| name | multi-agent-parallel-build |
| description | Orchestrate multiple coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, etc.) in parallel waves to build UI pages, API endpoints, or features simultaneously. Use when building dashboards with 5+ pages, microservices, or any project where independent components can be built concurrently. Covers wave planning, shared shell/component libraries, agent spawning, merge conflict avoidance, and post-wave integration fixes. |
Multi-Agent Parallel Build
Spawn multiple coding agents in parallel to build independent components simultaneously. Reduces wall-clock time 3-5x for multi-page builds.
When to Use
- Building 4+ UI pages that share a shell but have independent content
- Creating multiple API endpoint groups
- Any project with clearly separable, independent work units
Wave Architecture
Wave 0 (Sequential — YOU do this):
→ Shared infrastructure: API, shell components, CSS, data layer
Wave 1 (Parallel — AGENTS do this):
→ Agent A: Page/Feature 1
→ Agent B: Page/Feature 2
→ Agent C: Page/Feature 3
→ Agent D: Page/Feature 4
→ Agent E: Page/Feature 5
Wave 2 (Sequential — YOU do this):
→ Integration fixes, cross-component wiring, testing
Step 1: Wave 0 — Build Shared Infrastructure
Before spawning agents, create everything they'll all need:
- API layer with all endpoints agents will consume
- Shared shell (nav, header, theme, CSS variables)
- Component library (cards, charts, tables, modals)
- Data contracts (JSON shapes agents should expect from API)
This is critical — agents that build against a shared shell produce consistent UIs. Agents that each invent their own shell produce chaos.
Example shared shell:
function createShell(pageTitle, navItems) { }
function createCard(title, content) { }
function mcFetch(endpoint) { }
Step 2: Plan Agent Assignments
Each agent gets:
- One clear deliverable (a page, a feature, a service)
- Path to shared resources (shell.js, shell.css, API base URL)
- API contract (which endpoints to call, expected response shapes)
- No overlapping files — each agent writes to its own directory/files
Write a task prompt for each agent:
Build {page_name} at {file_path}.
Import shared shell from {shell_path}.
Fetch data from these API endpoints: {endpoints}.
Expected data shapes: {json_examples}.
Use Chart.js/D3 for visualization. Dark theme. No frameworks — vanilla JS + HTML.
Step 3: Spawn Agents
Use sessions_spawn or coding-agent skill to launch all agents simultaneously:
Agent A: "Build agents.html — display 215 AI agents in searchable grid..."
Agent B: "Build skills.html — display 197 skills with category filters..."
Agent C: "Build knowledge.html — display 6.8K knowledge records with search..."
Agent D: "Build tools.html — display 231 tools grouped by MCP server..."
Agent E: "Build workflows.html + archetypes.html — two pages..."
Key flags:
- Each agent gets its own working directory or clearly separate files
- Include the shared shell path and API contract in every prompt
- Set reasonable timeouts (10-20 min per page)
Step 4: Wave 2 — Integration Fixes
Common issues after parallel build:
Double-prefix bug
Agents often misconstruct API URLs: /api/mc/api/mc/ instead of /api/mc/. Fix with sed:
sed -i '' "s|/api/mc/api/mc/|/api/mc/|g" static/mc/*.html
Inconsistent mcFetch usage
Some agents inline fetch() instead of using the shared mcFetch(). Standardize.
Missing StaticFiles mount
Server needs routes for the new static directories:
app.mount("/static/mc", StaticFiles(directory="static/mc"), name="mc-static")
Large payload timeouts
If tables have massive text columns (system_prompt, etc.), agents may have built queries that select everything. Fix API to use lightweight selects.
Principles
- Wave 0 quality determines Wave 1 success — spend 60% of effort on shared infrastructure
- No file overlap between agents — if two agents touch the same file, one will clobber the other
- API-first — build and test all API endpoints before spawning UI agents
- Expect 2-3 integration bugs per agent — budget 20 min for Wave 2 fixes
- 5 agents is the sweet spot — more than 7 creates coordination overhead that exceeds time savings