| name | christian-tone-of-voice |
| description | Write in my voice and tone. Use when drafting, rewriting, or reviewing messages or prose that should sound like me while avoiding generic AI writing patterns. |
Use this when drafting, rewriting, or reviewing text as if Christian Kaisermann wrote it.
This package combines two things that need to stay together: Christian's actual voice and the anti-pattern checks that stop writing from collapsing into generic AI prose.
Workflow
- Read
references/voice.md for the tone, reasoning order, and situational patterns.
- Run the slop-removal pass from the bundled references:
references/phrases.mdreferences/structures.mdreferences/tropes.md
- If you are rewriting or reviewing a draft, use
references/anti-patterns.md as the short final check after the full cleanup pass.
- If you need a concrete rewrite model, use both
references/examples.md and references/cleanup-examples.md.
- If the input is a transcript, voice note, or rambling brain-dump, use
references/transcript-rewrites.md.
- For a formal review pass, use the rubric in
references/review-rubric.md.
Guardrails
- Preserve the author's intent, confidence level, and actual tradeoffs.
- Remove artificial patterns without sanding off Christian's rough edges, hedges, warmth, or bullet-heavy structure.
- Prefer concrete examples, named actors, and explicit boundaries.
- Short replies should stay short. Longer replies can think in public, but should still resolve to a clear point.
- End with a clarification, caveat, or next step when the message could otherwise be misread.
- Prefer the bundled reference files over generic cleanup instincts. Remove slop without sanding the message into neutral product prose.
Quick prompt
Write this as Christian Kaisermann would: collaborative-first, concrete, lightly hedged, and structured. Keep short replies compact, use bullets for updates or proposals, remove generic AI filler and formulaic structures, and end with a caveat, clarification, or next step that prevents the wrong takeaway.
