laplace-skills

Use when the user asks for a deep code review, adversarial review, multi-agent review, risk-ranked review, PR review, security-sensitive review, or implementation verification with concrete file and line evidence.

Use when the user asks to debug a failing test, runtime error, regression, flaky behavior, production-like failure, root-cause analysis, or loop-until-done repair workflow.

Use when the user asks for source-backed research, official-documentation lookup, technical comparison, dependency evaluation, repository investigation plus synthesis, or fan-out research with ranked conclusions.

Use when the user asks for a dynamic workflow, multi-agent workflow, task-specific harness, complex task orchestration, fan-out synthesis, adversarial verification, generate-and-filter exploration, tournament-style solution search, or loop-until-done execution in Codex.

Wireframe workflow for low-fidelity structure, hierarchy, and information layout exploration.

Animation workflow for motion-heavy artifacts, scene timing, and browser playback review.

Canva-oriented handoff workflow for asset packaging, layout notes, and transfer readiness.

Core workflow for Claude Design parity across intake, build, preview, verification, and handoff.

HTML deck workflow with stage scaling, presentation structure, and export alignment.

Design-system workflow for tokens, reusable patterns, and consistency decisions.

Developer handoff workflow for implementation notes, assets, and behavior contracts.

Print-oriented PDF export workflow for review packets and handoff bundles.

Editable PPTX export workflow for handoff-ready presentation artifacts.

Screenshot-based PPTX export workflow for visual fidelity handoff.

Standalone HTML bundling workflow for offline delivery and shareable artifact packaging.

Frontend direction workflow for translating references into a concrete design lane.

HTML artifact generation workflow for modular design outputs and reusable starter scaffolds.

Structured intake workflow for goals, references, assets, constraints, and variation scope.

PDF reading workflow for extracting layout, style, and review context into local design state.

Interactive prototype workflow for UI concepts, states, and browser-first review loops.

Directed refinement workflow for focused visual or behavioral adjustments after review.

Commit message editing and commit-plan writing for GitHub repositories. Use when Codex needs to write or improve commit messages, apply Conventional Commits, prepare squash commit summaries, group changes into logical commits, or tighten noisy git history.

CONTRIBUTING.md writing and contribution-process design for GitHub repositories. Use when Codex needs to create or improve contribution guidelines, local setup instructions, branching expectations, testing expectations, documentation rules, or contribution etiquette for a repo.

Issue writing and issue-template authoring for GitHub repositories. Use when Codex needs to write bug reports, feature requests, issue titles, issue forms, reproduction steps, environment sections, or repository issue-triage wording.

Open-source license selection and license-file writing for GitHub repositories. Use when Codex needs to recommend a software license, explain MIT vs Apache-2.0 vs GPL style tradeoffs, or generate an exact LICENSE file without modifying the official text improperly.

Pull request writing for GitHub repositories. Use when Codex needs to draft or normalize a PR title or body, explain why a change exists, summarize implementation scope, document testing, describe user impact, or prepare review-ready pull request text.

README writing and polishing for GitHub repositories. Use when Codex needs to create or rewrite a README, add badges, add multilingual navigation, improve project positioning, add installation and usage sections, or make a repo homepage feel more polished and open-source-ready. Default README language support should include Simplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese, and English unless the user asks for a different language set.

GitHub repository standards review and governance scaffolding. Use when Codex needs to audit a repo for missing GitHub-facing files, recommend `.github` templates, improve repository hygiene, or make a repo look more complete and maintainable to users and contributors.

GitHub workflow router and repository-writing guide. Use when Codex needs to decide whether a task is best handled as README writing, pull request drafting, issue authoring, commit message editing, repository standards review, license selection, or CONTRIBUTING guidance.

Use when users need offline feasibility-study drafting, review, scheme-building, or outline-selection workflows from a recovered prompt corpus, especially when they want reusable system, task, review, expert, and outline prompts without depending on the original app.

将模糊想法转成问题定义、用户场景、研究假设和证据计划

按公司 PRD 模板与示例写法输出结构完整、工程可执行的需求文档

对实验结果、功能试运行和评审意见进行证据化判断与改进建议输出

用清晰的价值、成本、风险和依赖关系对需求项做优先级排序与版本编排

将会议纪要、评审讨论和零散决定整理成结构化决策与行动项

对产品指标、异常变化和分层表现进行分析并输出面向决策的结论

围绕需求上线前后表现输出结构化复盘与改进动作

统一管理本技能库可复用的模板、rubric、检查表和辅助输出规范

Translate a named brand or product's visual language into reusable UI guidance, implementation direction, and design constraints for web or app interfaces. Use when the user asks to make something look like a specific brand, wants brand-inspired UI style transfer, requests design-system guidance from curated references, compares brands such as Apple, Linear, Vercel, Notion, Stripe, Airbnb, Tesla, Framer, or similar entries in this skill's reference index, or needs a fallback shortlist of brands by visual mood.