless the thesis specifically requires custom diagrams—most theses use data-generated figures produced by the researcher's own analysis tools.
