| name | support-toolkit |
| description | Complete customer support tools toolkit — Intercom, Zendesk, Front, Help Scout deep-dive configuration, AI agent setup, knowledge base optimization, and support analytics. Use when selecting, setting up, or optimizing a customer support platform. Triggers on: "support toolkit", "Intercom deep setup", "Zendesk configuration", "support platform comparison". |
| license | MIT |
| compatibility | Claude Code, Jesse, Codex, Hermes, Windsurf, OpenCode, Gemini CLI, Copilot, Zed, VS Code, Goose |
| metadata | {"version":"1.1.0","author":"LeadMagic","category":"tools","tags":["support","intercom","zendesk","front","help-scout","customer-service","chatbots"],"related_skills":["support-tool-stack","headless-support","sla-management","cs-analytics-dashboards","cs-playbooks","gtm-spend-management"],"frameworks":["Intercom — Conversational support, Fin AI, Product Tours","Zendesk — Omnichannel CX, AI Agents, Explore analytics","Front — Collaborative inbox, rule-based routing","Help Scout — Docs-first support, Beacon widget"]} |
Support Toolkit
Overview
Support tools define how customers experience your company when things go
wrong — and when they need help getting things right. The mistake: buying
the tool your last company used instead of the tool that matches your stage,
team, and support philosophy. This skill covers deep configuration across
the support stack.
Authoritative Foundations
- Intercom — Conversational support, Fin AI, Product Tours — Conversational support, Fin AI, Product Tours
- Zendesk — Omnichannel CX, AI Agents, Explore analytics — Omnichannel CX, AI Agents, Explore analytics
- Front — Collaborative inbox, rule-based routing — Collaborative inbox, rule-based routing
- Help Scout — Docs-first support, Beacon widget — Docs-first support, Beacon widget
When to Use
Trigger phrases: "support platform setup", "Intercom configuration",
"Zendesk deep setup", "support tool comparison", "AI support agent setup"
Platform selection: references/platform-comparison.md · SLAs: templates/sla-matrix.md
Platform Deep Configuration
Intercom — Best for Product-Led SaaS
Setup checklist:
1. Fin AI agent: train on 30+ help center articles → test 50 real questions
2. Messenger: contextual article suggestions before "talk to human"
3. Macros: 15+ for top ticket types (reset password, billing question, etc.)
4. Product Tours: onboarding flow (guided setup → first value)
5. Series: 3 automated email sequences (onboarding, engagement, expansion)
6. Reports: CSAT (target 4.2+), resolution time (target < 4hrs), volume
Zendesk — Best for Enterprise and Multi-Channel
Setup checklist:
1. Ticket fields: type, priority, product area, customer tier
2. SLA policies: P1 (15min FRT), P2 (1hr), P3 (4hr), P4 (8hr)
3. Triggers: auto-assign, auto-respond, escalate on keywords
4. Views: My Open, Unassigned, High Priority, All Open
5. Macros: 20+ for common responses
6. Guide (KB): 30+ articles published before launching chat
7. Explore: team performance dashboard, CSAT trends, volume by channel
Implementation Checklist
Common Pitfalls
- AI agent launched without training data. 5 help articles → 70% wrong
answers → frustrated customers. Fix: 30+ articles. Test with 50 questions.
- Chat widget on every page. Noise. Distraction. Fix: Pricing, help center,
and post-signup only.
- No SLAs. "We respond quickly" = no commitment. Fix: Specific FRT targets
by priority. Measured. Reported. Reviewed weekly.
Output Format
The agent delivers a support platform configuration guide matched to the user's tool and team stage:
- Platform Recommendation (when selection is requested): scoring across stage fit, team size, and support philosophy — with a 1-line rationale for Intercom vs. Zendesk vs. Front vs. Help Scout
- Platform Setup Checklist: prioritized configuration steps for the chosen tool — AI agent training (article count target + 50-question QA protocol), macros for top ticket types, SLA policy definitions, view configuration, and reporting setup
- Knowledge Base Plan: article count target (minimum 30 before launching chat), topic coverage map by product area, and Fin/AI training QA pass rate threshold (95%+ on test set)
- SLA Matrix: Priority tiers (P1–P4) with First Response Time target, resolution target, escalation trigger, and measurement method
- CSAT & Reporting Dashboard: metric targets (CSAT ≥ 4.2, resolution time by tier), review cadence, and auto-escalation rule for scores below threshold
Quality Check
Before delivering, verify:
Execution Artifacts
references/framework-notes.md — named frameworks, citation anchors, and operating assumptions
templates/output-template.md — copy-paste deliverable structure for the user
scripts/check-output.py — local checklist validator for required sections
This skill includes lightweight artifacts the agent can load on demand:
references/platform-comparison.md — Intercom vs Zendesk vs Front vs Help Scout
templates/sla-matrix.md — P1–P4 FRT and resolution targets
Use the artifacts when the user asks for an implementation-ready deliverable, a repeatable workflow, or a quality check rather than generic advice.
Related Skills
support-tool-stack — Platform selection by stage
headless-support — AI support agents and KB architecture
sla-management — SLA design and escalation
cs-analytics-dashboards — CS metrics and health scores