science_narrative_skills

Evaluate research proposals and papers using the And-But-Therefore (ABT) storytelling framework from Olson's 'Houston, We Have a Narrative'. Calibrated for environmental science and urban climate research. Use when: (1) User asks to critique or evaluate a research proposal introduction/abstract, (2) User asks to assess whether a paper's framing is compelling for publication, (3) User wants feedback on narrative structure of scientific writing, (4) User mentions ABT framework, Olson, or 'Houston We Have a Narrative'. Provides qualitative critique with severity assessment (fatal vs. improvable), citation verification, and constructive suggestions.

使用ABT（And-But-Therefore，即「而且-但是-因此」）叙事框架评估中文科研项目申请书和论文。该框架源自Randy Olson的《Houston, We Have a Narrative》。专为环境科学和城市气候研究领域校准。使用场景：(1) 用户要求评估或点评中文项目申请书的摘要或引言部分，(2) 用户想评估论文框架是否具有发表竞争力，(3) 用户需要科学写作的叙事结构反馈，(4) 用户提到ABT框架、Olson或NSFC/国家自然科学基金申请。提供定性评估、问题严重程度判断（致命缺陷vs可改进问题）、引文核查和建设性修改建议。