arrow-maintenance

name	arrow-maintenance
description	Manage the arrow of intent tracking system for complex projects. Use when working with docs/arrows/ directory, auditing spec-to-code coherence, mapping new system areas, or maintaining the arrow dependency graph. Compatible overlay on top of linked-intent-dev — adds navigation and tracking for projects too large to hold in one context window.

Arrow Maintenance

The arrow system tracks design-to-code coherence across a complex project. It's a scaling layer on top of the linked-intent-dev workflow — when a project has too many LLDs and spec files to navigate from memory, arrows provide the map.

Core Concepts

Arrow of intent: The chain HLD → LLDs → EARS → Tests → Code. Each arrow represents one domain or subsystem with its own chain.

Arrow doc (docs/arrows/{name}.md): Tracks one arrow's references, implementation status, findings, and remaining work.

Index (docs/arrows/index.yaml): The dependency graph. Load this first to understand what's available, what's blocked, and what needs work.

Starting a Session

1. Read docs/arrows/index.yaml
2. Find arrows with no blockers: check blockedBy: []
3. Read the arrow doc for your target domain
4. Follow its references to LLDs, spec files, and code

Arrow Statuses

Status	Meaning
UNMAPPED	Not yet explored
MAPPED	Structure known, specs not verified against code
AUDITED	Specs verified — implementation status understood
OK	Fully coherent — all specs implemented
PARTIAL	Some specs missing or partial
BROKEN	Code and docs have diverged significantly
STALE	Docs exist but outdated
OBSOLETE	Superseded, kept for historical reference
MERGED	Combined into another arrow (use merged_into field)

Normal progression: UNMAPPED → MAPPED → AUDITED → OK

Workflows

Auditing an Arrow

1. Read arrow doc references (LLD, spec file, code locations)
2. For each EARS spec, grep codebase for implementing code
3. Verify behavior matches spec intent
4. Record in arrow doc: implemented / partial / missing per spec category
5. Update index.yaml: status, audited date, next action, drift

Mapping a New Arrow

1. Explore code and docs for the domain (take a "core sample")
2. Add entry to arrows section in index.yaml
3. Create docs/arrows/{name}.md — see arrow-doc-template.md
4. Remove from unmapped section if listed there

Fixing an Arrow

When specs and code disagree, determine which is wrong:

• Code is wrong: Write failing tests first, then fix code to match specs
• Specs are wrong: Update specs, cascade changes (follow design-driven-dev)
• Both: Fix specs first, then code

After fixing, update arrow doc and index.yaml status.

Retiring an Arrow

1. Set status to OBSOLETE in index.yaml
2. Clear blockedBy/blocks relationships
3. Set next and drift to null
4. Update arrow doc with what superseded it

Splitting / Merging

Split (one → two): Create new arrow, move relevant specs, cross-reference both arrow docs.

Merge (two → one): Consolidate into primary, set secondary to status: MERGED with merged_into: primary-name.

Index.yaml Schema

schema_version: 1
last_updated: YYYY-MM-DD

arrows:
  domain-name:
    status: AUDITED
    sampled: YYYY-MM-DD
    audited: YYYY-MM-DD
    blocks: []
    blockedBy: []
    detail: domain-name.md
    next: "next action needed"
    drift: "spec-code divergence description, or null"

unmapped:
  # Items not yet explored

EARS Spec Status Markers

Arrow maintenance reads and summarizes spec statuses from docs/specs/ files. The markers (defined in design-driven-dev) are:

• [x] — implemented
• [ ] — active gap
• [D] — deferred (correct intent, not needed yet)

Specs that are no longer wanted should be deleted. Git preserves history.

Summarize in arrow docs: "15 of 20 active specs implemented; 5 deferred"

Relationship to design-driven-dev

The design-driven-dev skill defines the core workflow: HLD → LLD → EARS → Tests → Code. Arrow maintenance adds:

• Navigation: index.yaml tells agents where to start
• Tracking: Arrow docs record what's implemented vs. missing
• Dependencies: blockedBy/blocks relationships prevent wasted work

Use design-driven-dev for individual changes. Use arrow-maintenance for system-wide coherence.